The Effects of Activity Based Learning on Sixth Grade Students’ Achievement and Attitudes towards Mathematics Activities
More details
Hide details
Siirt University, TURKEY
Online publish date: 2018-02-27
Publish date: 2018-02-27
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(5):1963–1977
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of activity based learning on sixth grade students’ mathematics achievement in comparison to traditional learning, and determine their attitudes towards activities. Experimental research design with pretest-posttest control group was applied in the study. The participants, which included 78 sixth grade students, were previously divided into two groups by random assignment. One group received traditional learning and the other group received activity based learning. The study was carried out for four weeks on the mathematics subject of “integers”. For collecting data the mathematics success test and the Likert type attitudes towards mathematics activities scale were used as pretest and posttest. As a result, the academic achievement for both groups were positive increased. On the other hand, while the attitudes towards activities of students’ in the experiment group decreased significantly, they increased in the control group.
1. Ayhan, M. A. (2011). The effect of activity-based mathematics instruction on 8th grade students’ academic success (Unpublished master’s thesis). Başkent University, Institute of Educational Sciences.
2. Bahadır, E., & Özdemir, A. Ş. (2013). The effects of dramatization as a teaching strategy of integer numbers on the achievement and retention levels of students. International Journal Social Science Research, 2(2), 114-136.
3. Bassett, M. M., Martinez, J., & Martin, E. P. (2014). Self-directed activity-based learning and achievement in high school chemistry. Education Research and Perspectives, 41, 73-94.
4. Batdı, V. (2014). The effect of activity-based learning approach on academic achievement (A meta-analytic and thematic study). E-International Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 39-55.
5. Bozkurt, A. (2012). Mathematics teachers’ perceptions of mathematical activities. Education and Science, 37(166), 103-115.
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Scientific Research Methods. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
7. Camci, F. (2012). Effects of activity based teaching grounded on active learning on students’ academic skills and learning process (Unpublished master’s thesis). Adıyaman University, Institute of Sciences.
8. Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 380-400.
9. Case, L. P., Harris, K. R., & Graham, P. (1992). Improving the mathematical problem solving skills of students with learning disabilities, self-regulated strategy development. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 1-9.
10. Doruk, B. K. (2014). The educational approaches of Turkish pre-service elementary mathematics teachers in their first teaching practices: Traditional or constructivist? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(10).
11. Douglas, D. A., & Joke, M. V. (2016). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ learning and teaching of activity-based lessons supported with spreadsheets. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(1), 39-59.
12. Duru, A., Akgün, L., & Özdemir, M. E. (2005). An analysis of primary teacher candidates’ attitude towards mathematics. Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 11, 520- 536.
13. Ehrenberg, R. G., Brewer, D. J., Gamoran, A., & Willms, J. D. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1–30.
14. Eshun, B. (2004). Sex-differences in attitude of students towards mathematics in secondary schools. Mathematics Connection, 4, 1–13.
15. Finlayson, M. (2014). Addressing math anxiety in the classroom. Improving Schools, Vol. 17(1), 99-115.
16. Golji, G. G., & Dangpe, A. K. D. (2016). Activity-based learning strategies (ABLS) as best practice for secondary mathematics teaching and learning. International Advanced Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(9), 106-116.
17. Günay, R. (2013). The effect of different organization of activity based learning content on seventh grade mathematics achievement (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kocaeli University, Institute of Social Sciences.
18. Gürbüz, R., Çatlıoğlu, H., Birgin, O., & Erdem, E. (2010). An investigation of fifth grade students’ conceptual development of probability through activity based instruction: A quasi-experimental. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(2), 1021-1069.
19. Han, S., & Carpenter, D. (2014). Construct validation of student attitude toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project based learning: The case of Korean Middle Grade Students. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(3), 27-41.
20. Harbor-Peters, V.F. (2005). Attitudes and interest of the students to the mathematical sciences in Nigeria. In S.O. Ale, & L.O. Adetula (Eds). Reflective and ıntellective position papers on mathematics education issues. Abuja: Marvelous Mike Ventures Ltd.
21. Hussain, S., Anwar, S., & Majoka, M. I. (2011). Effect of peer group activity-based learning on students’ academic achievement in physics at secondary level. International Journal of Academic Research, 3, 940-944.
22. Johnson, R. L. (1970). Effects of varying concrete activities on achievement of objectives in perimeter, area, and volume by students of grades four, five and six (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado at Boulder, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved from
23. Jordan, L., Miller, M., & Mercer, C. D. (1998). The effects of concrete to semi-concrete to abstract instruction in the acquisition and retention of fraction concepts and skills. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 115–122.
24. Karasar, N. (2007). Scientific research method. Ankara: Nobel Publication Distribution.
25. Kayış, A. (2005). Reliability analysis. In Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), Multivariate statistical techniques with SPSS applied, p. 404-409. Ankara: Asil Publishing Distribution.
26. Kösterelioğlu, İ., & Yapıcı, M. (2016). The effects of activity based learning process on prospective teachers’ perceptions of constructivist learning environment. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1342-1354.
27. Kösterelioğlu, İ., Bayar, A., & Kösterelioğlu M. A. (2014). Activity based learning process on teacher education: A case study. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(2), 1035-1047.
28. Küpçü, A. R. (2012). The effects of activity-based teaching approach on the proportion related problem solving success of middle school students. Ahi Evran University, Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 13(3), 175-206.
29. Link, T., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Fischer, U., & Nuerk, H. C. (2013). Walk the number line - An embodied training of numerical concepts. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 74-84.
30. Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26-47.
31. Malhotra, S., Singh, S. K., Pandey, G.P., Nayyar, S., Sharma, A., & Singh, T. (2015). Study package for CTET (Paper 1). McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited. Green Park Extension, New Delhi.
32. MEB. (2016). Secondary school mathematics 6th grade. Ankara: MEB Talim Terbiye Kurulu.
33. Ocak, G., & Dönmez, P. (2010). The scale of attitude directed towards the application of mathematical activities of the 4th and 5th grade primary school students. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 3(2), 69-82.
34. Öcal, H. A. (2012). Teacher comments about applications related with activity based teaching (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gaziantep University, Institute of Social Science.
35. Olkun, S., & Uçar, Z. T. (2014). Mathematics teaching. Ankara: Educational Book.
36. Peers, I (2006). Statistical analysis for education and psychology research. London: The Falmer Press Taylor & Francis e-Library, pp. 30.
37. Pehlivan, K. B. (2008). A study on pre-service classroom teachers’ socio-cultural properties and their attitudes toward teaching occupation as a subject. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 4(2), 151-168.
38. Ravı, R., & Xaviera, P. (2007). Activity based learning as self-accessing strategy to promote learners’ autonomy. I-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 1(2), 7-9.
39. Riley, N., Luban, D., Holmes, K., Gore, J., & Morgan, P. (2017). Movement-based mathematics: enjoyment and engagement without compromising learning through the easy minds program. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(6):1653-1673.
40. Rubin, R. J., Marcelino, J., Mortel, R., & Lapinid, M. R. C. (2014). Activity-based teaching of integer concepts and its operations. Presented at the DLSU Research Congress March 6-8, 2014. De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
41. Ruff, S.E., & Boes, S.R. (2014). The sum of all fears: The effects of math anxiety on math achievement in fifth grade students and the implications for school counselors. Georgia School Counselors Association Journal, 21(1), 1-10.
42. Shah, I., & Rahat, T. (2014). Effect of activity based teaching method in science. International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences (IJHMS), 2(1), 39-41.
43. Su, C.-H. (2017). The effects of students’ learning anxiety and motivation on the learning achievement in the activity theory based gamified learning environment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1229-1258.
44. Suydam, M. N, & Higgins, J. L. (1977). Activity based learning in elementary school mathematics: Recommendations from Research. ERIC Information Analysis Center for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, Columbus, Ohio.
45. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. P. (2015). Using multivariate statistics (6th edition). M. Baloğlu (Translation Editor). Ankara: Nobel Academy Publishing, 19-20.
46. Yenilmez, K., Girginer, N., & Uzun, O. (2007). Mathematics Anxiety and Attitude Level of Students of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administrator: The Turkey Model. International Mathematical Forum, 2, No. 41, 1997-2021. Retrieved from