RESEARCH PAPER
The Influence of Gender, Learning Background, Participation, and Topic Limitation on the Imagination of Industrial Design Students in Taiwan
Yo-Wen Liang 1
,  
An-Sheng Lee 2  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Ming Chi University of Technology, Department of Communication Design, New Taipei City, TAIWAN
2
National Chiayi University, Department of Wood-Based Materials and Design, Chiayi City, TAIWAN
3
National Taiwan Normal University, Department of Design, Taipei, TAIWAN
4
Toko University, Department of Restaurant Management, Chiayi, TAIWAN
Online publish date: 2017-12-13
Publish date: 2017-12-13
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(3):1011–1022
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In this study, five industrial senior designers are invited to observe and record a required design practice course of an industrial design department of a university for one semester, 18 weeks, each week for 5-6 hours. During the process, the imagination indicators proposed by Vygotsky is adopted in combination with a 5-point Likert scale. The sophomore class, 63 students in total, is observed. The outcome of study indicates that when the topics are with limitation, the gender factor has significant influence during design stages, and the influence of students’ pre-university learning background is significant as well. When the topics are not limited, the influence of the gender factor also appears to be significant. The pre-university learning background has more influence on the performance of imagination and vocational high school graduates do better than regular high school graduates. In the meantime, students with higher level of class participation exhibit better imagination.
 
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Bruce, M., & Cooper, R. (1997). Marketing and design management. London: Intl Thomson Business Press.
 
2.
Chang, W. W. (2010). Design viewpoints of creative life. Technology Development Magazine, 453, 20-29.
 
3.
Cross, N. (1984). Developments in design methodology (ed.). Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
 
4.
Folkmann, M. N. (2013). The aesthetics of imagination in design. Cambridge: MIT Press.
 
5.
Goldschmidt, G. (1994). On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies, 15(2), 158-174. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)90022-1.
 
6.
HaA Design (2016, August). ISO certified design and development. Retrieved from: http://www.haapd.com/.
 
7.
Hitchcock, D. (2009). Non-logical consequence. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 15(28), 1-22. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_7.
 
8.
Holt, T. (1990). Thinking historically: Narrative, imagination, and understanding. College Entrance Examination Board.
 
9.
Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. New York: Simon & Schuster.
 
10.
Lawson, B. R. (2006). How designers think (4th Edition). Oxford: Architectural Press.
 
11.
Liang, K. C. (2008). The issues of project activities influencing design development. Taipei: WuNan.
 
12.
Liang, Y. W., Lee, A. S., & Liu, S. F. (2016). A study on design-oriented demands of VR via ZMET-QFD model for industrial design education and students’ learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1205-1219. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1507a.
 
13.
Liang, Y. W., Liu, S. F., & Zhou, X. B. (2010). Using metaphor elicitation technique to explore designers’ demands in virtual reality. Journal of Art and Design of Huafan University, 6, 165-179.
 
14.
Lin, W. S., Hsu, Y. L., & Liang, C. Y. (2014). The mediator effects of conceiving imagination on academic performance of design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 73-89. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9244-x.
 
15.
Lucas, H. C., Tuschling, B., & Vogel, U. (2003). Hegels enzyklopädisches System der Philosophie. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
 
16.
McKim, R. (1980). Experiences in visual thinking. New York: Brooks/Cole Pub Co. Press.
 
17.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K. H. (2007). Engineering design: a systematic approach. Berlin: Springer.
 
18.
Pezzuti, L., Artistico, D., Chirumbolo, A., Picone, L., & Dowd, S. M. (2014). The relevance of logical thinking and cognitive style to everyday problem solving among older adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 218-223. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.011.
 
19.
Pine II, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the Experience Economy. Harvard Business Review.
 
20.
Shan, C. G., He, M. Q., Bien, S. J., & Wang, H. X. (2002, May). Exploring the design policy. 2002 Proceedings of the Symposium on Design Academic Research Achievements, Taipei.
 
21.
Smith, S. M., Kohn, N. W., & Shah, J. J. (2008). What you see is what you get: effects of provocative stimuli in creative invention. Gero, JS (ed): 2008, The International Workshop on Studying Design Creativity.
 
22.
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). The creative cognitive approach. Cambridge: MIT Press.
 
23.
Su, L. Q. (2002). The icons of non-logical objects for the visually creative expression in western painting (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Pingtung University, Pingtung, Taiwan.
 
24.
Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (1995). Product design and development. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
 
25.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7-97. doi:10.2753/RPO1061-0405280184.
 
26.
Wang, Z. S. (2003). Several problems should be paid attention to in research report. Hanzhong: Hanzhong Education Center.
 
27.
Wieth, M. B., & Zacks, R. T. (2011). Time of day effects on problem solving: when the non-optimal is optimal. Thinking & Reasoning, 17(4), 387-401. doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.625663.
 
28.
Worst, S. J. (2007). Vygotsky’s theory of the creative imagination: a study of the influences on preservice teachers’ creative thinking capacities (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, USA.
 
29.
Wu, S. H. (2002). From manufacturing Taiwan to knowledge of Taiwan (Harvard Business Review on Innovation). Taipei: Global Views.
 
30.
Xu, M. W., & Bien, S. J. (2002, November). Consumption experience mode into the design chain store space planning and application: Sakura cooking as a sample. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Development of Human Factors in Design, Taipei.
 
31.
Yu, D. Z., Lin, W. C., & Wang, J. Q. (2001). Scenario design: new method of product and service design in information age. Taipei: Ten-Yuan.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215