The Effect of Integrative STEM Instruction on Elementary Students’ Attitudes toward Science
More details
Hide details
Departamento de Didácticas Específicas, Universidad de Burgos, SPAIN
Online publish date: 2018-01-21
Publish date: 2018-01-21
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(4):1383–1395
An inquiry-based integrative STEM education approach was implemented in two fourth grade Elementary Education classes, in Spain, through a module on simple machines. The viability of this science education model in the official Spanish curriculum and its influence on students’ attitudes towards science and learning of STEM subjects has been studied through an adapted Test of Science Related Attitude scale, achievement tests, and teachers’ interviews. Students participating in the integrative STEM project reported significantly more favourable attitudes toward science than students from traditional classrooms. Although attitude scale and achievement test results seem to show that an integrative STEM education may be feasible in 4th grade of the Spanish elementary education, interviews revealed reluctance among teachers to use integrative STEM education and more directive instructions on implementing such an educational model are demanded. Implications for science education and future studies are discussed.
1. Abell, S., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Handbook of research on science education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaium Associates.
2. Akpinar, E., Yildiz, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, Ö. (2009). Students’ attitudes toward science and technology: an investigation of gender, grade level, and academic achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2804-2808.
3. Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3, 101-134.
4. Ali, M. M., Yager, R. E., Hacieminoglu, E., & Caliskan, I. (2013). Changes in student attitudes regarding science when taught by teachers without experiences with a model professional development program. School Science and Mathematics, 113(3), 109-119.
5. ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education). (2011). Preparing future engineers around the world. PRISM, 21(5), 26-34.
6. Australian Government. (2013). Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in the National Interest: A Strategic Approach. Retrieved on 21 August 2017 from
7. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press.
8. Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2008). Attitudes towards science of intellectually gifted and mainstream upper primary students in Singapore. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 940-954.
9. Callegaro Borsa, J., Figueiredo Damásio, B., & Ruschel Bandeira, D. (2012). Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Psychological Instruments: Some Considerations. Paidéia, 22(53), 423–432.
10. Cañal, P. (1998) El origen de la investigación escolar: una alternativa se síntesis frente a la enseñanza tradicional. In G. Travé & F. J. Pozuelos (Eds) Investigar en el aula. Aportaciones para una didáctica innovadora. Universidad de Huelva: Servicio de Publicaciones.
11. Cañal, P. (2007). La investigación escolar, hoy. Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales, (52), 9-19.
12. Charrier Mellillán, M., Cañal, P., & Rodrigo Vega, M. (2006) Las concepciones de los estudiantes sobre la fotosíntesis y la respiración: una revisión sobre la investigación didáctica en el campo de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la nutrición de las plantas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 24(3), 401-410.
13. De Pro Bueno, A., & Pérez Manzano, A. (2014). Actitudes de los alumnos de Primaria y Secundaria ante la visión dicotómica de la Ciencia. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 32(3), 111-132.
14. Denessen, E., Vos, N., Hasselman, F., & Louws, M. (2015). The Relationship between Primary School Teacher and Student Attitudes towards Science and Technology. Education Research International, 2015, 1-7.
15. DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2015). Who Aspires to a Science Career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192.
16. EC (European Commision). (2016). Horizon 2020. Monitoring Report 2014. Luxembourg. Retrieved on 21 August 2017 from
17. EC (European Commission). (2015). Science education for Responsible Citizenship. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
18. El-Hani, C. N., & Greca, I. M. (2013). ComPratica: A Virtual Community of Practice for Promoting Biology Teachers Professional Development in Brazil. Research in Science Education, 43, 1327-1359.
19. Fraser, B. J. (1981). TOSRA: Test of science-related attitudes handbook. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
20. Hacieminoglu, E. (2016). Elementary school students’ attitude toward science and related variables. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(2), 35–52.
21. Hamed, S., Rivero, A., & del Pozo, R. M. (2016). El cambio en las concepciones de los futuros maestros sobre la metodología de enseñanza en un programa formativo. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 13(2), 476-492.
22. Haworth, C. M., Dale, P., & Plomin, R. (2008). A Twin Study in the Genetic and Environmental Influences on Academic Performance in Science in nine-year-old boys and girls. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1003-1025.
23. Heil, D. R., Pearson, G., & Burger, S. E. (2013). Understanding Integrated STEM Education: Report on a National Study. Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia.
24. Hsieh, H-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
25. Ireland, J. E., Waters, J. J., Brownless, J., & Lupton, M. (2012). Elementary teacher’s conceptions of inquiry teaching: messages for teacher development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 159-175.
26. Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 53-83.
27. Jones, G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes towards science and scientist. Science Education, 84, 180-192.<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-X.
28. Keeley, P. (2009). Elementary Science Education in the K-12 system. Retrieved from
29. Lindahl, B. (2007). A longitudinal Study of Students’ Attitudes towards Science and Choice of Career. 80th NARST International Conference, New Orleans.
30. LOMCE (Ley orgánica para la mejora de la calidad educativa). (2013, 10 December). Ley Orgánica 8/2013, 9 de diciembre. Boletín Oficial del Estado, nº 295.
31. Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisions (Final Report). Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
32. Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37.
33. NRC (National Research Council) (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
34. NRC (National Research Council) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35. NRC. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
36. NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2005). Conference on Declining Student Enrolment in Science and Technology. Amsterdam: OECD Global Science Forum.
38. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2006). Evolution of Student Interest in Science and Technology Studies. OECD Global Science Forum.
39. Oh, P. S., & Yager, R. E. (2004). Development of Constructivist Science Classrooms and Changes in Student Attitudes toward Science Learning. Science Education International, 15(2), 105-113.
40. Osborne, J. F., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards Science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049-1079.
41. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
42. Pitt, J. (2009). Blurring the Boundaries - STEM Education and Education for Sustainable Development. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, 14(1), 37-47.
43. Puacharearn, P., & Fisher, D. (2004). The effectiveness of cooperative learning integrated with constructivist teaching on improving learning environments in Thai secondary school science classrooms. Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
44. Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S. C. (2014). International View of STEM education. Proceedings PATT-28 conference, Florida.
45. Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science Education Now: A renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Brussels: Directorate General for Research, Science, Economy and Society. Retrieved from
46. Said, Z., Summers, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Wang, S. (2016). Attitudes toward science among grades 3 through 12 Arab students in Qatar: findings from a cross-sectional national study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 621–643.
47. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
48. Science and Engineering Education Advisory group. (2012). Supporting Scotland’s STEM education and culture. Retrieved from
49. Tai, R. H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1145.
50. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2015). Education for all 2000-2015. Achievements and challenges, France.
51. Yoon, H-G., Kim, M., Kim, B. S., Joung, Y. J., & Park, Y. S. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ views of inquiry teaching and their responses to teacher educators’ feedback on teaching practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(4), 347-359.