RESEARCH PAPER
University Students’ Conceptions of Mathematical Symbols and Expressions
Kin Eng Chin 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Flinders University, AUSTRALIA
2
Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Kin Eng Chin   

Flinders University
Online publish date: 2019-04-12
Publish date: 2019-04-12
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2019;15(9):em1748
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Undergraduate mathematics instructors often report that students make careless errors or have not previously learned key mathematical ideas and strategies. The purpose of this study is to explore evidence of an alternative explanation that at least some of these “errors” may result from students’ application of conceptions developed in the narrower contexts of their earlier learning. Analysis of formal printed lecture notes, student work and questionnaire responses is performed. Data collected from two Australia Universities’ first year mathematics students are reported in this paper that explores respondents’ conceptions related to symbolic mathematical expressions in different contexts by using the survey research design. The data were analysed through two lenses in order to both identify likely supportive and problematic conceptions and also distill the aspects of symbolic expressions contributing to this classification. The findings show that students’ errors patterns are associated to problematic conceptions that might arise from contexts previously encountered by students. More than 50% of the recorded errors related to sin-1(x) by University 1 students are linked to problematic conceptions. This study is significant because it shows that it is important to explicitly address such potentially problematic conceptions in order to help students bridge the transition between contexts and this may be done through lecture notes.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Bardini, C., & Pierce, R. (2015). Assumed knowledge: the challenge of symbols. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 23(1), 1-9.
 
2.
Bardini, C., Pierce, R., & Vincent J. (2015). Contemplating symbolic literacy in first year mathematics students. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics Education in the Margins: Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 77- 84.
 
3.
Chin, K. E. (2013). Making sense of mathematics: supportive and problematic conceptions with special reference to trigonometry (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Warwick, England. Retrieved from http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/5840....
 
4.
Chin, K. E. (2014). Supportive and problematic aspects in mathematical thinking over the longer term. In S. Oesterle, C. Nicol, P. Liljedahl, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the 36th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 6, 41. Vancouver, Canada: PME.
 
5.
Chin, K. E., & Tall, D. O. (2012). Making sense of mathematics through perception, operation and reason: The case of trigonometric functions. In Tai-Yih Tso (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 264. Taipei, Taiwan: PME.
 
6.
Chubb, I., Findlay, C., Du, L., Burmester, B., & Kusa, L. (2012). Mathematics, engineering and science in the national interest. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.....
 
7.
Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity & flexibility in successful mathematical thinking. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Conference for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 72-79.
 
8.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2007). A framework for uncovering the way a textbook may position the mathematics teacher. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 8-14.
 
9.
Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2006). The rationality debate: Application of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 105-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
10.
Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. (2008). Procedural embodiment and magic in linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
11.
Martinez-Planell, R., & Trigueros, M. (2012). Students’ understanding of the general notion of a function of two variables. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
12.
Martinez-Planell, R., Trigueros, M., & McGee, D. (2015). On students’ understanding of the differential calculus of functions of two variables The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 38, 57-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat....
 
13.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles, standards and expectations: Principles and standards for school mathematics.
 
14.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2009). Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
 
15.
Pierce, R., & Bardini, C. (2016, July). Déjà vu in mathematics: what does it look like? Paper presented at the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education Hamburg, Germany.
 
16.
Pimm, D. (1991). Communicating mathematically. In K. Durkin, & B. Shire (Eds.), Language in Mathematical Education: Research and Practice, 17–23.
 
17.
Quinnell, L., & Carter, M. (2012). Greek or not: the use of symbols and abbreviations in mathematics. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 68(2), 34–40.
 
18.
Serfati, M. (2005). La révolution symbolique. La constitution de l’écriture symbolique mathématique. Paris. Pétra.
 
19.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0030....
 
20.
Shepherd, M., Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2012). University students’ reading of their first-year mathematics textbook. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(3), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/109860....
 
21.
Sherin, B. L. (1996). The symbolic basis of physical intuition: A study of two symbol systems in physics instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
 
22.
Singhal, P. (2018, March 24). HSC students abandoning high-level subjects. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/educati....
 
23.
Smith, J. P., DiSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A contructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327....
 
24.
Sullivan, P., & Mousley, J. (2005). Quality mathematics teaching: Describing some key components. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0321....
 
25.
Tall, D. O. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically.
 
26.
Tall, D. O., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with special reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0030....
 
27.
Thompson, P. W., Cheepurupalli, R., Hardin, B., Lienert, C., & Selden, A. (2010, March). Cultivating Symbol Sense in Your Calculus Class. Paper presented at the IM&E Workshop, San Diego, CA. Retrieved from http://ime.math.arizona.edu/20....
 
28.
Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2010). Geometrical representations in the learning of two-variable functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649....
 
29.
Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2011). How are graphs of two variable functions taught? In L. R. Wiest & T. Lamberg (Eds.). Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://pegasus.uprm.edu/rmplan....
 
30.
Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority (2016). VCE mathematics Study Design. Retrieved from http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Doc....
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215