Technology and Drama based Creative Collaborative Writing in Teaching
 
More details
Hide details
1
Near East University, NORTHERN CYPRUS
2
Cyprus Science University, NORTHERN CYPRUS
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Çelen Dimililer   

Near East University, NORTHERN CYPRUS
Online publish date: 2017-07-27
Publish date: 2017-07-27
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(8):5095–5106
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This article examines the use of technology through creative collaborative drama writing as opposed to using only the traditional “chalk and talk” methods of teaching for Language Classes based on the students’ perspectives. The research was conducted with first year English Literature students who took a Literary Terminology course over a period of ten weeks. The data were collected through observation of the course instructor and interviews. A qualitative approach was used in this study. A case study was chosen and questions were prepared for a semi-structured interview form in order to gather data. Content analysis was used to examine the data. The purpose of this study is to reveal the importance of alternative, innovative and effective teaching applications in English language teaching. It is believed that, if teachers or teacher candidates experience student-centred and modern teaching methods, they will have increased capacity to deliver lectures with higher quality. When the findings of the research are examined, it can be seen that the teachers experienced time management problems, both before and after the application. Consequently, it is believed that teachers and teacher candidates require time management training for class activities.
 
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Bejarno, Y. (1987). A cooperative small-group methodology in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 483-501.
 
2.
Cannon, C. (1985). The Canterbury Tales, introduction, P.xix Cambridge University Press,2017. Retrived from http://dictionary.cambridge.or... english/augmented-reality in 29th of June 2017.
 
3.
Chun, D., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64-80.
 
4.
Dickens, C. (1854). Hard times. London: Penguin Books.
 
5.
Erbay, F., & Doğru, S. S. Y. (2010). The effectiveness of creative drama education on the teaching of social communication skills in mainstreamed students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4475-4479.
 
6.
Fathman, A., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom, 9, 178-190.
 
7.
Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education. London: Macmillan.
 
8.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L. (2005). Improving the Writing Performance, Knowledge, and Self-Efficacy of Struggling Young Writers: The Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207–241.
 
9.
Gravells, A. (2011). Principles and practice of assessment in the life-long learning sector. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd.
 
10.
Güneyli, A. (2016). Analyzing writing anxiety level of Turkish Cypriot students. Education and Science, 41(183), 163-180.
 
11.
Hamilton, J., & Mcleod, A. (1993). Drama in the languages classroom, London: Covent Garden Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research. International Journal of Computer Applications. doi:10.5120/7700-1041.
 
12.
Jones, E. (2008). Predicting performance in first-semester college basic writers: Revisiting the role of self-beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 209–238.
 
13.
Kempe, A. (2003). The role of drama in the teaching of speaking and listening as the basis for social capital. Research in Drama Education, 8(1), 65-78.
 
14.
Khan, H. M. A., Farooqi, M. T. K., Khalil, A., & Faisal, I. (2016). Exploring relationship of time management with teachers’ performance. Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(2), 249-263.
 
15.
Klopfer E. (2008). .Augmented Learning: Research and design of mobile educational games. Cambridge: MIT Press,.
 
16.
Lam, S. F., & Law, Y. K. (2007). The roles of instructional practices and motivation in writing performance. The journal of experimental education, 75(2), 145-164.
 
17.
Liu, H., Lin, C. H., Zhang, D., & Zheng, B. (2017). Language Teachers' Perceptions of External and Internal Factors in Their Instructional (Non-) Use of Technology. In Preparing foreign language teachers for next-generation education (pp. 56-73). IGI Global.
 
18.
Luscombe, D. (2004). The New Cambridge Medieval History IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
19.
Majid, A. N. (2017). The use of information technology in teaching English: An attempt to develop student-centered learning at Telkom Polytechnic. Konferensi Nasional ICT-M Politeknik Telkom. Retrieved from journals.telkomuniversity.ac.i... view/585 in 29th of June 2017.
 
20.
Martinez, C.T., Kock, N. & Cass, J. (2011). Pain and pleasure in short essay writing: Factors predicting university students’ writing anxiety and writing self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(5), 351-360.
 
21.
McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching Materials and the Roles of EFL/ESL Teachers, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
 
22.
Packwood, A., & Messenheimer, T. (2003). Back to the future: developing children as writers. In E. Bearne, H. Dombey & T. Grainger (Eds.), Classroom interactions in literacy (pp. 144-156).Buckingham, Open University Press.
 
23.
Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of second language writing, 8(3), 265-289.
 
24.
Pound, L., & Hughes, C. (2008). How Children Learn. London: Step Forward Publishing.
 
25.
Ronke, A. (2005). Wozu all das theater? Drama and theatre as a method for foreign language) teaching and learning in higher education in the United States (Doctoral dissertation). University of Warwick, England.
 
26.
Singhal, S., Bagga, S., Goyal, P., & Saxena, V. (2012). Augmented chemistry: Interactive education system.
 
27.
Strauss, AL., & Corbin J. (1999). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
 
28.
Toye, N. , Prendiville, F. (2000). Drama and traditional story for the early years. London: Roudledge Falmer.
 
29.
Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39, 510-522.
 
30.
Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2016). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. Ankara: Seckin Publishing.
 
31.
Zafarullah, S., Khawaja, M., Panhwar, U. M., Siddigui, A. & Saeed, H. (2016). Teachers’ time management and the performance of students: a comparison of government and private schools of Hyderabad, Sindh, Pakistan. World Journal of Education, 6(6), 42-50.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215