• Abramovich, S. (2014). Revisiting mathematical problem solving and posing in the digital era: Toward pedagogically sound uses of modern technology. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(7), 1034-1052.
• Bell, R. L., Gess-Newsome, J., & Luft, J. (2008). Technology in the secondary science classroom: NSTA Press.
• Beneš, P., Rusek, M., & Kudrna, T. (2015). Tradice a současný stav pomůckového zabezpečení edukačního chemického experimentu v České republice. Chemické Listy, 109(2), 159-162.
• Eilks, I., Wittec, T., & Pietzner, V. (2009). A Critical Discussion of The Efficacy of Using Visual Learning Aids From The Internet To Promote Understanding, Illustrated With Examples Explaining The Daniell Voltaic Cell. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 145-152.
• Ersoy, M., & Akbulut, Y. (2014). Cognitive and affective implications of persuasive technology use on mathematics instruction. Computers & Education, 75, 253-262. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.009.
• Filippoupoliti, A., & Koliopoulos, D. (2014). Informal and non-formal education: An outline of History of Science in museums. Science & Education, 23(4), 781-791. doi: 10.1007/s11191-014-9681-2.
• Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for Life in Digital Age. Amsterdam: Springer International Publishing.
• Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6-30. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954.
• Jančaříková, K. (2017). Teaching Aids and Work with Models in e Learning Environments. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(3), 244-258.
• Kim, M., & Aktan, T. (2014). How to Enlarge the Scope of the Curriculum Integration of Mathematics and Science (CIMAS): A Delphi Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 455-469. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1115a.
• Král, L., & Řezníčková, D. (2013). The proliferation and implementation of GIS as an educational tool at gymnasiums/grammar schools in Czechia. Geografie, 118(3), 265-283.
• Lebedeva, O., & Zaitseva, L. (2014). Question Answering Systems in Education and their Classifications. Paper presented at the Joint International Conference on Engineering Education & International Conference on Information Technology.
• Libman, D., & Huang, L. (2013). Chemistry on the Go: Review of Chemistry Apps on Smartphones. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(3), 320-325. doi:10.1021/ed300329e.
• OECD. (2016). Pisa 2015 Results (Volume 1): Excellence and Equity in Education Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en.
• Pence, H. E., & Williams, A. J. (2016). Big data and chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(3), 504-508. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00524.
• Rusek, M. & Dlabola, Z. (2011). “Projectivity” of Projects and Ways of its Achievement. Project-Based Education in Chemistry and Related Fields, IX, 12-23.
• Rusek, M., Stárková, D., Chytrý, V., & Bílek, M. (2017). Adoption of ICT Innovations by Secondary School Teachers and Pre-service Teachers within Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 510-523.
• Sha, L., Looi, C. K., Chen, W., & Zhang, B. H. (2012). Understanding mobile learning from the perspective of self-regulated learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 366-378. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00461.x.
• Weisstein, E. (2014). Computable Data, Mathematics, and Digital Libraries in Mathematica and Wolfram Alpha. In S. M. Watt, J. H. Davenport, A. P. Sexton, P. Sojka & J. Urban (Eds.), Intelligent Computer Mathematics: International Conference, CICM 2014, Coimbra, Portugal, July 7-11, 2014. Proceedings (pp. 26-29). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

APA

Rusek, M., & Jančařík, A. (2017). Analysis of Ambiguous Information about Chemical Compounds in Online Databases. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6533-6543. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78095

Vancouver

Rusek M, Jančařík A. Analysis of Ambiguous Information about Chemical Compounds in Online Databases. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(10):6533-43. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78095

AMA

Rusek M, Jančařík A. Analysis of Ambiguous Information about Chemical Compounds in Online Databases. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(10), 6533-6543. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78095

Chicago

Rusek, Martin, and Antonín Jančařík. "Analysis of Ambiguous Information about Chemical Compounds in Online Databases". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 10 (2017): 6533-6543. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78095

Harvard

Rusek, M., and Jančařík, A. (2017). Analysis of Ambiguous Information about Chemical Compounds in Online Databases. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), pp. 6533-6543. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78095

MLA

Rusek, Martin et al. "Analysis of Ambiguous Information about Chemical Compounds in Online Databases". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 10, 2017, pp. 6533-6543. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78095