Integrating Technology Into Instruction At A Public University In Kyrgyzstan: Barriers And Enablers

Gulshat Muhametjanova; Kursat Cagiltay

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1287a

Full Text (PDF)

Gulshat Muhametjanova ¹ ^* , Kursat Cagiltay ²

More Detail

¹ Kyrgyz Turkish Manas University² Middle East Technical University^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background:
The purpose of this study was to determine enablers and barriers to the technology integration into education based on the example of the situation at the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University as reported by students and instructors.

Material and methods:
The study employed the mixed-methods research design, combining data obtained from 477 student and 57 instructor questionnaires supplemented by interviews with 11 students and 9 instructors.

Results:
The study revealed that although technology is being used at the universities all over the country, there still exists the lack of both hardware and software laboratories and the instructors have limited knowledge and experience with technology, which, in its turn, indicates the shortage of qualified technical personnel. The cost of personal computers and problems with the Internet connection were claimed to be the major barriers for students.

Conclusions:
The results of this study can be used by the Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, the Ministry of Education, and by other related institutions in Kyrgyzstan. Furthermore, the results can contribute to the existing literature on the use of ICT in the country.

Keywords

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
technology integration
barriers
enablers
Kyrgyzstan

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2016, Volume 12, Issue 10, 2657-2670

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1287a

Publication date: 25 Jul 2016

Article Views: 2076

Article Downloads: 1132

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Akin, M. S. (2013). Computer and internet usage in higher education in developing countries:case for Kyrgyz university students. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 12(1), 41- 48.
Al Senaidi, S. (2009). An investigation of factors affecting Omani faculty members' adoption of information and computing technology (Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Texas).
Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers and Education 47 (4), 373–398.
Al Gamdi, M. A., & Samarji, A. (2016). Perceived Barriers towards e-Learning by Faculty Members at a Recently Established University in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(1), 23.
Asian Development Bank Annual Report (2012), retrieved on November 20, 2013 from http://www.adb.org/documents/adb-annual-report-2012
Beggs, T. A. (2000). Influences and barriers to the adoption of instructional technology. ERIC.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245.
Brill, J., & Galloway, C. (2007). Perils and promises: University instructors’ integration of technology in classroom-based practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (1), 95-105.
Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology. Educause Quarterly, 2, 22-28.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research.
Cuban, L. (2009). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
Dawes, L. (2001). What stops teachers using new technologies? In M. leask (Ed.), Issues in teaching using ICT, 61-79.
Diehl, D. E.(2005). A study of faculty-related variables and competence in integrating instructional technologies into pedagogical practices (Doctoral Dissertation, Texas Southern University).
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and secondorder barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47– 61.
Gesci (2009) Building a Knowledge Society for All, retrieved on December 2013 from http://www.gesci.org/assets/files/Strategic%20Plan%2009%20-11.pdf
Goktas, Y. (2006). The current status of information and communication technologies integration into schools of teacher education and K-12 in Turkey (Doctoral dissertation, MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY).
Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main Barriers and Possible Enablers of ICTs Integration into Pre-service Teacher Education Programs. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (1), 193–204.
Gupte, M. (2015). DOES INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY HAVE AN IMPORTANT ROLE TO PLAY IN INDIAN HIGHER EDUCATION?. Abhinav-International Monthly Refereed Journal Of Research In Management & Technology (Online ISSN 2320- 0073), 4(1), 41-46.
Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 197–217. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2015/helm.pdf
Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37-52.
Hossain, M. A., Salam, M. A., Shilpi, F., & Officer, A. D. (2016). Readıness and Challenges of Usıng Informatıon and Communıcatıons Technology (Ict) in Hıgher Educatıon of Bangladesh. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 6(1), 122.
Ihmeideh, F. M. (2009). Barriers to the Use of Technology in Jordanian Pre-School Settings. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 325-341.
Keengwe, J., G. Onchwari, et al. (2008). Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promise. Journal of Science Education andTechnology 17(6), 560- 565.
Larson, L. L. (2003). A descriptive study of technology integration and faculty professional development in one higher education institution (Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University).
Lee, K. (2000). English teachers' barriers to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal 6 (12), Retrieved on December 11, 2013, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html.
Manas University Gelişmeler Raporu (2013), retrieved on November 2013, from www.manas.edu.tr.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Investigating perceived barriers to the use of open educational resources in higher education in Tanzania. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2).
Muhametjanova, G., & Çagiltay, K. (2012, July). Students' and Instructors' Perceptions on Use of Information and Communication Technologies during Instruction in a Kyrgyzstan University. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on (pp. 500-502). IEEE.
Nawaz, A., & Kundi, G. M. (2010). Demographic implications for the user-perceptions of elearning in higher education institutions of NW. FP, PAKISTAN. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 41.
Newhouse, P. (1999). Examining how teachers adjust to the availability of portable computers. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15, 148-166.
Nicolle, P. S. (2005). Technology adoption into teaching and learning by mainstream university faculty: A mixed methodology study revealing the “how, when, why, and why not.” (Doctoral Dissertation, Louisiana State University).
OECD and World Bank (2010). Education reform in a Kyrgyz Republic, Lessons Learned from PISA – Kyrgyz Republic.
Perraton, H. (2004). Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan; ICT use in education. Meta-survey on effective use of ICT.
Porter, W. W., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Schrum, L. (1999). Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 83-90.
Ssekakubo, G., Suleman, H., & Marsden, G. (2011, October). Issues of adoption: have elearning management systems fulfilled their potential in developing countries?. In Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Leadership in a Diverse, Multidisciplinary Environment (pp. 231-238). ACM.
Shaikh, Z. A., & Khoja, S. A. (2011). Role of ICT in Shaping the Future of Pakistani Higher Education System. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(1), 149- 161.
Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., & Muumbo, A. (2015). Challenges of implementing e-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1).
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research.,(SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA).
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (Eds.). (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications Inc.
Tempus report (2012), Higher Education in Kyrgyzstan, retrieved on October 2013 from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus/participating_countries/overview/Kyrgyzstan.pdf
Touray, A., Salminen, A., & Mursu, A. (2013). ICT barriers and critical success factors in developing countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 56.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2002). Towards a Knowledge-based Economy. Kyrgyzstan. Country Readiness Assessment Report.
Vajargah, K. F., Jahani, S. Azadmanesh, N. (2010). Application of ICT in teaching and learning at university level: The case of Shahid Beheshti university, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9 (2),33-39 .
Willis J., Thompson A., Sadera W., (1999). Research on Technology and Teacher Education: Current Status and Future Directions, Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(4), 29-45.

How to cite this article

APA

Muhametjanova, G., & Cagiltay, K. (2016). Integrating Technology Into Instruction At A Public University In Kyrgyzstan: Barriers And Enablers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(10), 2657-2670. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1287a

Vancouver

Muhametjanova G, Cagiltay K. Integrating Technology Into Instruction At A Public University In Kyrgyzstan: Barriers And Enablers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(10):2657-70. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1287a

AMA

Muhametjanova G, Cagiltay K. Integrating Technology Into Instruction At A Public University In Kyrgyzstan: Barriers And Enablers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(10), 2657-2670. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1287a

Chicago

Muhametjanova, Gulshat, and Kursat Cagiltay. "Integrating Technology Into Instruction At A Public University In Kyrgyzstan: Barriers And Enablers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 10 (2016): 2657-2670. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1287a

Harvard

Muhametjanova, G., and Cagiltay, K. (2016). Integrating Technology Into Instruction At A Public University In Kyrgyzstan: Barriers And Enablers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(10), pp. 2657-2670. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1287a

MLA

Muhametjanova, Gulshat et al. "Integrating Technology Into Instruction At A Public University In Kyrgyzstan: Barriers And Enablers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 10, 2016, pp. 2657-2670. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1287a