Testing the Mediating Role of Open Innovation on the Relationship between Intellectual Property Rights and Organizational Performance: A Case of Science and Technology Park
More details
Hide details
Public Administration PhD., Assistant Professor, University of Islamic Denominations, Tehran, IRAN
Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, IRAN
Institute of Psychology and Education, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, RUSSIA
Department of International Cooperation, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of Civil Legal Disciplines, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, RUSSIA
Department of Humanitarian and Socio-Economic Disciplines, Moscow Higher Combined Arms Command School (MVOKU), Moscow, RUSSIA
Federal Methodical Centre for Accreditation of Specialists, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, RUSSIA
Online publish date: 2018-01-19
Publish date: 2018-01-19
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(4):1359–1369
The present study was conducted in Semnan Science and Technology Park and aimed to analyze the relationship among intellectual property rights, open innovation, and organizational performance of 30 New Technology Based Firms (NTBFs). Senior managers, middle managers, and business owners were considered as appropriate respondents for study. A total of 140 questionnaires were distributed among the respondents, and 126 filled questionnaires were returned. The research method used in this study is descriptive-correlation and the analysis was carried out utilizing Structural Equation Modeling. The factors analysis and the findings show that intellectual property rights have a significant positive relationship with open innovation. Further, open innovation has a significant positive relationship with organizational performance. Moreover, no significant relationship between intellectual property rights and organizational performance was established. But, intellectual property rights affect organizational performance positively, through open innovation acting as a mediator.
Allen, K. R. (2003). Bringing New Technology to Market. United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
Arora, A. (1997). Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 391–403.
Audretsch, D. B. (2002). The dynamic role of small firms: Evidence from the U.S. Small Business Economics, 18(1-3), 13–40.
Blind, K., Cremers, K., & Mueller, E. (2009). The influence of strategic patenting on companies’ patent portfolios. Research Policy, 38(2), 428–436.
Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 35(5), 655–672.
Blomqvist, K., Hara, V., Koivuniemi, J., & Aij, T. (2004). Towards networked R&D management: the R&D approach of Sonera Corporation as an example. R&D Management, 34(5), 591–603.
Candelin-Palmqvist, H., Sandberg, B., & Mylly, U. M. (2012). Intellectual property rights in innovation management research: a review. Technovation, 32(9), 502-512.
Carlaw, K., Oxley, L., Walker, P., Thorns, D., & Nuth, M. (2006). Beyond the hype: Intellectual property and the knowledge society/knowledge economy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 633–690.
Carlsson, B., Dumitriu, M., Glass, J., Nard, C., & Barrett, R. (2008). Intellectual property (IP) management: organizational processes and structures, and the role of IP donations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 549-559.
Carneiro, A. (2000). How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness? Journal of Knowledge Management 4(2), 87–98.
Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.) (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not), NBER Working Paper, wp 7552.
Daizadeh, I. (2007). Intellectual property management in R&D intensive firms. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 1(3), 184–205.
Dries, L., Pascucci, S., Torok, A., & Toth, J. (2013). Open Innovation: A Case-study of the Hungarian Wine Sector. EuroChoices, 12(1), 53-59.
Duguet, E., & Kabla, I. (1998). Appropriation Strategy and the Motivations to Use the Patent System: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing, Annals of Economics and Statistics. Annales d'Economie etde Statistique, (49/50), 289-327.
Enkel, E., Bell, J., & Hogenkamp, H. (2011). Open innovation maturity framework. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(06), 1161-1189.
Ernst, H. (1995). Patenting strategies in the German mechanical engineering industry and their relationship to company performance. Technovation, 15(4), 225–240.
Ernst, H. (2001). Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level. Research Policy, 30(1), 143–157.
Galiullin, I. R., Shinkevich, A. I., Novikov, A. A., Novikova, E. V., Kurbanov, R. A., Gurbanov, R. A., & Shireva, I. V. (2017). Service Enterprises' Non-Price Competition Economic Aspects: Macro and Meso Level of Research. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(7), 1159-1168.
Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. In R&D management conference, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 1-18).
Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Brusoni, S., Crespi, G., Francoz, D., Gambardella, A., Garcia-Fontes, W., Geuna, A., Gonzales, R., Harhoff, D., Hoisl, K., Le Bas, C., Luzzi, A., Magazzini, L., Nesta, L., Nomaler., Palomeras, N., Patel, P., Romanelli, M., & Verspagen, B. (2007). Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Research Policy, 36(8), 1107–1127.
Gloet, M., & Terziovski, M., (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 402–409.
Granstrand, O. (1999). Internationalization of corporate R&D: a study of Japanese and Swedish corporations. Research Policy, 28(2-3), 275-302.
Granstrand, O. (2000). The economics and management of intellectual property: Towards intellectual capitalism. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Granstrand, O. (2004). The economics and management of technology trade: towards a pro-licensing era? International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2), 209–240.
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2012). The anatomy of rise and fall of patenting and propensity to patent: the case of Sweden. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 5(2), 169-198.
Greenhalgh, C., Longland, M., & Bosworth, D. (2001). Protecting Intellectual Property: British, European and American Patents and Trade Marks of Selected UK Companies 1986-95, Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre. Electronic Journal of Intellectual Property Rights.
Grindley, P. C., & Teece, D. J. (1997). Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics. California Management Review, 39(2), 8–41.
Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. (2001). The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), 101–128.
Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135–144.
Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy 35(6), 825–838.
Joreskong, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and application, 2Ed, Chicago: SPSS Software.
Khuziakhmetov, A. N., & Gabdrakhmanova, R. G. (2016). Creativity in joint activity of teacher and student in the learning process. IEJME - Mathematics Education, 11(4), 735-745.
Khuziakhmetov, A. N., & Nasibullov, R. R. (2016). Dialectics of correlation of the school student personality socialization and individualization in pedagogical theory and practice. IEJME - Mathematics Education, 11(4), 475-487.
Khuziakhmetov, A. N., Belova, N. A., Kashkareva, E. A., & Kapranova, V. A. (2016). Future teachers’ training for learners’ individual projects management. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(3), 237-244.
Kirillova, E. A., Kurbanov, R. A., Svechnikova, N. V., Zul'fugarzade, T. E., & Zenin, S. S. (2017). Problems of Fighting Crimes on the Internet. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(3), 849-856.
Kurbanov, R. A., Nikonova, E. I., Gurbanov, R. A., Svechnikova, N. V., Tumarov, K. B., & Marin, E. M. (2016). Anthropological Methods of Formation of University Students’ Spiritual and Moral Culture. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 11807-11817.
Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2), 319–333.
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002). Some Simple Economics of Open Source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197-234.
Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, 783–831.
Luoma, T., Paasi, J., & Valkokari, K. (2010). Intellectual Property in Inter-Organisational Relationships-Findings from an Interview Study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(3), 399-414.
Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world with web context. İnformation and management, 38, 217-30.
Reitzig, M. (2004). Strategic Management of Intellectual Property. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(3), 35–40.
Rivette, K. G,. & Kline, D. (2000). Discovering New Value in Intellectual Property. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 54–66.
Schwartz, K., & Huff, B. (2010). The story of Eli Lilly’s open innovation journey: How one company developed a mature model. PDMA Visions, (March), 19–22.
Shcherbakov, V. S., Ashmarina, S. I., Suraeva, M. O., Kurbanov, R. A., Belyalova, A. M., Gurbanov, R. A., & Torkunova, J. V. (2017). Iteration as a Regulatory Function of Education Management. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(7), 1211-1219.
Smith, M., & Hansen, F. (2002). Managing intellectual property: a strategic point of view. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(4), 366–374.
Somaya, D. (2012). Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1084-1114.
Sullivan, P. (2001). Profiting from Intellectual Capital. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Sullivan, P. H., (1999). Profiting from intellectual capital. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2), 132–142.
Thumm, N. (2001). Management of Intellectual Property Rights in European Biotechnology Firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 67(23), 259–272.
Trott, P., & Hartmann, D. (2009). Why “open innovation” is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 715–736.
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open source software. R&D Management 26 (3), 319–331.
Yang, L. R., Chen, J. H., & Wang, H. W. (2012). Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice. Automation in Construction, 22, 182-191.
Zaripova, I. M., Merlina, N. I., Valeyev, A. S., Upshinskaya, A. E., Zaripov, R. N., Khuziakhmetov, A. N., & Kayumova, L. A. (2015). Methodological support for professional development of physical-mathematical sciences teachers, aimed at forming the project-technical competency of technical university students. Review of European Studies, 7(3), 313-318.
Zhao, M. (2006). Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52(8), 1185–1199.