RESEARCH PAPER
The Effectiveness of Using Stereoscopic 3D for Proportion Estimation in Product Design Education
Po-Ying Chu 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Tatung University, TAIWAN
2
National Taiwan Normal University, TAIWAN
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Po-Ying Chu   

Tatung University, Taiwan
Online publish date: 2017-10-03
Publish date: 2017-10-03
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2017;13(10):6635–6648
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In product design education, identifying proportion and manipulating proportional relationships are important practices in form-giving training. However, using conventional 2D displays with monocular depth cues to train students with different spatial abilities remains a great challenge. Although, some literature has indicated that stereoscopic 3D (S3D) displays were helpful for depth-related tasks, whether S3D is helpful for proportion estimation is an open question. Therefore, the objective of this research was to study whether using S3D for design department students could assist them in improving their ability to interpret the proportions of products. The independent variables of the experiment included spatial ability, task complexity, and display mode. Spatial ability was a between-subject variable. Students aged 20–25 years were recruited as participants and were categorized into high-, moderate-, and low-performance groups depending on their score on a spatial ability scale. Task complexity and display mode were within-subject variables. In the experiment, three chair styles were used as samples. Digital models of three chairs with distinct proportions were displayed in two conditions: 2D mode with monocular depth cues and S3D mode. Participants were asked to compare the proportions of a physical chair and three digital chairs and then select the digital chair with the correct proportions in the 2D and S3D modes. The dependent variable were the score of selecting the 3D digital models with correct proportions compared to the physical objects. The result indicated that students could perceive proportions more accurately in the S3D mode than in the 2D mode. In particular, when using S3D, participants with low spatial ability demonstrated overall performance that was equal to that of participants with high spatial ability.
 
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Alqahtani, A. S., Daghestani, L. F., & Ibrahim, L. F. (2017). Techniques used to Improve Spatial Visualization Skills of Students in Engineering Graphics Course: A Survey. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 8(3), 91-100.
 
2.
Barrett, T. J., & Hegarty, M. (2014). Interaction design and the role of spatial ability in moderating virtual molecule manipulation performance. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 672-677). Cognitive Science Society Austin, TX.
 
3.
Chen, L. C., Cheng, Y. M., Chu, P. Y., & Sandnes, F. E. (2015, August). Exploring the Interactivity Issues of the Stereoscopic 3D Systems for Design Education. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 23-30). Springer International Publishing.
 
4.
Donelson, F. L. (1990). The Development, Testing, and Use of a Computer Interface To Evaluate an Information Processing Model Describing the Rates of Encoding and Mental Rotation in High School Students of High and Low Spatial Ability.
 
5.
Edelmann, J., Gerjets, P., Mock, P., Schilling, A., & Strasser, W. (2012, January). Face2Face—A system for multi-touch collaboration with telepresence. In Emerging Signal Processing Applications (ESPA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 159-162). IEEE.
 
6.
Escobar, M. M., Junke, B., Holub, J., Hisley, K., Eliot, D., & Winer, E. (2015). Evaluation of monoscopic and stereoscopic displays for visual–spatial tasks in medical contexts. Computers in biology and medicine, 61, 138-143.
 
7.
Guedes, K. B., Guimarães, M., & Méxas, J. G. (2012). Virtual reality using stereoscopic vision for teaching/learning of descriptive geometry. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-Line Learning (pp. 24-30).
 
8.
Kaufmann, H. (2009). Virtual Environments for Mathematics and Geometry Education, Themes in Science and Technology Education, Special Issue: Virtual Reality in Education, 2(1-2), 131 – 152.
 
9.
Kaufmann, H., Steinbügl, K., Dünser, A., & Glück, J. (2005). General training of spatial abilities by geometry education in augmented reality. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine: A Decade of VR, 3, 65-76.
 
10.
Kockro, R. A., Amaxopoulou, C., Killeen, T., Wagner, W., Reisch, R., Schwandt, E., Gutenberg, A., Giese, A., Stofft, E., & Stadie, A. T. (2015). Stereoscopic neuroanatomy lectures using a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger, 201, 91-98.
 
11.
Liang, Y., Lee, A., & Liu, S. (2016). A Study on Design-oriented Demands of VR via ZMET-QFD Model for Industrial Design Education and Students’ Learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1205-1219.
 
12.
Liao, K. H. (2017). The abilities of understanding spatial relations, spatial orientation, and spatial visualization affect 3D product design performance: using carton box design as an example. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 131-147.
 
13.
Lin, C. J., Cheng, L. Y., & Wang, M. C. (2015). Performance of estimating depth in projection based stereoscopic virtual display. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 23(2), 76-83.
 
14.
Lin, H. (2016). Influence of design training and spatial solution strategies on spatial ability performance. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 123-131.
 
15.
Lohman, D. F. (1984). Spatial ability: Individual differences in speed and level (No. TR-9). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Aptitude Research Project, School Of Education.
 
16.
Maeda, Y., Yoon, S. Y., Kim-Kang, G., & Imbrie, P. K. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Revised PSVT:R for measuring first year engineering students’ spatial ability. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 763-776.
 
17.
Marunić, G., & Glažar, V. (2014). Improvement and assessment of spatial ability in engineering education. Engineering Review, 34(2), 139-150.
 
18.
McCormack, A. (1988).Visual/spatial thinking: An element of elementary school science. Council for elementary science international, San Diego State University.
 
19.
McIntire, J. P., & Liggett, K. K. (2014). The (possible) utility of stereoscopic 3d displays for information visualization: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In 3DVis (3DVis), 2014 IEEE VIS International Workshop on (pp. 1-9). Paris, France.
 
20.
Mukai, A., Yamagishi, Y., Hirayama, M. J., Tsuruoka, T., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Effects of stereoscopic 3D contents on the process of learning to build a handmade PC. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 3(3), 491-506.
 
21.
Nagy-Kondor, R. (2017). Spatial Ability: Measurement and Development. In: Khine M. (eds) Visual-spatial Ability in STEM Education. Springer, Cham.
 
22.
Newcombe, N. S., & Stieff, M. (2012). Six myths about spatial thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 955-971.
 
23.
Patterson, C., Cristino, F., Hayward, W. G., & Leek, C. (2012). Stereo information benefits view generalization in object recognition. Journal of Vision, 12(9), 1534-7362.
 
24.
Phillips, K. R., De Miranda, M. A., & Jinseup, T. S. (2009). Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Industrial Design Education, Journal of Technology Studies, 35(2), 47-55.
 
25.
Price, A., & Lee, H. S. (2010). The effect of two-dimensional and stereoscopic presentation on middle school students’ performance of spatial cognition tasks. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), 90-103.
 
26.
Price, C. A., Lee, H. S., Plummer, J. D., SubbaRao, M., & Wyatt, R. (2015). Position Paper On Use Of Stereoscopy To Support Science Learning: Ten Years Of Research. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education (JAESE), 2(1), 17-26.
 
27.
Rampino, L., & Gorno, R. (2011). Teaching Design & Engineering Students how to handle the Form Giving issue. In DS 69: Proceedings of E&PDE 2011, the 13th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, London, UK, 08.-09.09. 2011.
 
28.
Roca-González, C., Martin-Gutierrez, J., García-Dominguez, M. & Carrodeguas, M. d. C. M. (2017). Virtual Technologies to Develop Visual-Spatial Ability in Engineering Students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 441-468.
 
29.
Roth, S. K. (1993). Visualization in Science and the Arts. Art, Science & Visual Literacy: Selected Readings from the 24th Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, 81-85, Pittsburgh, PA.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 363289).
 
30.
Smith, S., Taylor, K., Green, T., Peterson, N., Garrety, C., Kremis, M., & Thompson, A. (2005). Using virtual reality tools in design and technical graphics curricula: An experience in learning. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 69(1), 16-25.
 
31.
Sorby, S. A. (2007). Developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 13(1), 1-11.
 
32.
Styliani, S., Fotis, L., Kostas, K., & Petros, P. (2009). Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. Journal of cultural Heritage, 10(4), 520-528.
 
33.
Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
 
34.
van Beurden, M. H., IJsselsteijn, W. A., & Juola, J. F. (2012). Effectiveness of stereoscopic displays in medicine: a review. 3D Research, 3(1), 1-13.
 
35.
Yang, M. Y., You, M., & Chen, F. C. (2005). Competencies and qualifications for industrial design jobs: implications for design practice, education, and student career guidance. Design studies, 26(2), 155-189.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215