Risk Based Ecological Economics to Engineering Students
More details
Hide details
Institute of Pedagogy, Psychology and Social Problems, Kazan, RUSSIA
Transbaikal State University, Chita, RUSSIA
RUDN University (Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia), Moscow, RUSSIA
Stolypin International Institute of Informatization and Public Administration, Moscow, RUSSIA
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA
Samara State University of Economics, Samara, RUSSIA
Gzhel State University, Elektroizolyator, RUSSIA
University of Zilina, SLOVAKIA
Online publish date: 2017-11-30
Publish date: 2017-11-30
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(3):753–764
Modern ecological crisis threatens the sustainability of human civilization. Awareness and education for probable disaster risk reduction give greater urgency to the issue of decreasing industrial failure rates associated with basic manufacturing activities and, consequently, improving the training in this area. The authors have highlighted the features of modern risk based approach in engineering training based on proximity of production entities to anthropogenic factors: allocation of risks and threats in professional and personal situations or tasks; critical analysis of any industrial process and considering its consequences; using professional and personal risk response strategies; risk-based thinking as the core professional activity. The paper considers the mechanism of risk-based thinking as a necessary part of engineering students training on the basis of diversionary analysis, and gives its algorithm adapted to their learning activities. A system of professional tasks and tools to be used in the students’ future job has been developed to promote their readiness and willingness to work across trades within the sphere of their technical competency. The paper is intended for researchers, practitioners, managers of enterprises dealing with ecological and economic production activities, as well as for professional training of engineers.
Aral, M. M. (2010). Environmental Modeling and Health Risk Analysis (Acts/Risk). USA: Springer.
Atkinson, J. W. (2008). Motivational Determinants of Risk-Taking Behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.
Ayyub, B. M. (2011). Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Ayyub, B. M. (2013). Risk analysis in engineering and economics. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.
Ayyub, B. M. (2014). Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics, Second Edition. USA: University of Maryland College Park.
Baetova, D. R. (2016). Economic risks and risks of quality as strategic risks of educational institutions. Competitiveness in the global world: economy, science, technology, 3, 16-19.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society. Toward a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
Belov, P. G. (2011). System analysis and modeling. Theoretical basis and forecasting. St. Petersburg: The strategy of the future.
Bradbury, J. (2016). The Policy Implications of Different Concepts of Risk. Science, Technology & Human Values, 14(4), 79-83.
Cai, J., Youngblood, V. T., Khodyreva, E. A., & Khuziakhmetov, A. N. (2017). Higher Education Curricula Designing on the Basis of the Regional Labour Market Demands. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2805-2819.
Cherdymova, E. I. (2013). Environmental intention of the person. Moscow: Publishing House “URAO”.
Cherdymova, E. I., & Sorokina T. M. (2013). Organizational and psychological support for the formation of eco-professional consciousness of students. Samara: Publishing House “Samara University”.
Cherdymova, E. I., Kuznetcov, V. A., Machnev, V. Y., Solovova, N. V., Sarbaeva, I. Yu., & Masalimova, A. R. (2017). Eco-Vocational Consciousness Formation Model of a Specialist in Modern Mega Polis. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(A Multidisciplinary Approach to science 5b), 493-507.
Ford, A. (2009). Modeling the Environment: An Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling of Environmental Systems. Island: Island Press.
Gullone, E., & Moore, S. (2000). Adolescent risk-taking and the five-factor model of personality. Adolescence, 23, 393–407.
Halperin, P. Y. (1998). Psychology as an objective science. Moscow: Pedagogy.
International Organisation for Standardization. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems - Requirements. Geneva: Withdrawn.
Kasyanenko, A. A. (2008). Analysis of the risk of accidents of technogenic systems. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.
Klimov, E. A. (1996). Psychology of the professional: Selected psychological works. Moscow: Voronezh.
Krutova, L. S. (2013). Mechanism of management of socio-ecological and economic risks in the region. Regional problems of economic transformation, 3(37), 235-241.
Levin, I. P., Xue, G., Weller, J. A., Reimann, M., & Lauriola, M. (2012). A neuropsychological approach to understanding risk-taking for potential gains and losses. Front Neurosci, 6, 15.
Levina, E. Y., Yevgrafova, O. G., Derdizova, F. V., Zagladina, E. N., Levchenkova, T. V., Murugova, V. V., Blinova, L. N., & Anfilatova, O. V. (2016). Educational systems scenarios development in modern conditions. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2, 76-81.
Michalopoulos, E., & Paparrizos, K. (2008). Risk-based decision making and risk management of European Union regional programs. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 18(1), 75-94.
Modarres, M. (2003). What Every Engineer Should Know About Reliability and Risk Analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
Modarres, M., Kaminsky, M., & Kristov, V. (2007). Reliability engineering and risk analysis: A practical guide. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
Muravyeva, E. V. (2017). Formation of ecocentrence in technical higher education. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 55(4), 300-306.
Muravyeva, E. V., & Romanovsky, V. L. (2010). Diversial analysis in forming risk-thinking at specialists in the field of security. News of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 12(9), 2306-2308.
Murzin, A. D. (2009). Identification and diagnostics of ecological and economic risks of urbanized territories. Russian academic journal, 9(4), 38-41.
Prokofieva, E. N. (2015). Safety and risk characteristics: aspects of understanding. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 1(108), 71-76.
Roland, H. E., & Moriarty, B. (1990). System safety engineering and management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Romanovsky, V. L., Muravyeva, E. V., & Chabanova, A. A. (2015). Applied technospheric risk in the context of risk management of technospheric complexes. Bulletin of the Scientific center of vital activity safety, 3(25), 123-128.
Sedova, E. N. (2008). Models of multiple selection in tasks of estimation and management of environmental economic risks. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, 10(92), 96-102.
Sendai Framework Program for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2016, January 25). Resolution A / CONF.224 / L.2 of the UN General Assembly. Retrieved from December 15, 2016, from
Shapkin, A. S. (2010). Theory of risk and modeling of risk situations. Moscow: Dashkov.
Steinberg, L. (2007). Risk taking in adolescence - New perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 55–59.
Synzynys, B. I. (2015). Environmental risk: a textbook for high schools. Moscow: The Logos.
Tymula, A., Rosenberg-Belmaker, L. A., Roy, A. K., Ruderman, L. & Manson, K. (2012). Adolescents’ risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 17135–17140.
Vaganov, P. A. (2008). How to calculate the risk of health hazards due to environmental pollution: Collection of tasks. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University.
Vishnyakov, Y. D. (2008). The general theory of risks: Textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Moscow: Academy.
Zeer, E. F. (2001). Psychology of professions. Moscow: Pedagogy.