Teachers’ Core Beliefs about Improving Students’ Transfer of Algebraic Skills from Mathematics into Physics in Senior Pre-university Education
More details
Hide details
Faculty of Applied Sciences, Science Education and Communication, Delft University of Technology, Delft, THE NETHERLANDS
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, THE NETHERLANDS
Publish date: 2018-07-13
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(10):em1596
Students in senior pre-university education face difficulties in the application of mathematics in physics. This paper presents the results of a qualitative study on teachers’ core beliefs about improving the transfer of algebraic skills to physics. Teachers were interviewed about their beliefs regarding a transfer problem from mathematics to physics for which solution algebraic skills were needed. We obtained large amount of data which were reduced to sixteen core beliefs including constraints and affordances influencing students’ demonstration of coherent mathematics education (CME) and transfer of algebraic skills from mathematics into physics. These core beliefs were grouped into the five main categories ‘Collaboration’, ‘Curricula’, ‘Students’, ‘Teachers’ and ‘Textbooks’. We think that our approach to pattern coding is both elegant and generally applicable to reduce code trees including large amount of data. Four core beliefs were identified as naïve beliefs, which may impede transfer. We provided a powerful remedy against such unproductive beliefs: through professional development programs teachers with such beliefs should be made aware, reflect and reconcile their naïve beliefs with those required for transfer. These core beliefs contain data to extract teachers’ belief systems. Quantitative research could investigate to which extent this is the case and which beliefs these contain.
Alink, N., Asselt, R. van, & Braber, N. den (2012). Samenhang en afstemming wiskunde en de profielvakken [Coherence between mathematics and the profile subjects]. Utrecht / Enschede, The Netherlands: cTWO / SLO.
Atiyah, M., Dijkgraaf, R., & Hitchin, N. (2010). Geometry and physics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1914), 913-926.
Awodun, A., Omotade, O. J. O., & Adeniyi, O. (2013). Mathemtics skills as predictors of physics student’s performance in senior secondary schools. International Journal of Science and Research, 2(7), 391-394.
Barnett, S., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637.
Basson, I. (2002). Physics and mathematics as interrelated fields of thought development using acceleration as an example. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 33(5), 679-690.
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 20–30.
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (Eds.). (2014). Initiatives in mathematics and science education with global implications. Columbus, OH: International Consortium for Research in Science and Mathematics Education.
Bolton, J., & Ross, S. (1997). Developing students’ physics problem-solving skills. Physics Education, 32(3), 176.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cooney, T. J. (1985). A Beginning Teacher’s View of Problem Solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324-336.
Cui, L. (2006). Assessing college students’ retention and transfer from calculus to physics (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
Davison, D. M., Miller, K. W., & Metheny, D. L. (1995). What does integration of science and mathematics really mean? School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226-230.
Dierdorp, A., Bakker, A., van Maanen, J., & Eijkelhof, H. (2014). Meaningful statistics in professional practices as a bridge between mathematics and science: an evaluation of a design research project. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(9), 1-15.
Drijvers, P. (Ed.). (2011). Secondary algebra education. Revisiting topics and themes and exploring the unknown. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London, UK: Falmer.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting Mathematics Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Gibson, W., & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. Sage.
Guskey, T. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.
Hameed, A. M. A., Metwally, A. S., Al Shaya, F. S., & Abdo, F. M. (2015). Mathematical Skills Necessary to Solve Physics Problems in the Secondary Stage in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies [JEPS], 9(2), 351-365.
Haney, J. J., & McArthur, J. (2002). Four case studies of prospective science teachers’ beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science Education, 86, 783-802.
Haskell, R. E. (2001). Transfer of learning: cognition, instruction and reasoning. Academic Press, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hudson, H. T., & McIntire, W. R. (1977). Correlation between mathematical skills and success in physics. American Journal of Physics, 45(5), 470-471.
Ivanjek, L., Susac, A., Planinic, M., Andrasevic, A., & Milin-Sipus, Z. (2016). Student reasoning about graphs in different contexts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010106.
Karakok, G. (2009). Students’ transfer of learning of eigenvalues and eigenvectors: implementation of the actor-oriented transfer framework (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://ir.library.oregonstate....
Karam, R. (2014). Framing the structural role of mathematics in physics lectures: a case study on electromagnetism. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 1–23.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Konijnenberg, J. van de, Paus, J., Pieters, M., Rijke, K. & Sonneveld W. (2015). Afstemming wiskunde-natuurkunde tweede fase [Alignment of mathematics and physics in senior pre-university education]. Enschede, The Netherlands: cTWO / SLO.
Larsen‐Freeman, D. (2013). Transfer of learning transformed. Language Learning, 63(s1), 107-129.
Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 17–20.
Molefe, F. K. (2006). Mathematical knowledge and skills needed in physics education for grades 11 and 12 (Doctoral dissertation), North-West University.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center at Boston College.
Nashon, S., & Nielsen, W. S. (2007). Participation rates in physics 12 in bc: Science teachers' and students' views. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 7(2/3), 93-106.
Netherlands institute for curriculum development. (2017, February 28). Retrieved from
Nilsen, T., Angell, C., & Grønmo, L. S. (2013). Mathematical competencies and the role of mathematics in physics education: A trend analysis of TIMSS Advanced 1995 and 2008. Acta Didactica Norge, 7(1), Art-6.
Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265-279.
Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
Quinn, R. (2013). Students’ Confidence in the Ability to Transfer Basic Math Skills in Introductory Physics and Chemistry Courses at a Community College (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from 1466&context=dissertations.
Rebello, N. S., Cui, L., Bennett, A. G., Zollman, D. A., & Ozimek, D. J. (2007). Transfer of learning in problem solving in the context of mathematics and physics. Learning to solve complex scientific problems, 223-246.
Roorda, G. (2012). Ontwikkeling in verandering; ontwikkeling van wiskundige bekwaamheid van leerlingen met betrekking tot het concept afgeleide [Development of ‘change’; the development of students’ mathematical proficiency with respect to the concept of derivative] (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
Roorda, G., Goedhart, M., & Vos, P. (2014). An actor-oriented transfer perspective on high school students’ development of the use of procedures to solve problems on “rate of change”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 863-889.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). Mathematical problem solving. Elsevier.
Singley, K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skills. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2010). The influence of curriculum on student learning. In B. Reyes, R. Reyes, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends and future directions (pp. 351–362). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., Flipse, S., & de Vries M. J. (2017). Teachers' beliefs about improving transfer of algebraic skills from mathematics into physics in senior pre-university education. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 587-604.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the Book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
van den Heuvel – Panhuizen, M. H. A. M., & Wijers, M. M. (2005). Mathematics standards and curricula in the Netherlands. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37(4), 287–307.
van Hiele, P. M. (1974). System separation and transfer. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5(4), 413-417.
van Zanten, M. & van den Heuvel – Panhuizen, M. (2014). Freedom of design: the multiple faces of subtraction in Dutch primary school textbooks. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 231-259) (29 p.). Heidelberg/Dordrecht /London/New York: Springer.
Wu, H. (1999). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding: A bogus dichotomy in mathematics education. The American Educator. American Federation of Teachers, Fall 1999.