RESEARCH PAPER
Utilizing Wikis and a LINE Messaging App in Flipped Classrooms
Tung-Liang Chen 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Chung-Hua University, Hsinchu, TAIWAN
Online publish date: 2017-12-23
Publish date: 2017-12-23
 
EURASIA J. Math., Sci Tech. Ed 2018;14(3):1063–1074
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this research is to identify students’ perception of the utilization of wikis, LINE, and flipped teaching strategies in a Research Methodology course at a university in Taiwan. Q-methodology, a combination of qualitative and quantitative research, was employed for this study, and sixteen participants were asked to rank-order 30 statements related to the integration of wikis and LINE in a flipped classroom. Correlation, a centroid factor analysis, and judgmental rotation were used to identify the significant factors. The two factors that represented groups of participants with a similar perception were extracted and the results were as follows; (1) learners could be divided into those with a strong positive feeling about group-based activities and self-paced learning (Collaborative Achiever) and those who had a positive reaction to collaboration, but expressed concern about tension caused by competition (Collaborative Competitor), and (2) all the participants agreed that they were highly engaged and motivated when using Wikispaces and LINE in the flipped classroom based on the advantages of a timely and easy-to-use IT environment, self-regulated learning, virtual community companion, collaborative work, and the building and sharing of knowledge. The theoretical and practical implications of the results were discussed.
 
REFERENCES (47)
1.
Abdekhodaee, A., Chase, A.-M., & Ross, B. (2017). Wikis for group work: Encouraging transparency, benchmarking, and feedback. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 15- 31. doi:10.14742/ajet.2829.
 
2.
Altanopoulou, P., & Tselios, N. (2017). Assessing acceptance toward wiki technology in the context of Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), 127-149. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2995.
 
3.
Altanopoulou, P., Tselios, N., Katsanos, C., Georgoutsou, M., & Panagiotaki, M. A. (2015). Wiki-mediated activities in higher education: Evidence-based analysis of learning effectiveness across three studies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 511-522.
 
4.
Aşıksoy, G., & Özdamlı, F. (2016). Flipped Classroom adapted to the ARCS Model of Motivation and applied to a Physics Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1589-1603. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1251a.
 
5.
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006.
 
6.
Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 134-142.
 
7.
Biasutti, M., & EL-Deghaidy, H. (2012). Using wiki in teacher education: Impact on knowledge management processes and student satisfaction. Computers & Education, 59(3), 861-872. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.009.
 
8.
Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 91-138. doi:10.15133/j.os.1993.002.
 
9.
Brown, S. R. (1996). Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 561-567. doi:10.1177/104973239600600408.
 
10.
Chen, L., Chen, T. L., & Chen, N. S. (2015). Students’ perspectives of using cooperative learning in a flipped statistics classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 621-640.
 
11.
Chen, S. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hsiao, C. C. (2015). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1096-1112.
 
12.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004.
 
13.
Chia, H., & Pritchard, A. (2014). Using a virtual learning community (VLC) to facilitate a cross-national science research collaboration between secondary school students. Computers & Education, 79, 1-15. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.005.
 
14.
Chung, J., & Huang, F. (2016, February 2). LINE tope other social media among Taiwanese smartphone owners. Focus Taiwan. Retrieved on October 10, 2017 from http://focustaiwan.tw/news/ast....
 
15.
Davies, R., Dean, D., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Education Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6.
 
16.
Doss, S. K., Carstens, D. S. & Kies, S. (2016). Episodic Social Media Impact on Users. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 4(3), 273-286. doi:10.1504/IJSMILE.2016.079505.
 
17.
Hsieh, S. W. & Wu, M. P. (2013). Exploring learning performance toward cognitive approaches of virtual companion system in line app for m-learning, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4), 337-346. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1235a.
 
18.
Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.967701.
 
19.
Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. (2017). A systematic review of research on flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of.
 
20.
Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/bjet.12548.
 
21.
Kearney, M., Burden, K., & Rai, T. (2015). Investigating teachers’ adoption of signature mobile pedagogies. Computers & Education, 80, 48-57. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.009.
 
22.
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003.
 
23.
Kolski, D., Heuwieser, W., & Arlt, S. (2015). Use and Future of Wiki Systems in Veterinary Education?--A Survey of Lecturers in German-Speaking Countries. Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung, 32(5), Doc54. doi:10.3205%2Fzma000996.
 
24.
Lee, B. (2017). TELL us ESP in a Flipped Classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(8), 4995–5007. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00978a.
 
25.
Lee, H., & Bonk, C. J. (2014). Collaborative Learning in the Workplace: Practical Issues and Concerns. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 7(2), 10-17. doi:10.3991/ijac.v7i2.3850.
 
26.
Leuf, B. & Cunningham, W. (2001). The wiki way: Quick collaboration on the web. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.
 
27.
Liou, W. K., Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2016).Beyond the Flipped Classroom: A Highly Interactive Cloud-Classroom (HIC) Embedded into Basic Materials Science Courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 460-473. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9606-8.
 
28.
Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F. T., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classroom: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50-73. doi:10.1016%2Fj.edurev.2017.08.002.
 
29.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
 
30.
Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85–87.
 
31.
Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 544–561. doi:10.1111/bjet.12057.
 
32.
Schultz, D., Duffield, S., Rasmussen, S. C., & Wageman, J. (2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1334–1339. doi:10.1021/ed400868x.
 
33.
Shih, R. C., Lee, C. & Cheng, T. F. (2015). Effects of English spelling learning experience through a mobile LINE APP for college students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2634-2638. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.945.
 
34.
Shih, W. L., & Tsai, C. Y. (2017). Students’ perception of a flipped classroom approach to facilitating online project-based learning in marketing research courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 32-49. doi:10.14742/ajet.2884.
 
35.
Snodgrass, S. (2011). Wiki activities in blended learning for health professional students: Enhancing critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 563-580. doi:10.14742/ajet.938.
 
36.
Stapa, S. H., & Shaari, A.H. (2012). Understanding online communicative language features in social networking environment. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(3), 817-830.
 
37.
Stellefson, M., Hanik, B., Chaney, J. D., & Tennant, B. (2012). Analysis of eHealth search perspectives among female college students in the health professions using Q methodology. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(2), e60. doi:10.2196/jmir.1969.
 
38.
Van de Bogart, W., & Wichadee, S. (2015). Exploring students’ intention to use LINE for academic purposes based on technology acceptance model. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3), 65-85. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.1894.
 
39.
Wang, C. C., & Greenwood, K. M. (2015). Chinese nursing students’ culture-related learning styles and behaviours: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Science, 2(3), 253-258. doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.07.009.
 
40.
Wang, Y., Fang, W-C., Han, J., & Chen, N-S. (2016). Exploring the affordances of WeChat for facilitating teaching, social and cognitive presence in semi-synchronous language exchange. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 18-37. doi:10.14742/ajet.2640.
 
41.
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. London: Sage.
 
42.
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using Wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. doi:.
 
43.
Wheeler, S., & Wheeler, D. (2009). Using wikis to promote quality learning in teacher training. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(1), 1-10. doi:10.1080/17439880902759851.
 
44.
Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P. & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987-995. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00799.x.
 
45.
Yeh, R. (2017, August 17). Live broadcast on mobile messaging giant LINE now available. Taiwan News. Retrieved on October 20, 2017 from https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/....
 
46.
Yueh, H. P., Huang, J. Y., & Chang, C. (2015). Exploring factors affecting students’ continued Wiki use for individual and collaborative learning: An extended UTAUT perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 16-31. doi:10.14742/ajet.170.
 
47.
Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313-340. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274.
 
eISSN:1305-8223
ISSN:1305-8215