• Bers, M., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teach designers: Integrating robotics in early childhood education information technology in childhood education. AACE, 1, 123–145.
• Bers, M.U., & Portsmore, M. (2005). Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and Enginnering students teaching Maths and Science though robotics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1).
• Eliasz, A. W. (2009). Progress in robotics, chapter 25, College Station, Texas, 214-223.
• Gura, M. (2011). Getting started with robotics: A guide for K–12 educators, chapter 1, 1-17 International Society for Technology in Education.
• Han, K. S., & Wook, J. J. (2009). Introduction for freshmen to embedded systems using Lego Mindstorms. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(1), 99–108.
• Kaloti-Hallak, F., & Armoni, M. (2015). The effectiveness of robotics competitions on students’ learning of computer science. Olympiads in Informatics, 9, 89–112.
• Lauwers, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Hamner, I. (2009). CS bots: Design and deployment of a robot designed for the CS1 Classroom. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 428–432.
• Lego Mindstorms. (2011). Home. Retrieved from http://mindstorms.lego.com.
• Miller D.P., Nourbakshs, I. R., & Siegwart, R. (2008). Robots for education. In Handbook of Robotics. Springer, 1283-1301. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• Shamlian, S. V., Killfoile, K., Kellogg, R., & Duvallet, F. (2006). Fun with robots: A student-taught undergraduate robotics course. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 369–374.
• Sprankle, M., & Hubbard, J. (2012). Problem solving and programming concepts. Boston: Prentice Hall.
• Uzunboylu, H., & Karagözlü, D. (2015). Flipped classroom: A review of recent literature. World Journal on Educational Technology, 7(2), 142–147.
• Vollstedt, A. M. (2005) Using robotics to increase student knowledge and interest in Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths. A master thesis of Science in Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno.

Vancouver

Özüorçun NÇ, Bicen H. Does the Inclusion of Robots Affect Engineering Students’ Achievement in Computer Programming Courses?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8):4779-87. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00964a

APA

Özüorçun, N. Ç., & Bicen, H. (2017). Does the Inclusion of Robots Affect Engineering Students’ Achievement in Computer Programming Courses?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4779-4787. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00964a

AMA

Özüorçun NÇ, Bicen H. Does the Inclusion of Robots Affect Engineering Students’ Achievement in Computer Programming Courses?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8), 4779-4787. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00964a

Chicago

Özüorçun, Nilcan Çiftçi, and Hüseyin Bicen. "Does the Inclusion of Robots Affect Engineering Students’ Achievement in Computer Programming Courses?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 8 (2017): 4779-4787. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00964a

Harvard

Özüorçun, N. Ç., and Bicen, H. (2017). Does the Inclusion of Robots Affect Engineering Students’ Achievement in Computer Programming Courses?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), pp. 4779-4787. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00964a

MLA

Özüorçun, Nilcan Çiftçi et al. "Does the Inclusion of Robots Affect Engineering Students’ Achievement in Computer Programming Courses?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 8, 2017, pp. 4779-4787. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00964a