Effect Size Test of Learning Model ARIAS and PBL: Concept Mastery of Temperature and Heat on Senior High School Students
Full Text (PDF)
Chairul Anwar 1 * , Antomi Saregar 1, Yuberti 1, Nova Zellia 2, Widayanti 2, Rahma Diani 1, Ismail Suardi Wekke 3
More Detail
1 State Islamic University Raden Intan Lampung, INDONESIA
2 University of Lampung, INDONESIA
3 Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Sorong, West Papua, INDONESIA
* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The study aims to find out first, whether there is a difference between the learning model of Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, and Satisfaction (ARIAS) and Problem Based Learning (PBL) on the concept mastery of temperature and heat. Second, it also aims to investigate the effectiveness of ARIAS and PBL learning model on the concept mastery of temperature and heat. The study uses Quasi-Experiment method with Nonequivalent Control Group Design, and sample selection with Cluster Random Sampling technique. This technique consists of two classes, i.e., experimental class I applying ARIAS learning model and experimental class II applying PBL model. The technique of data collection uses test instruments (pretest and posttest). The result of t test with 5% significant level indicates that t calculate = 2.03 > t table = 1.99, thus, it is concluded that (1) there is a difference using the learning model of ARIAS and PBL on concept mastery. The result of Effect Size test is a score of 0.45 with the medium category. Based on the result, it can be concluded that (2) using the learning model of ARIAS is more effective than PBL on the concept mastery of temperature and heat in high school students.

Keywords

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103032

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2019 - Volume 15 Issue 3, Article No: em1679

Publication date: 19 Jan 2019

Article Views: 3371

Article Downloads: 1171

Open Access References How to cite this article