Developing a Four-level Learning Progression and Assessment for the Concept of Buoyancy
SeoungHey Paik 1, Geuron Song 1, Sungki Kim 1, Minsu Ha 2 *
More Detail
1 Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, Korea
2 Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
* Corresponding Author


Despite its complexity in science, sinking and floating is a phenomenon about which students of almost all grades develop personal theories, using a variety of conceptual elements such as weight, volume, shape, and density, prior to classroom teaching. Here, we distribute students from elementary to high school according to the levels of their achievement on the learning progression regarding the buoyancy phenomenon. We suggest four levels of learning progression for buoyancy concept. We developed a 13-item, open-ended, and short essay type questionnaire to evaluate students’ learning progression of buoyancy concept based on two different contexts. We evaluated the validity and reliability of the new instrument for measuring buoyancy learning progression using a series of rigorous statistical tests. Participants of this study were students in grades 3–12 (N = 1,017). A series of analyses including internal consistency analysis (Cronbach alpha), confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling, and Rasch analysis for item fit and person/item reliability revealed that the instrument met the quality benchmark. Furthermore, our findings revealed that students’ abilities in two different contexts were differentiated. Finally, we discuss the four levels of learning progression, concept assessment items developed, and some implications based on the findings.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2017 - Volume 13 Issue 8, pp. 4965-4986

Publication date: 04 Aug 2017

Article Views: 1103

Article Downloads: 392

Open Access References How to cite this article