• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
• Blease, D. (1986). Evaluating Educational software. Croom Helm, 51 Washinton Street, Dover, New Hampshire 03820, USA.
• Collins, T. Jr. (1996). The effects of computer-assisted algebra instruction on achievement, mathematics anxiety levels and attitudes toward personal use of computers of students in an historically black University. PhD Thesis, University of South Florida.
• Fletcher, W. E. & Deeds, J. P. (1994). Computer anxiety and other factors preventing computer use among United States secondary agricultural educators. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(2), 16-21.
• Fullan, M. (1982). The new meaning of educational change. Toronto: OISE Press.
• Griffin, J. (1988). CAL Innovation as Viewed by Purchasers of Computer Software in Secondary Schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 4, No 3, pp. 150-161.
• Gressard, C. P., & Loyd, B. H. (1986). Validation studies of a new computer attitude scale. Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 18(4), 295-301.
• Heywood, G. & Norman, P. (1988). Problems of educational innovation: the primary teacher’s response to using the microcomputer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 4, No 1, pp. 34-43.
• Jay, T.B. (1981). Computerphobia: What to do about it. Educational Technology, 21, 47-48.
• Kadijevich, D. J. (2002). Four Critical Issues of Applying Educational Technology Standards to Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at the undergraduate level. University of Crete.
• Kluever, R., Lam, T., Hoffman, E., Green, K. and Swearingen, D. (1994). The Computer Attitude Scale: Assessing Changes in Teachers’ Attitudes toward Computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 11, No 3, pp. 251-61.
• Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1984a). Reliability and factorial validity of Computer Attitude Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
• Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1984b). The effects of sex, age, and computer experience on computer attitudes. AEDS Journal, 18(2), 67 77.
• Loyd, B. H. & Loyd, E. L. (1985). The Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for the Assessment of Computer Attitudes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 903 909.
• Manoucherhri, A. (1999). Computers and School Mathematics Reform: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18, 1, 31-48.
• Nash, J. B. & Moroz, P. (1997). Computer Attitudes Among Professional Educators: The Role of Gender and Experience. Annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Austin, TX, January 23-25.
• Nickerson, R. S. (1981): Why Interactive Computer Systems are Sometimes Not Used by People Who Might Benefit from Them. In International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15 (4) p. 469-483
• Pelton, L.F. & Pelton, T.W. (1998). Using WWW, Usenets, and E-mail to manage a mathematics pre-service technology course. Computers in the Schools, 14, 3-4, 79-93.
• Pope-Davis, D. B. & Twing, J. S. (1991). The Effects of the Age, Gender, and Experience on Measure of Attitude Regarding Computers. Computer in Human Behavior, 7, 333-339.
• Park, S-Y. & Gamon, J. (1995). Computer use, Experience, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Extension Personnel: Implication for Designing Educational Programs. National Agricultural. Education Research Meeting, December 1, 1995, Denver, Colorado.
• Robb, D. A. (1996). Survey of Teachers' Attitudes to Computers. http://www.egss.demon.co.uk/dr_www/drnofram/resrch/introrqs.htm#Introduction
• Selwyn, N. (1997) ‘Students’ attitudes toward computers: validation of a computer attitude scale for 16-19 education’ Computers and Education, 28, 1, pp.35-42
• Smith, M. N. & Kotrlik, J. W. (1990). Computer Anxiety Levels of Southern Region Cooperative Extension Agents. Journal of Agricultural Education, 31(1), 12-17.
• Steen, L. A. (1989). Teaching Mathematics for Tomorrow’s World. Educational Leadership, 47:1 (September),18-22.
• Yuen, A. H. K. & Ma, W. K. (2001). Teachers' Computer Attitudes: Factors influencing the Instructional Use of Computers. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, November 2001, Korea, 7p.
• Woodrow, J. E. J. (1991). A Comparison of Four Computer Attitude Scales. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7 (2), 165-187.

APA

Yushau, B. (2006). Computer Attitude, Use, Experience, Software Familiarity and Perceived Pedagogical Usefulness: The Case of Mathematics Professors. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75461

Vancouver

Yushau B. Computer Attitude, Use, Experience, Software Familiarity and Perceived Pedagogical Usefulness: The Case of Mathematics Professors. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2006;2(3):1-17. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75461

AMA

Yushau B. Computer Attitude, Use, Experience, Software Familiarity and Perceived Pedagogical Usefulness: The Case of Mathematics Professors. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2006;2(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75461

Chicago

Yushau, B.. "Computer Attitude, Use, Experience, Software Familiarity and Perceived Pedagogical Usefulness: The Case of Mathematics Professors". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2006 2 no. 3 (2006): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75461

Harvard

Yushau, B. (2006). Computer Attitude, Use, Experience, Software Familiarity and Perceived Pedagogical Usefulness: The Case of Mathematics Professors. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75461

MLA

Yushau, B. "Computer Attitude, Use, Experience, Software Familiarity and Perceived Pedagogical Usefulness: The Case of Mathematics Professors". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 2, no. 3, 2006, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75461