RESEARCH PAPER
Risk in Implementing New Electronic Management Systems at Universities
 
More details
Hide details
1
Kazan National Research Technical University named after A.N. Tupolev - KAI, Kazan, RUSSIA
2
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
3
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
4
Yugra State University, Khanty-Mansiysk, RUSSIA
5
Russian Customs Academy, Moscow, RUSSIA
6
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, RUSSIA
Online publish date: 2017-12-07
Publish date: 2017-12-07
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(3):891–902
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Rapid development of using information technology in higher education contributes not only into its efficiency but also may cause a variety of risks affecting implementation of some other educational process aspects. Understanding the significance of the risks and their subsequent study and assessment allows for timely adjustments in implementation of certain informational and educational technologies in the educational process. The paper focuses on the issues related to identification of the major risks while introducing and implementing educational innovations, and those related to introduction of the learning management system (LMS) in higher education institutions, their impact assessment and influence on the efficiency throughout the entire educational process. The results of the study have been summarized using risk mapping and sensitivity analysis methods. These methods allowed us to visualize the level of each risk distinguished in the study according to the degree of its influence on the educational process and probability of its occurrence. The study was based on the survey findings and students’ interviews and aimed to identify whether they understand and realize the difficulties and complexities in the procedure of innovative technologies implementation by their university. The authors have developed a list of risks occurring while introducing and implementing innovations in the educational process which in their turn will reflect the peculiarities of the higher education institution using modern learning techniques. Moreover, the paper discusses the risk sensitivity study results. They are presented as an expert appraisal of risks related to their influence on the resultant as integrated assessment, i.e. the Wheel Model of risk management. In the course of the study it has been found that, despite the difficulties of innovation implementation, the innovative programs having been introduced improve the educational process and ensure appropriate quality of human capital, or workforce. Reasonable conclusions from the experience of the state-of the art innovation introduction into university teaching-learning process confirm its practical significance, its ability to encourage university students and increase their participation and independence in learning, thus contributing to development of their skills that meet the requirements of an economist position and in future will help them be successfully engaged into innovation economics. These students’ skills and competencies meet the requirements of innovative processes in the economy, despite the fact that the process involves certain risks. The paper materials may be of practical value to professionals involved in the development and implementation of innovative educational technologies at universities.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Cândido De Oliveira, D., Viera de Oliveira, J., & Oliveira Martins, S. R. (2014). Evaluating the Impact of Risks in the Implementation of it Projects in Federal Institutes of Education. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 3(12), 363-366.
 
2.
Cao, Y., Kirilova, G. I., & Grunis, M. L. (2017). Cooperative Research Projects of Master’s Students (Education Programs) in the Open Informational Educational Environment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 2859-2868.
 
3.
Deb, S. (2014). Information Technology, Its Impact on Society and Its Future. Advances in Computing, 4(1), 25-29.
 
4.
Development Strategy for socio-economic development of the Republic of Tatarstan for the period up to 2030 (2015). Ministry of Economics RT. Retrieved from http://mert.tatarstan.ru/strat....
 
5.
Dürkheim, E. (1995). Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose. Moscow: Kanon.
 
6.
Galushkin, A. A. (2015). Education in the Field of National Information Security in the Russian Federation and Abroad. Journal of Computer Science, 11(10), 988-994.
 
7.
Granito, M., & Chernobilsky, E. (2012). The Effect of Technology on a Student’s Motivation and Knowledge Retention. NERA Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from http://opencommons.uconn.edu/n....
 
8.
Ibatullova, Y. T., Vasyukhno I. O., Frolova, A. V., Mukhametzyanova, F. G., Zelenkova, E. V., & Sadovaya, V. V.(2015). Interrelation of social and psychological adaptation and tendency to deviant behavior of students. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 290-295.
 
9.
Information Technology Strategic Plan 2014-2017 (2013). In University of Wisconsin System. Retrieved on October 19, 2017 from https://www.wisconsin.edu/syst....
 
10.
Khasanova, A. Sh., Kvon G. M., & Mukhametzyanova, F. G. (2017). Risks of implementing innovations in the organization of educational process at the University. Bulletin of Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, 3(64), 110-119.
 
11.
Khasanova, A. Sh., Kvon, G. M., & Mukhametzyanova, F. G. (2015). Evaluation of labor market prospects as business entities. Bulletin of Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, 1(53), 133-137.
 
12.
Khasanova, A. Sh., Kvon, G. M., & Vaks, V. B. (2017). SWOT analysis of innovative educational technologies introduction at the University. Bulletin of Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, 4(65), 160-167.
 
13.
Khrulyova, A.A., & Sakhieva, R.G. (2017). Forming of Informational Culture as a Necessary Condition of the Level Raising of Higher Education. Man in India, 97(15), 211-225.
 
14.
Kong Y., Kayumova, L. R., & Zakirova, V. G. (2017). Simulation Technologies in Preparing Teachers to Deal with Risks. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4753-4763.
 
15.
Kvon, G. M., & Vaks, V. B. (2017). Features of electronic learning management system use in the educational process. Conference Proceedings: Education: innovations and traditions (p. 104-105). Prague: WORLD PRESS.
 
16.
Kvon, G. M., Lushchik, I. V., Karpenko, M. A., Zaitseva, N. A., Kulkov, A. A., Galushkin, A. A., & Yakupova, N. M. (2017). Regional investment policy: analysis and assessment of the investment environment state. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(5b), 835-853.
 
17.
Levina, E. Y., Masalimova A. R., Kryukova N. I., Grebennikov V. V., Marchuk N. N., Shirev D. A., Renglikh K. A., & Shagieva R. V. (2017). Structure and Content of e-Learning Information Environment Based on Geo-Information Technologies. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5019-5031.
 
18.
Mansell, R. (1999). Information and communication technologies for development: assessing the potential and the risks. Telecommunications policy, 23(1), 35-50.
 
19.
Mansell, R., & Tremblay, G. (2013). Renewing the Knowledge Societies Vision. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/file....
 
20.
Mukhametzyanova, F. G. (2016). Higher education quality risk. Vestnik TISBI, 2, 7-12.
 
21.
Mukhametzyanova, F. G., Kvon, G. M., Rzhevskaya, Yu. Ye., & Veselovsky, A. A. (2016). Subjectivity of a university student as the basis of human capital. Conference Proceedings: Education: innovations and traditions (pp. 241-243). Prague: WORLD PRESS.
 
22.
Nikolić, B., & Ružić-Dimitrijević, L. (2009). Risk Assessment of Information Technology Systems Informing Science and Information Technology, 6, 595-615.
 
23.
Rykhtikova, N. A. (2009). Analysis and risk management of the organization: Study guide. Moscow: INFRA-M.
 
24.
Shamshina, T., & Koryuhina, C. (2015). Open education: continuity of approaches and risks. Information Technologies, Management and Society, 8(1), 12-15.
 
25.
Shisharina, N. V. (2016). Innovations in education: modern social practice. Conference Proceedings: Social pedagogy in modern social practices (p. 488-496) Arzamas, Russia, Arzamas branch of Nizhny Novgorod state University named after. N. I. Lobachevsky.
 
26.
Shushara, T. V., & Khuziakhmetov, A. N. (2017). The Problem of Professional Orientation of Youth: Trends and Prospects. Man in India, 97(14), 197-205.
 
27.
Spitzer, M. (2014). Information technology in education: Risks and side effects. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3, 81–85.
 
28.
Vaks, V. B. (2015). Transnationalization of Business as a Factor of Innovation Potential of Modern Economic System. The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology, 3, 25-27.
 
29.
Vaks, V. B. (2016). The Influence of educational technologies on the Competitiveness of human capital.Inclusion in education, 3(3), 96-100.
 
30.
Weber, M. (2016). Economics and Society: Essays on Understanding Sociology. V. 1. Sociology. (in 4 volumes). Moscow: Printing House of Higher School of Economics.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215