• Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-learning theoretical framework. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 292-307.
• Bellavista, P., Corradi, A., Fanelli, M., & Foschini, L. (2012). A survey of context data distribution for mobile ubiquitous systems. Acm Computing Surveys, 44(4), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1145/2333112.2333119.
• Broekens, J., & Brinkman, W. (2013). Affect Button: A method for reliable and valid affective self-report. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(6), 641-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.02.003.
• Buchholz, T., Küpper, A., & Schiffers, M. (2003). Quality of context: what it is and why we need it. Proceedings of the 10th Workshop of the OpenView University Association: OVUA’03.
• Calvo, R., & D’Mello, S. (2010). Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1(1), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.1.
• Chang, C. C., Liang C. Y., Chou, P. N., & Lin, G. Y. (2017). Is game-based learning better in flow experience and various types of cognitive load than non-game-based learning? Perspective from multimedia and media richness. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.031.
• Chen, S. C., Yen, D. C., & Hwang, M. (2012). Factors influencing the continued intention to the usage of Web 2.0: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 933-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.014.
• Chu, T. H., & Chen, Y. Y. (2016). With good we become good: understanding e-learning adoption by theory of planned behavior and group influences. Computers & Education, 92–93, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.013.
• Clark, L. M., & Wrona, S. (2016). A sensory & emotional experience: pediatric chronic pain & mental health. Pain Management Nursing, 17(2), 97-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2016.02.020.
• Dong, Y., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic gdm with preference relation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 45(4), 780-792. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2014.2336808.
• Dyson, R., & Renk, K. (2006). Freshmen Adaptation to University Life: Depressive Symptoms, Stress and Coping. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(10), 1231-1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20295.
• Hannigan, B., Edwards, D., & Burnard, P. (2004). Stress and Stress Management in Clinical Psychology: Findings from a Systematic Review. Journal of Mental Health, June, 13(3), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230410001700871.
• Harrati, N., Bouchrika, I., Tari, A., & Ladjailia, A. (2016). Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 463-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.051.
• Hwang, Y. J., Al-Arabiat, M., Shin, D. H., & Lee, Y. H. (2016). Understanding information proactiveness and the content management system adoption in pre-implementation stage. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.025.
• Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.007.
• Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continued intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54, 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002.
• Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319509526110.
• Li, Z., Wen, G., & Xie, N. (2015). An approach to fuzzy soft sets in decision making based on grey relational analysis and dempster–shafer theory of evidence: an application in medical diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 64(3), 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2015.05.002.
• Lin, J. L., & Lin, C. L. (2002). The use of the orthogonal array with grey relational analysis to optimize the electrical discharge machining process with multiple performance characteristics. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 42(2), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00107-9.
• Liu, Y. C. & Huang, Y. M. (2015). Using the UTAUT Model to Examine the Acceptance Behavior of Synchronous Collaboration to Support Peer Translation. JALT CALL Journal, 11(1), 77-91.
• Malek, A., Ebrahimnejad, S., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2017). An improved hybrid grey relational analysis approach for green resilient supply chain network assessment. Sustainability, 9(8), 1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081433.
• Manzoor, A. (2010). Quality of context in pervasive systems: models, techniques, and thesis, applications. PhD School of Computer Science, Wien TU.
• Moridis, C., & Economides, A. (2008). Toward Computer-Aided Affective Learning Systems: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(4), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.39.4.a.
• Ortigosa, A., Martín, J., & Carro, R. (2014). Sentiment analysis in Facebook and its application to e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 527-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.024.
• Reyes-Aguilar, A., & Barrios, F. A. (2016). A preliminary study of sex differences in emotional experience. Psychological Reports, 118(2), 337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116633350.
• Sheikh, K., Wegdam, M., & Sinderen, M. V. (2007). Middleware Support for Quality of Context in Pervasive Context-Aware Systems. IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (Vol.13, pp.461-466). https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2007.81.
• Sinclair, P., Kable, A., & Levettjones, T. (2016). The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 57(1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.011.
• Wang, L., Sharkh, S., Chipperfield, A., & Cruden, A. (2017). Dispatch of vehicle-to-grid battery storage using an analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(4), 2952-2965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2591559.
• Zhou, W., & Xu, Z. (2016). Asymmetric hesitant fuzzy sigmoid preference relations in the analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences, 358–359, 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.04.003.

Vancouver

Wang H, Chang T. A New Mental Experience Quantification and Emotion Prediction Model for E-Learning Users. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(6):2623-8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90259

APA

Wang, H., & Chang, T. (2018). A New Mental Experience Quantification and Emotion Prediction Model for E-Learning Users. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2623-2638. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90259

AMA

Wang H, Chang T. A New Mental Experience Quantification and Emotion Prediction Model for E-Learning Users. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(6), 2623-2638. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90259

Chicago

Wang, Hui, and Ting-Cheng Chang. "A New Mental Experience Quantification and Emotion Prediction Model for E-Learning Users". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 6 (2018): 2623-2638. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90259

Harvard

Wang, H., and Chang, T. (2018). A New Mental Experience Quantification and Emotion Prediction Model for E-Learning Users. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), pp. 2623-2638. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90259

MLA

Wang, Hui et al. "A New Mental Experience Quantification and Emotion Prediction Model for E-Learning Users". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 6, 2018, pp. 2623-2638. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90259