• Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organising theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abel, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807-830). New York: Routledge.
• Bächtold, M. (2013). What do students “construct” according to constructivism in science education? Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2477-2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9369-7
• Bencze, J. L., & G. M. Bowen (2009), A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2459-2483. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802398127
• Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
• Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 291-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
• Cohen, R., & Swerdlik, M. (2010). Psychological testing and assessment. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
• Conklin, W., & Manfro (2012). Higher Order Thinking Skills to develop 21st century learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education Publishing, Inc.
• Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific practices in the science classroom. In N.G. Lederman & SK Abell, (eds). Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2). London, England: Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
• Department of Basic Education (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement: grade 10-12 Physical science. Pretoria: Government Printer.
• diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N. M., & Esterly, J. B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28, 843-900. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2806_1
• Driver, R., & Bell, B. (1985). Students’ thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. School Science Review, 67(240), 443-456.
• Falk, J., & Drayton, B. (2004). State Testing and Inquiry-Based Science: Are They Complementary or Competing Reforms? Journal of Educational Change 5, 345-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-004-1069-7
• Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp. 8-33). New York: Teachers College Press.
• Gaigher, E., Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2014) Knowledge about Inquiry: A study in South African high schools. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3125-3147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.954156
• Gomez, K. (2007). Negotiating discources: sixth-grade students’ use of multiple science discources during a science fair presentation. Linguistics and education, 18, 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.03.002
• Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning. ALT-J, 3(2), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v5i2.10558
• Hamza, K. M., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). Describing and analyzing learning in action: An empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science. Science Education, 92, 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20233
• Hewson, P. W., & Lemberger, J. (2000). Status as the hallmark of conceptual learning. In R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving Science Education: the contribution of research (pp. 110-125). Milton Keynes: Open University.
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N., (2003). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
• Hume, A. (2009). Authentic Scientific Inquiry and School Science. Teaching Science, 55(2), 35-41.
• Inter-Academy Panel (2011). Taking inquiry-based science education into secondary education. Report of a global conference.
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
• Koomen, M. H., Rodriguez, E., Hoffman, A., Petersen, C., & Oberhauser, K. (2018). Authentic science with citizen science and student‐driven science fair projects. Science Education, 102, 593-644. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21335
• Kremer, K., Specht, C., Urhahne, D., & Mayer, J. (2014). The relationship in biology between the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Biological Education, 48(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.788541
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
• Lawrence, E. (1970). The origins and growth of modern education. Baltimore, M.D.: Penguin Books.
• Le Grange, L. (2008). The history of biology as a school subject and developments in the subject in contemporary South Africa. Southern African Review of Education, 14(3), 89-105.
• Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquire within. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• McComas, W. F. (2011). Science fair. The Science Teacher, 78(8), 34-38.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
• Mupira, P., & Ramnarain, U. (2018). The effect of inquiry-based learning on the achievement goal-orientation of grade 10 physical sciences learners at township schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(6), 810-825.
• Naidoo, P., & Lewin, J. (1998). Policy and planning of physical science education in South Africa: Myths and realities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(7), 729-744. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199809)35:7<729::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Onwu, G. & Stoffels, N. (2005). Instructional functions in large, under-resourced science classes: Perspectives of South African teachers. Perspectives in Education, 23(3), 79-91
• Paul, J., Lederman, N. G., & Groß, J. (2016). Learning experimentation through science fairs, International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2367-2387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1243272
• Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.881626
• Ramnarain, U. (2014). Teachers' perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 65-75.
• Ramnarain, U., & Moosa, S. (2017). The Use of Simulations in Correcting Electricity Misconceptions of Grade 10 South African Physical Sciences Learners. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(5), 1-20.
• Rogan, J. M., & Aldous, C. (2005). Relationship between the constructs of a theory of curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20054
• Saldana, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
• Schmidt, K. M., & Kelter, P. (2017). Science Fairs: A qualitative study of their impact on student science inquiry learning and attitudes toward STEM. Science Educator, 25(2), 126-132.
• Sund, R. B., & Trowbridge, L. W. (1973). Teaching science by inquiry in the secondary School. Ohio: Merrill.
• Syer, C. A., & Shore, B. M. (2001). Science fairs: What are the sources of help for students and how prevalent is cheating? School Science and Mathematics, 101(4), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18023.x
• Tindangen, M. (2018). Inquiry-based learning model to improve higher order thinking skills. Asian Social Science, 14(7), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n7p39
• Travers, P., & Rebore, R. (1987). Foundations of education: Becoming a teacher. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
• Wang, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse’s mouth: What scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93(1), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20290
• White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all learners. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2

Vancouver

Ramnarain UD. Exploring the Autonomy of South African School Science Students when Doing Investigative Inquiries for a Science Fair. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12):em1911. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9128

APA

Ramnarain, U. D. (2020). Exploring the Autonomy of South African School Science Students when Doing Investigative Inquiries for a Science Fair. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1911. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9128

AMA

Ramnarain UD. Exploring the Autonomy of South African School Science Students when Doing Investigative Inquiries for a Science Fair. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12), em1911. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9128

Chicago

Ramnarain, Umesh Dewnarain. "Exploring the Autonomy of South African School Science Students when Doing Investigative Inquiries for a Science Fair". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 12 (2020): em1911. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9128

Harvard

Ramnarain, U. D. (2020). Exploring the Autonomy of South African School Science Students when Doing Investigative Inquiries for a Science Fair. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1911. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9128

MLA

Ramnarain, Umesh Dewnarain "Exploring the Autonomy of South African School Science Students when Doing Investigative Inquiries for a Science Fair". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 12, 2020, em1911. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9128