Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
• Anning, A. S. (2024). Investigating STEM teachers’ personal and sociocultural particularities in the Ghanaian context. International Journal of Educational Research, 125, Article 102341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102341
• Ballout, H. I. (2009). Career commitment and career success: Moderating role of self‐efficacy. Career Development International, 14(7), 655-670. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430911005708
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman & Company.
• Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
• Bennell, P. (2004). Teacher motivation and incentives in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Brighton: Knowledge and Skills for Development. https://doi.org/10.1.1.539.5931&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Berisha, F., & Vula, E. (2023). Introduction of integrated STEM education to pre-service teachers through collaborative action research practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10417-3
• Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 533-546. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391809
• Burke, P. J. (2003). Relationships among multiple identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 195-214). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9188-1_14
• Canrinus, E. T., Helms-Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Hofman, A. (2011). Self-efficacy, job satisfaction, motivation and commitment: Exploring the relationships between indicators of teachers’ professional identity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(1), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0069-2
• Chen, Y. C., Wu, H. -K., & Hsin, C.-T. (2022). Science teaching in kindergartens: Factors associated with teachers’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations for integrating science into teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 44(7), 1044-1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2062800
• Chesnut, S. R., & Burley, H. (2015). Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 15(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001
• DeCoito, I., & Myszkal, P. (2018). Connecting science instruction and teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs in STEM education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 485-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2018.1473748
• El Nagdi, M., Leammukda, F., & Roehrig, G. (2018). Developing identities of STEM teachers at emerging STEM schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(36), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0136-1
• English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
• Ferguson, S. L., Moore, E. W. G., & Hull, D. M. (2019). Finding latent groups in observed data: A primer on latent profile analysis in Mplus for applied researchers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(5), 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419881721
• Firestone, W. A., & Rosenblum, S. (1988). Building commitment in urban high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(4), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737010004285
• Galanti, T. M., & Holincheck, N. (2022). Beyond content and curriculum in elementary classrooms: Conceptualizing the cultivation of integrated STEM teacher identity. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(43), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00358-8
• Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
• Hamilton, M., O’ Dwyer, A., Leavy, A., Hourigan, M., Carroll, C., & Corry, E. (2021). A case study exploring primary teachers’ experiences of a STEM education school-university partnership. Teachers and Teaching, 27(1-4), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1920906
• Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(11), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
• Kewalramani, S., Adams, M., & Cooper, R. (2022). STEM professional learning: Supports and tensions with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian teachers’ immersion experiences in Australian schools. Teachers and Teaching, 28(4), 398-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2062736
• Lin, K. -Y. (2018). Reflection on the current situation of STEM education in Taiwan. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(1), 1-9.
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767-778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
• Magnusson, D. (2003). The person approach: Concepts, measurement models, and research strategy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2003(101), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.79
• Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Australian Council of Learned Academies.
• Martín‐Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales‐Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez‐González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
• McCaw, C. T. (2023). Beyond deliberation-radical reflexivity, contemplative practices and teacher change. Journal of Educational Change, 24(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09432-4
• Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
• Ministry of Education. (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: Natural sciences. Author.
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
• O’Dwyer, A., Hourigan, M., Leavy, A. M., & Corry, E. (2023). 'I have seen STEM in action and it's quite do-able!' The impact of an extended professional development model on teacher efficacy in primary STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(S1), 131-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10361-2
• Oberski, D. (2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In J. Robertson & M. Kaptein (Eds.), Modern statistical methods for HCI (pp. 275-287). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_12
• Polizzi, S. J., Zhu, Y., Reid, J. W., Ofem, B., Salisbury, S., Beeth, M., Roehrig, G., Mohr-Schroeder, M., Sheppard, K., & Rushton, G. T. (2021). Science and mathematics teacher communities of practice: Social influences on discipline-based identity and self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(30), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00275-2
• Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Baumert, J., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Glock, S., & Böhmer, M. (2014). Teachers’ professional development: Assessment, training, and learning. In S. Krolak-Schwerdt, S. Glock, & M. Böhmer (Eds.), Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities (pp. 97-121). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-536-6
• Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740605
• Rodriguez, J. A., Condom-Bosch, J. L., Ruiz, L., & Oliver, E. (2020). On the shoulders of giants: Benefits of participating in a dialogic professional development program for in-service teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00005
• Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. Longman.
• Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
• Schmidt, M., Blomeke, S., Tatto, M. T., Hsieh, F. -J., Cogan, L. S., Houang, R., Bankov, K., Santillan, M., Cedillo, T., Han, S. -I., Carnoy, M., Paine, L., & Schwille, J. (2011). Teacher education matters: A study of middle school mathematics teacher preparation in six countries. Teacher College Press.
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
• Shahali, E. H. M., & Halim, L. (2024). The influence of science teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, self-efficacy and school context on integrated STEM teaching practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10403-9
• Smith, K. N. (2022). ‘If I do science, I can get the money’: A life history analysis of postsecondary students’ decisions to pursue teaching careers in STEM. Teachers and Teaching, 28(1), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.2023862
• Snowman, J., McCown, R., & Biehler, R. F. (2012). Psychology applied to teaching (13th ed.). Wadsworth.
• So, W. M. W., He, Q., Chen, Y., & Chow, C. F. (2020). school-STEM professionals’ collaboration: A case study on teachers’ conceptions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(3), 300-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866x.2020.1774743
• Sokha, K. (2024). Examine the impact of contextual, personal, and behavioral factors on high school teachers’ engagement in teaching science using an integrated STEM approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10447-5
• Sterba, S. K. (2013). Understanding linkages among mixture models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(6), 775-815. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.827564
• Stronach, I., Corbin, B., McNamara, O., Stark, S., & Warne, T. (2002). Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: Teacher and nurse identities in flux. Journal of Education Policy, 17(1), 109-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110100081
• Taber, K. S. (2014). Ethical considerations of chemistry education research involving ‘human subjects’. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(2), 109-113. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp90003k
• Tein, J. -Y., Coxe, S., & Cham, H. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 640-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824781
• Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). How school context and personal factors relate to teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(3), 631-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9416-1
• Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2019). Teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM: The impact of personal background characteristics and school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), 987-1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9898-7
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
• Vermunt, J., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analyses. In J. Hagenaars, & A. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89-106). Cambridge University Press.
• Wang, H. -H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636
• Ware, H., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Teacher and collective efficacy beliefs as predictors of professional commitment. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 303-310. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.5.303-310
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practices: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
• Yang, K. -L., & Ball, L. (2024). STEM teacher education programs for preservice and in-service secondary mathematics teachers: A review study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27, 18-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09557-0
• Yang, K. -L., Wu, H. -K., Yeh, Y. -F., Lin, K. -Y., Wu, J. -Y., & Hsu, Y. -S. (2023). Implementers, designers, and disseminators of integrated STEM activities: Self-efficacy and commitment. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(4), 1433-1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.2008343
• Yoon, I., & Kim, M. (2022). Dynamic patterns of teachers’ professional development participation and their relations with socio-demographic characteristics, teacher self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, Article 103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103565
• Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801

APA

Yang, K.-L., Wu, H.-K., Wu, J.-Y., Lin, K.-Y., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2025). Identity and experience matter: Differences between secondary STEM teachers’ self-efficacy and commitment in integrated STEM teaching activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(4), em2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16082

Vancouver

Yang KL, Wu HK, Wu JY, Lin KY, Hsu YS. Identity and experience matter: Differences between secondary STEM teachers’ self-efficacy and commitment in integrated STEM teaching activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(4):em2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16082

AMA

Yang KL, Wu HK, Wu JY, Lin KY, Hsu YS. Identity and experience matter: Differences between secondary STEM teachers’ self-efficacy and commitment in integrated STEM teaching activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(4), em2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16082

Chicago

Yang, Kai-Lin, Hsin-Kai Wu, Jen-Yi Wu, Kuen-Yi Lin, and Ying-Shao Hsu. "Identity and experience matter: Differences between secondary STEM teachers’ self-efficacy and commitment in integrated STEM teaching activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 4 (2025): em2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16082

Harvard

Yang, K.-L., Wu, H.-K., Wu, J.-Y., Lin, K.-Y., and Hsu, Y.-S. (2025). Identity and experience matter: Differences between secondary STEM teachers’ self-efficacy and commitment in integrated STEM teaching activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(4), em2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16082

MLA

Yang, Kai-Lin et al. "Identity and experience matter: Differences between secondary STEM teachers’ self-efficacy and commitment in integrated STEM teaching activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 4, 2025, em2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16082