Citizens’ views on home experiments in the context of a chemistry citizen science project

Mientje Lüsse; Frauke Brockhage; Marco Beeken; Verena Pietzner

doi:10.29333/ejmste/12246

Full Text (PDF)

Mientje Lüsse ¹ , Frauke Brockhage ² , Marco Beeken ² , Verena Pietzner ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, GERMANY² University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, GERMANY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Citizen science has gained importance in recent years and revealed great potential, especially regarding science learning and environmental education. However, little is known about ways of supporting individual learning processes within citizen science. With this in mind, a home experiment set, the Nitrogen Box, was developed within a chemistry citizen science project on nitrogen pollution of water bodies. The aim of the box was primarily to deepen the subject matter and to sensitize the citizens to the topic. To gain deeper insights into the usability and added value of home experiments in a citizen science context, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten citizens. Analysis of these interviews revealed that the nitrogen box contributed to a consolidation and deepening of knowledge of the nitrogen problem in Northwest Germany. Home experiment sets like Nitrogen Box can motivate and enable citizens to engage more deeply with the scientific topic in the future, to reflect on it and discuss it. We discuss how heterogeneity of the target group presents challenges for designing citizen science projects and provide recommendations for the future projects.

Keywords

adult education
citizen science
home experiments
nitrogen pollution
public participation in scientific research

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2022, Volume 18, Issue 8, Article No: em2142

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12246

Publication date: 25 Jul 2022

Article Views: 1002

Article Downloads: 669

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Affeldt, F., Tolppanen, S., Aksela, M., & Eilks, I. (2017). The potential of the non-formal educational sector for supporting chemistry learning and sustainability education for all students–A joint perspective from two cases in Finland and Germany. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00212A
Aivelo, T., & Huovelin, S. (2020). Combining formal education and citizen science: A case study on students’ perceptions of learning and interest in an urban rat project. Environmental Education Research, 26(3), 324-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1727860
Baptista, M., Reis, P., & Andrade, V. de (2018). Let’s save the bees! An environmental activism initiative in elementary school. Visions for Sustainability, 9, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/2772
Bela, G., Peltola, T., Young, J. C., Balázs, B., Arpin, I., Pataki, G., Hauck, J., Kelemen, E., Kopperoinen, L., Van Herzele, A., Keune, H., Hecker, S., Suskevics, M., Roy, H. E., Itkonen, P., Külvik, M., Laszlo, M., Basnou, C., Pino, J., & Bonn, A. (2016). Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation Biology, 30(5), 990-999. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12762
Bishop, I. J., Warner, S., van Noordwijk, T. C. G. E., Nyoni, F. C., & Loiselle, S. (2020). Citizen science monitoring for sustainable development goal indicator 6.3.2 in England and Zambia. Sustainability, 12(24), 10271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410271
Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009a). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED519688
Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009b). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977-984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
Bowser, A., Cooper, C., Sherbinin, A. de, Wiggins, A., Brenton, P., Chuang, T.‑R., Faustman, E., Haklay, M. (M.), & Meloche, M. (2020). Still in need of norms: The state of the data in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.303
Brockhage, F., Lüsse, M., Pietzner, V., & Beeken, M. (2021). Citizen science & schule. Wie Schülerprojekte die Forschung zu Themen der Nachhaltigkeit vorantreiben können [Citizen Science & School. How student projects can promote research on sustainability]. Naturwissenschaften Im Unterricht Chemie, 32(183), 8-15.
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099-1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069483
Chandler, M., See, L., Copas, K., Bonde, A. M., López, B. C., Danielsen, F., Legind, J. K., Masinde, S., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Newman, G., Rosemartin, A., & Turak, E. (2017). Contribution of citizen science towards international biodiversity monitoring. Biological Conservation, 213, 280-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.004
Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176(1), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5
Crall, A. W., Jordan, R., Holfelder, K., Newman, G. J., Graham, J., & Waller, D. M. (2013). The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 22(6), 745-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511434894
Crall, A. W., Newman, G. J., Stohlgren, T. J., Holfelder, K. A., Graham, J., & Waller, D. M. (2011). Assessing citizen science data quality: An invasive species case study. Conservation Letters, 4(6), 433-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00196.x
Cronje, R., Rohlinger, S., Crall, A., & Newman, G. (2011). Does participation in citizen science improve scientific literacy? A study to compare assessment methods. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 10(3), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2011.603611
De Vries, T., Martin, J. [Johannes], & Paschmann, A. (2006). Heimexperimente–Ein erprobtes Projekt zum Thema Elektrochemie in der Sek. II [Home experiments–A tried and tested project on electrochemistry in upper secondary education]. CHEMKON, 13(4), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/ckon.200610047
Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., Philips, T., & Purcell, K. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1890/110236
Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., & Bonter, D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41(1), 149-172. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
Dillon, J., Stevenson, R. B., & Wals, A. E. J. (2016). Introduction to the special section moving from citizen to civic science to address wicked conservation problems. Conservation Biology, 30(3), 450-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12689
Domenici, V. (2020). Distance education in chemistry during the epidemic COVID-19. Substantia, 4(1), 961. https://doi.org/10.13128/SUBSTANTIA-961
Galloway, J. N., Aber, J. D., Erisman, J. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Howarth, R. W., Cowling, E. B., & Cosby, B. J. (2003). The nitrogen cascade. BioScience, 53(4), 341. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2
Gendjova, A. (2007). Enhancing students’ interest in chemistry by home experiments. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(3), 5-15.
Hegarty, S., Hayes, A., Regan, F., Bishop, I., & Clinton, R. (2021). Using citizen science to understand river water quality while filling data gaps to meet United Nations sustainable development goal 6 objectives. The Science of the Total Environment, 783, 146953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146953
Herodotou, C., Aristeidou, M., Sharples, M., & Scanlon, E. (2018). Designing citizen science tools for learning: Lessons learnt from the iterative development of nQuire. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0072-1
Hiller, S. E., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). The effect of a horseshoe crab citizen science program on middle school student science performance and STEM career motivation. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 302-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12081
Kastens, B., & Newig, J. (2007). The water framework directive and agricultural nitrate pollution: Will great expectations in Brussels be dashed in Lower Saxony? European Environment, 17(4), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.446
Kelemen-Finan, J., Scheuch, M., & Winter, S. (2018). Contributions from citizen science to science education: an examination of a biodiversity citizen science project with schools in Central Europe. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2078-2098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1520405
Kennepohl, D. (2021). Laboratory activities to support online chemistry courses: A literature review. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 99(11), 851-859. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-2020-0506
Kirschke, S., Häger, A., Kirschke, D., & Völker, J. (2019). Agricultural nitrogen pollution of freshwater in Germany. The governance of sustaining a complex problem. Water, 11(12), 2450. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122450
Kruse, K., Knickmeier, K., Honorato‐Zimmer, D., Gatta‐Rosemary, M., Weinmann, A., Kiessling, T., Schöps, K., Thiel, M., & Parchmann, I. (2020). Following the pathways of plastic litter–An international citizen science project for promoting K12 students’ scientific literacy. CHEMKON, 27(7), 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/ckon.201800093
Levy, B. L. M., Oliveira, A. W., & Harris, C. B. (2021). The potential of “civic science education”: Theory, research, practice, and uncertainties. Science Education, 105(6), 1053-1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21678
Lieb, S. (1991). Principles of adult learning. https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/LIEB%201991%20Principles%20of%20adult%20learning.pdf
Lüsse, M., Brockhage, F., Beeken, M., & Pietzner, V. (2022a). Citizen science and its potential for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2067365
Lüsse, M., Brockhage, F., Beeken, M., & Pietzner, V. (2022b). Partizipative Forschung zur Nitratbelastung: Der Stickstoffproblematik auf der Spur (Themenheft 4: Stickstoff-Box - Begleitheft) [Participatory Research on Nitrate Pollution: Tracking the Nitrogen Problem (Theme Booklet 4: Nitrogen Box - Accompanying Booklet)]. Universität Osnabrück. https://doi.org/10.48693/125
Lüsse, M., Brockhage, F., Beeken, M., & Pietzner, V. (2022c). Partizipative Forschung zur Nitratbelastung: Der Stickstoffproblematik auf der Spur (Themenheft 5: Stickstoff-Box - Experimentierheft)[ Participatory Research on Nitrate Pollution: Tracking the Nitrogen Problem (Theme Booklet 4: Nitrogen Box - Experimental Booklet)]. Universität Osnabrück. https://doi.org/10.48693/126
Lyall, R., & Patti, A. F. (2010). Taking the chemistry experience home–Home experiments or “kitchen chemistry”. In D. Kennepohl, & L. Shaw (Eds.), Accessible elements: Teaching science online and at a distance (pp. 83-108). Athabasca University Press.
Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Basics and techniques]. Beltz.
O’Riordan, T. (2018). Civic science and the sustainability transition. In J. C. Bridger, & A. E. Luloff (Eds.), Community and sustainable development (pp. 96-116). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315071190-6
Pateman, R., Dyke, A., & West, S. (2021). The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.369
Phillips, T., Porticella, N., Constas, M., & Bonney, R. (2018). A framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from participation in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.126
Price, C. A., & Lee, H.‑S. (2013). Changes in participants’ scientific attitudes and epistemological beliefs during an astronomical citizen science project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 773-801. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21090
Queiruga-Dios, M. Á., López-Iñesta, E., Diez-Ojeda, M., Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., & Vázquez Dorrío, J. B. (2020). Citizen science for scientific literacy and the attainment of sustainable development goals in formal education. Sustainability, 12(10), 4283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104283
Ratnieks, F. L. W., Schrell, F., Sheppard, R. C., Brown, E., Bristow, O. E., & Garbuzov, M. (2016). Data reliability in citizen science: Learning curve and the effects of training method, volunteer background and experience on identification accuracy of insects visiting ivy flowers. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(10), 1226-1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12581
Ruiz-Mallén, I., Riboli-Sasco, L., Ribrault, C., Heras, M., Laguna, D., & Perié, L. (2016). Citizen science: Toward transformative learning. Science Communication, 38(4), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016642241
Russell, S. S. (2006). An overview of adult-learning processes. Urologic Nursing, 26(5), 349-352, 370.
Salomon, M., Schmid, E., Volkens, A., Hey, C., Holm-Müller, K., & Foth, H. (2016). Towards an integrated nitrogen strategy for Germany. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.003
Sari, I., Sinaga, P., Hernani, H., & Solfarina, S. (2020). Chemistry learning via distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 5(1), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.6346
Scheifele, L. Z., & Burkett, T. (2016). The first three years of a community lab: Lessons learned and ways forward. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(1), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i1.1013
Schultz, M., Callahan, D. L., & Miltiadous, A. (2020). Development and use of kitchen chemistry home practical activities during unanticipated campus closures. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2678-2684. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00620
Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, McCallie, R. E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B. V., Krasny, M. E., & Bonney, R. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229
Silva, C., Monteiro, A. J., Manahl, C., Lostal, E., Schäfer, T., Andrade, N., Brasileiro, F., Mota, P., Sanz, F. S., Carrodeguas, J., & Brito, R. (2016). Cell spotting: Educational and motivational outcomes of cell biology citizen science project in the classroom. Journal of Science Communication, 15(01), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15010202
Smith, M. L. (2014). Citizen science in archaeology. American Antiquity, 79(4), 749-762. https://doi.org/10.7183/0002-7316.79.4.749
Thornhill, I., Chautard, A., & Loiselle, S. (2018). Monitoring biological and chemical trends in temperate still waters using citizen science. Water, 10(7), 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070839
Turrini, T., Dörler, D., Richter, A., Heigl, F., & Bonn, A. (2018). The threefold potential of environmental citizen science–Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biological Conservation, 225, 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024
van der Velde, T., Milton, D. A., Lawson, T. J., Wilcox, C., Lansdell, M., Davis, G., Perkins, G., & Hardesty, B. D. (2017). Comparison of marine debris data collected by researchers and citizen scientists: Is citizen science data worth the effort? Biological Conservation, 208, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.025
Vetenskap & Allmänhet. (2021). Svinnkollen Slutrapport–Forskarfredags Massexperiment 2020: Svinkollen final report [ForskarFredags Mass Experiment 2020: Svinkollen final report]. https://v-a.se/2021/05/svinnkollen-slutrapport-forskarfredags-massexperiment-2020/
West, S., Dyke, A., & Pateman, R. (2021). Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.370
Wiggins, A., & Wilbanks, J. (2019). The rise of citizen science in health and biomedical research. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB, 19(8), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859
Yip, J., Clegg, T., Bonsignore, E., Gelderblom, H., Lewittes, B., Guha, M. L., & Druin, A. (2012). Kitchen chemistry: Supporting learners’ decisions in science. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10^th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 103-110). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201201988

How to cite this article

APA

Lüsse, M., Brockhage, F., Beeken, M., & Pietzner, V. (2022). Citizens’ views on home experiments in the context of a chemistry citizen science project. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8), em2142. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12246

Vancouver

Lüsse M, Brockhage F, Beeken M, Pietzner V. Citizens’ views on home experiments in the context of a chemistry citizen science project. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(8):em2142. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12246

AMA

Lüsse M, Brockhage F, Beeken M, Pietzner V. Citizens’ views on home experiments in the context of a chemistry citizen science project. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(8), em2142. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12246

Chicago

Lüsse, Mientje, Frauke Brockhage, Marco Beeken, and Verena Pietzner. "Citizens’ views on home experiments in the context of a chemistry citizen science project". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 8 (2022): em2142. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12246

Harvard

Lüsse, M., Brockhage, F., Beeken, M., and Pietzner, V. (2022). Citizens’ views on home experiments in the context of a chemistry citizen science project. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8), em2142. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12246

MLA

Lüsse, Mientje et al. "Citizens’ views on home experiments in the context of a chemistry citizen science project". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 8, 2022, em2142. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12246