RESEARCH PAPER
Science of Complex Systems and Citizenship Skills: A Pilot Study with Adult Citizens
 
More details
Hide details
1
Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, ITALY
2
University of Parma, ITALY
3
Municipality of Dozza, Bologna, ITALY
Online publish date: 2018-01-27
Publish date: 2018-01-27
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(4):1533–1545
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The issue of scientific citizenship in the context of STEM education has been under debate for over two decades. We present a preliminary study which aims to investigate if, how and why the development of hard scientific skills grounded in the discipline of complex systems (suitably simplified and adapted) may foster the development of citizenship skills that can impact on people’s approaches to facing problems and making decisions. We carried out a pilot study with a group of 34 volunteer adult citizens. The data analysis showed that: i) in the beginning, only a few participants were comfortable dealing with scientific and epistemological concepts related to complex systems, favouring instead a “common sense” approach towards decision-making; ii) in some successful cases, there was an alignment between scientific competences and decision-making strategies, suggesting that it is possible to design activities based on authentic scientific concepts in order to develop citizenship skills.
 
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Anfara, V. A., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318....
 
2.
Albertazzi, L. (2017). Scientific knowledge and citizenship skills. Pilot study with adult citizens about the themes of complexity and future (Master Dissertation in Physics, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna). Retrieved from AMSLaurea Institutional Theses Repository. (Accession No. 13527).
 
3.
Barelli, E. (2017). Science of complex systems and future-scaffolding skills: a pilot study with secondary school students (Master dissertation in Physics, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Boogna). Retrieved from AMSLaurea Institutional Theses Repository. (Accession No. 13644).
 
4.
Bauman, Z. (2016). Scrivere il futuro. Rome: Castelvecchi.
 
5.
Casti, J. L. (1994). Complexification: explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
 
6.
Channel 0524432. (2012). The Meaning of Life (John Conway’s Game of Life segment) [video file]. Retrieved on November 15, 2017 from https://youtu.be/CgOcEZinQ2I.
 
7.
Chen, Y. C. (2017). Empirical study on the effect of digital game-based instruction on students’ learning motivation and achievement. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3177-3187. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
8.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
 
9.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
 
10.
EC. (2015). Science Education for Responsible Citizenship. Retrieved on November 15, 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/research/s....
 
11.
EPC. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union. L394/10. Retrieved on November 15, 2017 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal....
 
12.
Eurydice. (2012). Citizenship Education in Europe. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
 
13.
Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1989). The nature of conceptual understanding in biomedicine: The deep structure of complex ideas and the development of misconceptions. In D. Evans & V. Patel (Eds.), The cognitive sciences in medicine, 113–172. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
 
14.
Gardner, M. (1970). Mathematical Games – The fantastic combinations of John Conway’s new solitaire game “life”. Scientific American, 223(4), 120–123.
 
15.
Greco, P. (2014). Le basi per una società democratica della conoscenza. In P. Greco (Ed.), Scienza e democrazia: nuovi diritti per una nuova cittadinanza, 1-12. Scienza & Società 19/20. Milano: Centro Pristem Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.
 
16.
Hancock, T., & Bezold, C. (1994). Possible futures, preferable futures. Healthcare Forum Journal, 37(2), 23–29.
 
17.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Pfeffer, M. G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-....
 
18.
I SEE. (2016). Retrieved on November 15, 2017 from www.iseeproject.eu.
 
19.
Jacobson, M. J. (2000a). Butterflies, traffic jams, and cheetahs: Problem solving and complex systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
 
20.
Jacobson, M. J. (2000b). Problem Solving About Complex Systems: Differences between Experts and Novices. In B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 14-21. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
 
21.
Jacobson, M. J. (2001). Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6(3), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.1....
 
22.
Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327....
 
23.
Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems. Science, 208(4450), 1335–1342. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
 
24.
Levrini, O., Fantini, P., Tasquier, G., Pecori, B., Levin M. (2015). Defining and Operationalizing Appropriation for Science Learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(1), 93-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/105084....
 
25.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.) (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: Nuffield Foundation.
 
26.
Mitchell, W. J., Larson, K., & Pentland, A. S. (2010). Retrieved on November 15, 2017 from http://livinglab.mit.edu/#.
 
27.
Morin, E. (1986). La Méthode (vol. 3). La connaissance de la connaissance. Paris: Seuil.
 
28.
Neutel, A. M. (2014). Feedback loops: how nature gets its rhythm. Retrieved on November 15, 2017 from http://ed.ted.com/lessons/feed....
 
29.
NRC. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded Edition). J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, R. R. Cocking, & S. Donovan (Eds.). Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning and Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
 
30.
Omicini A., & Contucci P. (2013) Complexity and Interaction: Blurring Borders between Physical, Computational, and Social Systems. In C. Bǎdicǎ, N. T. Nguyen, & M. Brezovan (Eds.) Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications. ICCCI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8083. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
 
31.
Osborne, J. (2010). Science for citizenship. In J. Osborne, J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching, 46-67. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw Hill Open University Press.
 
32.
Parisi, D. (2001). Simulazioni. La realtà rifatta nel computer, Bologna: Il Mulino.
 
33.
Pedercini, P., & Burke, L. (2013). Designing games to understand complexity. Allied Media Conference. Detroit. Retrieved on November 15, 2017 from http://www.molleindustria.org/....
 
34.
Resnick, M., & Wilensky, U. (1993). Beyond the Deterministic, Centralized Mindsets: A New Thinking for New Science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
 
35.
Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic Models of Segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/002225....
 
36.
van Bilsen, A., Bekebrede, G., & Mayer, I. (2010). Understanding complex adaptive systems by playing games. Informatics in Education, 9(1), 1-18.
 
37.
Vi Hart, & Nicky Case, A. (n.d.). A playable post on the shape of society. Retrieved November 15, 2017, from http://ncase.me/polygons/.
 
38.
Vi Hart, & Nicky Case, B. (n.d.). Simulating the world (in Emoji). Retrieved November 15, 2017 from http://ncase.me/simulating/.
 
39.
Volterra, V. (1926). Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d’individui in specie animali conviventi. Memorie Della R. Accademia Nazionale Dei Lincei, II, 5–112.
 
40.
Voros, J. (2003). A generic foresight process framework, Foresight, 5(3), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/146366....
 
41.
Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems perspective to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3–19.
 
42.
Wu, Y. W., Wen, M. H., Chen, C. M., & Hsu, I. T. (2016). An Integrated BIM and Cost Estimating Blended Learning Model: Acceptance Differences Between Experts and Novice. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1347-1363. https://doi.org/10.12973/euras....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215