The Effectiveness of Using 3D Printing Technology in STEM Project-Based Learning Activities
More details
Hide details
Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, TAIWAN
Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology, National Central University, Chungli, TAIWAN
Publication date: 2018-09-28
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(12):em1633
Engineering design process has been recognized as one of the crucial parts of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. However, when focusing on engineering design process, STEM education at the Kindergarten-12 level often neglects the role of modeling in engineering design process. The characteristic of rapid prototyping of 3D printing technology could be utilized in supporting modeling during engineering design process. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of application of 3D printing technology to STEM project-based learning activities in developing students’ understanding regarding engineering design process, particularly their understanding of modeling. This study employed a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. A series of knowledge structure analyses showed that in terms of knowledge structures for modeling in engineering design process, the experimental group explained better than the control group in terms of information processing strategies after the teaching experiment.
Aguirre-Munoz, Z., & Pantoya, M. (2016). Engineering literacy and engagement in Kindergarten classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 630-654.
Anderson, O. R., & Demetrius, O. J. (1993). A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents’ narrative using science content. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 953-969.
Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359-379.
Blikstein, P., Kabayadondo, Z., Martin, A., Fields, D. (2017). An assessment instrument of technological literacies in makerspaces and fablabs. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 149-175.
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971–1002.
Brown, Q., & Burge, J. D. (2014, June). Motivate: Bringing out the fun with 3D printing and e-textiles for middle and high-school girls. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Bursic, K., Shuman, L., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2011). Improving student attainment of ABET outcomes using model-eliciting activities (MEAs). Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Cardella, M. E., Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Turns, J. (2002). Engineering student design processes: Look at evaluation practices across problems. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Montreal, Quebec.
Clewell, B. C., & Braddock, J. (2000). Influences on minority participation in mathematics, science, and engineering. In G. Campbell Jr., R. Denes, & C. Morrison (Eds.), Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise (pp. 89–137). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Clough, G. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Engineering (NAE).
Cohen, B. (2018). Teaching STEM after school: Correlates of instructional comfort. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 246-255.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Crismond, D. (2001). Learning and using science ideas when doing investigate-and-redesign tasks: A study of naive, novice, and expert designers doing constrained and scaffolded design work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 791–820.
Diefes-Dux, H., Bowman, K., Zawojewski, J., & Hjalmarson, M. (2006). Quantifying aluminum crystal size. Part 1: The model eliciting activity. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 7(1/2), 51–63.
Dillon, P., and T. Howe. (2007). An epistemology of presence and reconceptualisation in design education. Interchange, 38(1), 69–88.
Doerr, H. M., Ärlebäck, J. B., Costello Staniec, A. (2014). Design and effectiveness of modeling-based mathematics in a summer bridge program. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 92-114.
Douglas, J., Iversen, E., & Kalyandurg, C. (2004). Engineering in the K-12 classroom: An analysis of current practices and guidelines for the future. Retrieved from
Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S.P., Sorensen, C. D. (1997). A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-based capstone courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 17-28.
Fleer, M. (2000). Working technologically: Investigations into how young children design and make during technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 43–59.
Flower, T. (2014). Growing the engineering education to employment pipeline: reflections and future directions. In A. Bainbridge, Z. T. Qi, & G. S. Gupta (Eds.), Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (25th: 2014). Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Te Papa Tongarewa National Museum of Wellington, New Zealand.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill International Edition.
Han, S., Capraro, R., Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of students factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113.
Horowitz, S. S., & Schultz, P. H. (2014). Printing space: Using 3D printing of digital terrain models in geosciences education and research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(1), 138-145.
International Technology Education Association (ITEA), ed. (2000/2002). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
Johnsey, R. (1995). The place of the process skill making in design and technology: Lessons from research into the way primary children design and make. In Proceedings of the IDATER95: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University of Technology.
Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. Zentralblatt fu¨ r Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(3), 302–310.
Kean, A., Miller, R., Self, B., Moore, T., Olds, B., & Hamilton, E. (2008). Identifying robust student misconceptions in thermal science using model-eliciting activities. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kimmel, H., J. Carpinelli, L. B. Alexander, and R. Rockland. (2006). Bringing engineering into k-12 schools: A problem looking for solutions? In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Chicago, IL.
Kist, A. A. (2014). Supporting student engagement with capstone project presentations. In A. Bainbridge, Z. T. Qi, & G. S. Gupta (Eds.), Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (25th: 2014). Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Te Papa Tongarewa National Museum of Wellington, New Zealand.
Kolodner, J. L., P. J. Camp, D. Crismond, B. Fasse, J. Gray, J. Holbrook, S. Puntambekar, and M. Ryan. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design™ into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.
Kostakis, V., Niaros, V., & Giotitsas, C. (2014). Open source 3D printing as a means of learning: An educational experiment in two high schools in Greece. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 118-128.
Lesh, R. A., & Doerr, H. M. (Eds.). (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., Yoon, C., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). John Dewey revisited – Making mathematics practical versus making practice mathematical. In R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 313–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linn, M. (2003). Technology and science education: starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 727–58.
Massachusetts Department of Education (2016). Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. Retrieved from
Moore, T. J., Miller, R. L., Lesh, R. A., Stohlmann, M. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2013). Modeling in engineering: The role of representational fluency in students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 141-178.
Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2006). The role of functionality in the mental representations of engineering students: Some differences in the early stages of expertise. Cognitive Science, 30(1), 65–93.
National Science Foundation. (2006). NSB science and engineering indicators report. Retrieved from
Nehdi, M. (2002). Crisis of civil engineering education in information technology age: analysis and prospects. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 128(3), 131-137.
Raju, P. K., & Clayson, A. (2010). The future of STEM education: An analysis of two national reports. Journal of STEM Education, 11(5&6), 25-28.
Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2003). Gender and physics. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 509–536.
Ridgely, J., & Self, B. (2011). Model-eliciting activities in a mechanical engineering experimental methods course. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sadler, T., S. Barab, and B. Scott. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–91.
Scalfani, V. F., & Vaid, T. P. (2014). 3D printed molecules and extended solid models for teaching symmetry and point groups. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1174-1180.
Self, B., & Widmann, J. (2010). Dynamics buzzword bingo: Active/collaborative/ inductive learning, model eliciting activities, and conceptual understanding. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY.
Sinatra, G. M., Mukhopadhyay, A., Allbright, T. N., Marsh, J. A., Polikoff, M. S. (2017). Speedometry: A vehicle for promoting interest and engagement through integrated STEM instruction. The Journal of Educational Research.
Song, T., Becker, K., Gero, J., DeBerard, S., Lawanto, O., & Reeve, E. (2016). Problem decomposition and recomposition in engineering design: A comparison of design behavior between professional engineers, engineering seniors, and engineering freshmen. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 37-56.
Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L., & Steif, P. S. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 279–294.
Strimel, G., & Grubbs, M. E. (2016). Positioning technology and engineering education as a key force in STEM education. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 21-36.
Tsai, C. C. (2001). Probing students’ cognitive structures in science: The use of a flow map method coupled with a meta-listening technique. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 257 - 268.
Tsai, C.-C., & Huang, C.-M. (2002). Exploring students’ knowledge structures in learning science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 163-196.
Wells, J., Lammi, M., Gero, J., Grubbs, M. E., Paretti, M., & Williams, C. (2016). Characterizing design cognition of high school students: Initial analyses comparing those with and without pre-engineering experiences. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 78-91.
Wu, Y.-T. (2013). University students’ knowledge structures and informal reasoning on the use of genetically modified foods: Multidimensional analyses. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1873-1890.
Zubrowski, B. (2002). Integrating science into design technology projects: Using a standard model in the design process. Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 48-67.