Special issue paper
CC-BY 4.0

Teacher in Reggio Emilia Approach: Educational Needs and Views

Department of Educational Programs and Instruction, Near East University, Nicosia, N. CYPRUS
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(1):279–290
Online publish date: 2017-11-06
Publish date: 2017-11-06
This article has been presented in ICES 2017 - International Conference on Environmental Sciences & Educational Studies. This article belongs to the special issue " Interdisciplinary Research on the Environmental Education, Educational Studies in Sustainability & Instructional Technologies and Designs".
This study situates the educational needs of pre-school educators based on the essential aspects of the Reggio Emilia approach. A total of 156 pre-school educators agreed to participate in the study. The investigation combines both qualitative and quantitative research methods. The Reggio Emilia themed survey was conducted with the aim of gathering data on the educational needs related to the particular subject group. The survey consisted of two sections. The first part of the survey involved examining nine demographic factors, while the second part consisted of 49 Reggio Emilia based educational need items in total. All surveys were applied to the pre-school teachers’ face-to-face in order to increase the reliability level of the research. In the survey, the opinions of the teachers were consulted in order to evaluate their needs in terms of the Reggio Emilia approach. Statistical analysis of the gathered data demonstrated that all teachers’ have educational needs according to all of the determined dimensions of the approach. The dimensions included techniques, assessment and evaluation, tools and techniques and parental involvement in the survey. It was found that vocational seniority, vocational placement and family involvement matters affected the educational needs of the teachers’ in various ways based on the approach.
1. Abbott, L., & Nutbrown, C. (2001). Experiencing Reggio Emilia: Implications for Preschool Provision. Buckingham. UK: Open University Press.
2. Akinbode, J. F. (1996). Staff development. Journal of the Institute of Personnel Management of Nigeria, 12(2), 52-57.
3. Barnett, W. S. (2008). Preschool education and its lasting effects: Research and policy implications. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved on 20.04.16 from http://epicpolicy.org/publication/preschooleducation.
4. Benson, H. A., Guess, D., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1985). Concepts and Issues Related to Choice Making and Autonomy among Persons with Severe Disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 79–86.
5. Brand, S. (1987). The Media Lab: inventing the future at MIT. New York: Viking.
6. Bray, M., Chen, E., Ip, P., Lee, D., Rao, N., Shaeffer, S., Sun, J., Wong, J. M. S., Weekes, B., & Young, M. (2014). Early childhood development and cognitive development in developing countries: A rigorous literature review. Department for International Development. Faculty of Education.
7. Cadwell, L. B. (2008). The Reggio Approach to Early Childhood Education Bringing Learning to Life. New York. Teachers College Press.
8. Canman, D. (2000). İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi. Ankara. Yargı Yayını.
9. Çelikten, M., Şanal, M. & Yeni, Y. (2005). Öğretmenlik mesleği ve özellikleri. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 207-237.
10. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 301-321.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (1954). Educational psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
12. Edwards, C. (2002). Three Approaches from Europe: Waldorf, Montessori, and Reggio Emilia. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 4, no. 1. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v4nl/edwards.html.
13. Edwards, C., Forman, G., & Gandini, L. (1998). The Hundred Languages of Children. The Reggio Emilia Approach-Advanced Reflections (2nd Ed.). London: Ablex Publishing.
14. Gülbahar, B. (2016). Views of the Teachers on the Behaviors and the Personal Characteristics of the School Principal Which are Effective in Formation of a Democratic School Environment. The Anthropologist. International Journal of Contemporary and Applied Studies of Man, 23(1).21-32.
15. Haynes, K. T., & Heyneman, S. (2004). International uses of education technology: threats and opportunities. Paris: IEEP Publications.
16. Helm, H., & Katz, L. (2001). Young Investigators: The Project Approach in the Early Years. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. İnan, H. Z., Kantor, R., & Trundle, K. C. (2010). Understanding natural sciences education in a Reggio Emilia-inspired preschool. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1186-1208.
18. Kaga, Y., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2008). UNESCO- The contribution of early childhood education to a sustainable society. France.
19. Kay, K. (2009). Preparing every child for the 21st century, partnership for 21st century skills. Retrieved on 23 March 2012 from http://www.cpb.org/stations/reports/PreparingChildren21stCentury.pdf.
20. Kılınç, H. H. (2016). Teachers’ Perception of 2nd Grade English Curriculum of Primary School in Turkey. The Anthropologist. International Journal of Contemporary and Applied Studies of Man, 251-266.
21. Krechevsky. M., & Rinaldi, C. (2001). Making learning visible: Children as individual and group learners. Reggio Emilia, Italy: Reggio Children, 78–89.
22. LTS. (2006). The Reggio Emilia Approach to Early Years Education. LTS. Glasgow. Retrieved on 4 April 2016 from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/ReggioAug06_tcm4-393250.pdf.
23. Nakpodia, E. D. (2008). The role of Educational administration in the promotion of in-service teacher education for primary school teachers in Nigeria. Current issues in educational management in Nigeria. Benin City: Ambik Press.
24. Pam, C. (1996). Child-Centered Early Childhood Education In Eastern Europe: The Step by Step Approach. Childhood Education, 72(6), p.337-341.
25. Redman, C. W., & Thangaratinam, S. (2005). The Delphi Technique. The obstetrician & Gynaecologist. (7), 120-125.
26. Rinaldi, C. (2001). Documentation and assessment: What is the relationship? In C. Giudici, Rinaldi, C. and Kreschevsky, M. (eds) Making Learning Visible: Children as Group and Individual Learners, Reggio Children, pp.78-89.
27. Robertson, E. (2008). Teacher education in a democratic society. Learning and Teaching the Practices of Democratic Participation, in Marilyn Cochran-Smith, Sharon Feiman-Nemser, and John McIntyre, Eds., The Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 3rd edition (New York: Taylor & Francis Group and The Association of Teacher Educators, 2008), pp. 27-44.
28. Udofia, U., İ., & Ikpe, U. N. (2012). Administration of In-Service Training and Teachers Attitude to Work in Private Secondary Schools in Cross River State of Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(10), 255-265.
29. Vargas-Baron, E., & Schipper, J. (2012). Review of Policy and Planning Indicators in Early Childhood. RISE Institute (commissioned by UNESCO, Paris).
30. Wexler, A. (2004). A theory for living: Walking with Reggio Emilia. Art Education, 57(6), 13-19.