RESEARCH PAPER
Research on the Quality Evaluation System of Pharmacy Open Experimental Teaching
Wang Huanqi 1
,  
Du Peige 1
,  
Li Zitong 1
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Pharmacy College of Beihua University, Jilin City, CHINA
Online publish date: 2017-11-01
Publish date: 2017-11-01
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(11):7375–7379
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Aim to establish a scientific and reasonable quality evaluation method of pharmacy open experimental teaching mode. Method The pharmacy open experiment is embodied in the forms of amateurism, nature of curriculum and graduation design; three different forms of quality evaluation system are established according to the three different forms of open experimental teaching. Results The established quality evaluation system of pharmacy open experimental teaching mode breaks the traditional single evaluation mode; embodies the student-oriented educational thought; and also conduces to improve the enthusiasm and proactivity of students to participate in the experiment, achieve teaching objectives, and increase teaching quality. Conclusion The research also has certain enlightening effect on the reform of assessment and evaluation mode of pharmacy open experimental teaching of higher education in China.
 
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Chen, Y.-C., Deyi, K. (2017). An Investigation on Factors in the Integration of Reciprocal Teaching into Multimedia Teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 13(1), 133–142. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00608a.
 
2.
De Marsico, M., Sciarrone, F., Sterbini, A., & Temperini, M. (2017). Supporting Mediated Peer-Evaluation to Grade Answers to Open-Ended Questions Maria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 13(4), 1085–1106. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00660a.
 
3.
Hu, R., Wu, Y.-Y., Chich-Jen, S. (2016). Effects of Virtual Reality Integrated Creative Thinking Instruction on Students’ Creative Thinking Abilities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(3), 477–486. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1226a.
 
4.
Incikabi, L. (2013). Teacher Candidates’ Efficacy Beliefs in Mathematics: Play-Generated Curriculum Instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(2), 167–176. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.927a.
 
5.
Lin, G.-Y. (2016). Effects that Facebook-based Online Peer Assessment with Micro-teaching Videos Can Have on Attitudes toward Peer Assessment and Perceived Learning from Peer Assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2295–2307. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1280a.
 
6.
Price, C., van Jaarsveld, P. (2017). Using Open-response Tasks to Reveal the Conceptual Understanding of Learners-Learners Teaching the Teacher what they know about Trigonometry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 159-175. doi:10.1080/18117295.2017.1329054.
 
7.
Qu, S.-Y., Hu, T., Wu, J.-L., Hou, X. M. (2017). “New Engineering” Practice Teaching Mode. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(7), 4271–4279. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
8.
Schauer, F., Lustig, F., Dvorak, J., & Ozvoldova, M. (2008). An easy-to-build remote laboratory with data transfer using the Internet School Experimental System. European Journal of Physics, 29(4), 753-765. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/29/4/010.
 
9.
Torres, T., Milicic, B., Soto, C., & Sanjose, V. (2013). Generating Students’ Information Seeking Questions in the Scholar Lab: What Benefits Can We Expect From Inquiry Teaching Approaches? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 259–272. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.934a.
 
10.
Yang, K.-T., Wang, T.-H., & Chiu, M.-H. (2015). Study the Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Interactive Teaching Environment on Student Learning of Junior High School Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(2):263–275. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a.
 
11.
Ying, H. (2009). Research on the Open Experimental Teaching Mode for Computer Major. 2009 International Forum on Computer Science-Technology and Applications, 3, Proceedings 2009, 380-382. doi:10.1109/IFCSTA.2009.331.
 
12.
Yonghui, C., Kirilova, G. I., & Grunis, M. L. (2017). Cooperative Research Projects of Master’s Students (Education Programs) in the Open Informational Educational Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(7), 2859–2868. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00722a.
 
13.
Zhang, M. H., Li, Y. (2017). Teaching Experience on Faculty Members’ Perceptions about the Attributes of Open Educational Resources (OER). International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(4), 191-199. doi:10.3991/ijet.v12i04.6638.
 
14.
Zheng, B., Liu, Y. Q., Liu, R. X., Meng, J. & Mao, M. M. (2013). Open Experimental Teaching in Fluid Mechanics. Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology III, PTS, 1-4.2013, 397-400, 2735-2738. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.397-400....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215