Investigating the relationship between students' interest in physics and environmental attitudes in Georgia

Marika Kapanadze; Nino Javakhishvili; Lia Dzagania

doi:10.29333/ejmste/13429

Full Text (PDF)

Marika Kapanadze ¹ ^* , Nino Javakhishvili ¹ , Lia Dzagania ¹

More Detail

¹ Ilia State University, Tbilisi, GEORGIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper presents some aspects of the relevance of physics education from a Georgian perspective. Students’ interest in physics is currently an important issue for effective learning and teaching in many countries. We report about the results of an extensive physics students’ survey at the end of compulsory education and the beginning of upper secondary school in Georgia. Students’ interest in physics was investigated in different contexts regarding ‘out of school’ experiences, attitudes toward environmental issues, and science and technology. Girls conveyed a higher interest in physics than boys. Some correlations are found between students’ interest in physics and respect for environmental issues, nature, and science discoveries. The study suggests some recommendations for the development of physics curricula, textbooks and teacher education programs in the country.

Keywords

students’ interest
physics education
physics curriculum

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2023, Volume 19, Issue 8, Article No: em2308

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13429

Publication date: 01 Aug 2023

Online publication date: 21 Jun 2023

Article Views: 766

Article Downloads: 591

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Agyei, E. D., & Agyei, D. D. (2021). Enhancing students’ learning of physics concepts with simulation as an instructional ICT tool. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(2), e02111. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/11259
Belova, N., Dittmar, J., Hansson, L., Hofstein, A., Nielsen, J. A., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2017). Cross-curricular goals and raising the relevance of science education. In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research (pp. 297-307). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_22
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Dega, B. G., Kriek, J., & Mogese, T. F. (2013). Students’ conceptual change in electricity and magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6), 677-698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21096
Gani, A., Syukri, M., Khairunnisak, K., Nazar, M., & Sari, R. P. (2020). Improving concept understanding and motivation of learners through PhET simulation word. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(4), 042013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042013
Gardner, P. (1998). The development of males’ and females’ interests in science and technology. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2^nd Conference on Interest and Gender (pp. 41-57).
Grolnick, W. S., Farkas, M. S., Sohmer, R., Michaels, S., & Valsiner, J. (2007). Facilitating motivation in young adolescents: Effects of an after-school program. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 332-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.04.004
Häussler, P., Hoffman, L., Langeheine, R., Rost, J., & Sievers, K. (1998). A typology of students’ interest in physics and the distribution of gender and age within each type. International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200207
Hoffman, L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X
Hong, H.-Y., & Lin-Siegler, X. (2012). How learning about scientists’ struggles influences students’ interest and learning in physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026224
Jufrida, J., Kurniawan, W., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., & Maya, W. A. (2019). Students’ attitude and motivation in mathematical physics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 401-408. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.20253
Kapanadze, M. (2019). Implementation of the Chain Reaction Project in Georgia. In Comparative perspectives on inquiry-based science education (pp. 70-81). IGI Global.
Kapanadze, M., Janashia, S., & Eilks, I. (2010). From science education in the soviet time, via national reform initiatives, towards an international network to support inquiry-based science education – The case of Georgia and the project SALiS. In I. Eilks & B. Ralle (Eds.), Contemporary science education (pp. 237-242). Shaker.
Lavonen, J., Byman, R., Juuti, K., Meisalo, V., & Uitto, A. (2005). Pupil interest in physics: A survey in Finland. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 1(2), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.486
Mahzum, E., Farhan, A., & Ramadhani, E. (2020). The use of social media Instagram as instructional media for physics toward student’s learning motivation. Asian Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.24815/ajse.v2i1.14997
Nadiradze, L., Kapanadze, M., & Kvirkvelia, B. (2020). Use of technologies, as the effective instrument for enhancing of motivation in the process of physics teaching. In INTED2020 Proceedings, 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 2768-2773), https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.0828
NAEC. (2017). PISA 2015 results (Georgia). National Assessment and Examinations Center, Tbilisi. https://naec.news/
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
Oon, P.-T., & Subramaniam, R. (2011). On the declining interest in physics among students–From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 727-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.500338
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education 25, 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Page, K. (2015). Using social media in a high school physics classroom. The Physics Teacher, 53(3), 184-185. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4908094
Perkins, K. K., Gratny, M. M., Adams, W. K., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). Towards characterizing the relationship between students’ interest in and their beliefs about physics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 818(1), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2177042
Prima, E., Putri, A. R., & Rustaman, N. (2018). Learning solar system using PhET simulation to improve students’ understanding and motivation. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v1i2.10239
Rohim, A. M., & Ellianawati, E. (2020). Improved understanding of student’s learning concept and motivation in inclined plane material by PhET simulation. Physics Communication, 4(2), 1-4.
Simpson, R., & Oliver, J. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740102
Simpson, R., Koballa Jr, T., Oliver, J., & Crawley III, F. (1994). Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 211-234). Macmillan.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project. An overview and key findings. http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf
Slovinsky, E., Kapanadze, M., & Bolte, C. (2021). The effect of a socio-scientific context-based science teaching program on motivational aspects of the learning environment. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1992. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11070
Sotáková, I., Ganajová, M., & Babincakova, M. (2020). Inquiry-based science education as a revision strategy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.499
Sparkes, R. A. (1995). No problem here! The supply of physics teachers in Scotland. The Curriculum Journal, 6, 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517950060107
Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
Susilawati, A., Yusrizal, Y., Halim, A., Syukri, M., Khaldun, I., & Susanna, S. (2022). The effect of using physics education technology (PhET) simulation media to enhance students’ motivation and problem-solving skills in learning physics. Journal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA [Science Education Research Journal], 8(3), 1157-1167. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1571
Trumper, R. (2006). Factors affecting junior high school students’ interest in physics. Journal of science Education and Technology, 15(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-0355-6
World Bank. (2006). Georgia-Education system realignment and strengthening program. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/
Yildirim, H. I. (2020). The effect of using out-of-school learning environments in science teaching on motivation for learning science. Participatory Educational Research, 7(1), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.9.7.1
Zhang, W., & Tang, J. (2021). Teachers’ TPACK development: A review of literature. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(7), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.97027

How to cite this article

APA

Kapanadze, M., Javakhishvili, N., & Dzagania, L. (2023). Investigating the relationship between students' interest in physics and environmental attitudes in Georgia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2308. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13429

Vancouver

Kapanadze M, Javakhishvili N, Dzagania L. Investigating the relationship between students' interest in physics and environmental attitudes in Georgia. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(8):em2308. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13429

AMA

Kapanadze M, Javakhishvili N, Dzagania L. Investigating the relationship between students' interest in physics and environmental attitudes in Georgia. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(8), em2308. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13429

Chicago

Kapanadze, Marika, Nino Javakhishvili, and Lia Dzagania. "Investigating the relationship between students' interest in physics and environmental attitudes in Georgia". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 8 (2023): em2308. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13429

Harvard

Kapanadze, M., Javakhishvili, N., and Dzagania, L. (2023). Investigating the relationship between students' interest in physics and environmental attitudes in Georgia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2308. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13429

MLA

Kapanadze, Marika et al. "Investigating the relationship between students' interest in physics and environmental attitudes in Georgia". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 8, 2023, em2308. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13429