Swedish Fifth and Sixth Graders’ Motivational Values and the Use of ICT in Mathematics Education
More details
Hide details
Lulea University of Technology, SWEDEN
Online publish date: 2019-05-27
Publish date: 2019-05-27
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(12):em1776
In Sweden, the introduction of new national curricula for primary and secondary schools has implied, for example, that programming has become a compulsory part of mathematics education since August 2018. We study Swedish fifth and sixth graders and the distributions of their motivational values related to studying mathematics with paper and pencil vs. with ICT.

Materials and methods:
We examine, in the framework of Expectancy–value theory, data collected from 93 pupils using Student’s t-test, correlation analysis and binary logistic regression analysis.

Choosing between traditional and ICT-based approaches significantly affects the distribution of pupils’ motivational values; pupils express higher attainment, utility, and cost values when studying mathematics with paper and pencil is concerned. In general, girls express higher motivation in mathematics than boys do. The utility value is the only significant predictor for the view that studying with ICT makes their learning of mathematics qualitatively better.

The Swedish fifth and sixth graders also motivated to study mathematics with ICT, yet the distributions of values differ across the genders; boys may benefit more from studying with ICT. Girls seem to need more and a different kind of encouragement than boys to find using ICT in mathematics education meaningful.

Abidin, Z., Mathrani, A., & Hunter, R. (2018). Gender-related differences in the use of technology in mathematics classrooms: Student participation, learning strategies and attitudes. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(4), 266-284.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (2012). On the Functional Properties of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44.
Biagi, F., & Loi, M. (2013). Measuring ICT use and learning outcomes: evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 28-42.
DeWitte, K., & Rogge, N. (2014). Does ICT matter for effectiveness and efficiency in mathematics education? Computers & Education, 75, 173-184.
Drijvers P. (2015). Digital Technology in Mathematics Education: Why It Works (Or Doesn’t). In S. Cho, Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 135-151). Cham: Springer.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence, Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830-847.
Genlott, A. A., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). Closing the gaps ¬– Improving literacy and mathematics by ict-enhanced collaboration. Computers & Education, 99, 68-80.
Haapasalo, L. (2007). Adapting mathematics education to the needs of ICT. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 1(1), 1-10.
Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427-443.
Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010) A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215-243.
Lundmark, N. (2018). IKT i matematikundervisning. Hur påverkar det elevers syn på sin motivation? [ICT in mathematics education. How does it influence on pupils’ view of their motivation?] Master thesis. Lulea: Lulea University of Technology.
Skolverket. (2016). Curriculum for elementary school, preschool class and after-school center 2011 (Revised 2016). Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Education.
Torff, B., & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54, 379-383.
Tossavainen, T. & Juvonen, A. (2015). Finnish primary and secondary students' interest in music and mathematics relating to enjoyment of the subject and perception of the importance and usefulness of the subject. Research Studies in Music Education, 37(1), 107-121.
Tossavainen, T. & Pehkonen, E. (2013) Three kinds of mathematics: scientific mathematics, school mathematics and didactical mathematics. Far East Journal of Mathematical Education, 11(1), 27-42.
Tossavainen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2018). Tablet computers and Finnish primary and lower secondary students’ motivation in mathematics. In E. Norén, H. Palmer & A. Cooke, Nordic Research in Mathematics Education. Papers of NORMA 17 The Eighth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education Stockholm, May 30 - June 2, 2017 (pp. 59–67). Gothenburg: Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.