The Rising of Green Society: Low-Carbon Consumption as a Result of Environmental Education in China
Lie’en Weng 1,  
Shuigen Hu 2,  
Zhujun Tao 2,  
Jingrui Xu 2  
More details
Hide details
Department of Public Affairs, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, CHINA
School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, CHINA
Online publish date: 2018-03-15
Publish date: 2018-03-15
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(6):2169–2183
This article analyzes the factors that influence low-carbon consumption of college students, with the purpose of guiding environmental education in Chinese universities. To that end, a theoretical framework is proposed on the basis of interviews with several groups incombination with literature analysis using grounded theory and empirical verification methods. The study finds that external environment changes, individual psychological awareness, individual living habit, product technology development and low-carbon consumption intention are positively related to low-carbon consumption patterns. Finally, this paper points out that cultivating environmental education concepts of college students should make full use of different policy tools and adhere to the following principles: the combination of various policies and measures, the participation of multiple stakeholders, the popularization of low-carbon concepts, the demonstration of governments, the effectiveness of mass media, clearly defined laws and regulations and informal system construction.
1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(3), 273-291.
2. Bohlen, G., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1993). Measuring ecological concern: a multi‐construct perspective. Journal of Marketing Management, 9(4), 415-430.
3. Chen, M. F. (2007). Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: Moderating effects of food-related personality traits. Food Quality and preference, 18(7), 1008-1021.
4. Fraj, E., & Martinez, E. (2007). Ecological consumer behaviour: an empirical analysis. International journal of consumer studies, 31(1), 26-33.
5. Glaser, B. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge.
6. Granit-Dgani, D., Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2017). Theory-based assessment in environmental education: a tool for formative evaluation. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 269-299.
7. Heider, F. (2013). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New Jersey: Psychology Press.
8. Henion, K. E. (1972). The effect of ecologically relevant information on detergent sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 10-14.
9. Lane, B., & Potter, S. (2007). The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consumer attitude–action gap. Journal of cleaner production, 15(11), 1085-1092.
10. Lao, K. F., & Wu, J. (2013). Research on Influencing Mechanism of Consumer Green Consumption Behavior Referring to TPB. Finance and Economics, 2013(2), 91-99.
11. Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2010). Modeling the factors affecting rural consumers’ purchase of organic and free-range produce: A case study of consumers’ from the Island of Arran in Scotland, UK. Food Policy, 35(2), 130-139.
12. Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 49-64. Retrieved from http://www.unternehmenssteuert....
13. Muetzelfeldt, R., Robertson, D., Bundy, A., & Uschold, M. (1989). The use of Prolog for improving the rigour and accessibility of ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling, 46(1-2), 9-34.
14. Steg, L. (2008). Promoting household energy conservation. Energy policy, 36(12), 4449-4453.
15. Stevenson, R. B., Dillon, J. W., Arjen, E. J., & Brody, M. (2013). The evolving characteristics of environmental education research. In: R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.) International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education. Routledge, New York, NY, USA, pp. 512-517.
16. Wang, J. M., & He, A. Z. (2011). Psychological Attribution and Policy Paths of Consumer’s Low Carbon Consumption Behavior: An Exploratory Research Based on Grounded Theory. Nankai Business Review, 2011(4), 80-89.
17. Winett, R. A., Leckliter, I. N., Chinn, D. E., Stahl, B., & Love, S. Q. (1985). Effects of television modeling on residential energy conservation. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 18(1), 33-44. Retrieved from