Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alonzo, A. C., & Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Learning progressions in science: Current challenges and future directions. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
• Benjamin, T. E., Marks, B., Demetrikopoulos, M. K., Rose, J., Pollard, E., Thomas, A., & Muldrow, L. L. (2017). Development and validation of scientific literacy scale for college preparedness in STEM with freshmen from diverse institutions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 607-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9710-x
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814698
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann.
• Chang, T.-C., Lyu, Y.-M., Wu, H.-C., & Min, K.-W. (2024). Introduction of Taiwanese literacy-oriented science curriculum and development of an aligned scientific literacy assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(1), Article em2380. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13930
• Coppi, M., Fialho, I., & Cid, M. (2023). Developing a scientific literacy assessment instrument for Portuguese 3^rd cycle students. Education Sciences, 13(9), Article 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090941
• Çelik, M., & Doğru, M. (2024). Development of an attitude scale towards science literacy for secondary school pupils. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(2), 304-323. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.017
• De Moraes, J. V., & Rodrigues, P. B. (2021). Scientific literacy in geography: The use of indicators for the assessment of learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79847-5_12
• Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4), 549-580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115
• Holincheck, N., Galanti, T. M., & Trefil, J. (2022). Assessing the development of digital scientific literacy with a computational evidence-based reasoning tool. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(7), 1796-1817. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221081484
• Howell, E. L., & Brossard, D. (2021). (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world. PNAS, 118(15), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117
• Istyadji, M., & Sauqina. (2023). Conception of scientific literacy in the development of scientific literacy assessment tools: A systematic theoretical review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(2), 281-308. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.016
• Ketelhut, D. J., Nelson, B. C., Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2023). Inq-ITS: Creating rigorous assessment and real-time support of science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(3), 36-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589647
• Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
• Liu, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Luo, T., Lin, S., Li, J., & Xu, S. (2024). Development and validation of an instrument for measuring civic scientific literacy. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00092-3
• Mardhiyyah, L. A., Rusilowati, A., & Linuwih, S. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen literasi sains tema energi [Development of scientific literacy assessment instruments on the theme of energy]. Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 147-154. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/12905/7042
• Mede, N. G., Howell, E. L., Schäfer, M. S., Metag, J., Beets, B., & Brossard, D. (2026). Measuring science literacy in a digital world: Development and validation of a multi-dimensional survey scale. Science Communication, 48(1), 93-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470251317379
• Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 203-223. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
• Naganuma, S. (2017). An assessment of civic scientific literacy in Japan: Development of a more authentic assessment task and scoring rubric. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 7(4), 301-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1323131
• OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
• Ortega-Quevedo, V., & Gil Puente, C. (2020). La evaluación formativa como elemento para visibilizar el desarrollo de competencias en ciencia y tecnología y pensamiento crítico [Formative assessment as a tool to highlight the development of skills in science and technology and critical thinking]. PUBLICACIONES, 50(1), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v50i1.15977
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
• Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., & Kinslow, A. T. (2017). Assessment of scientific literacy: Development and validation of the quantitative assessment of socio-scientific reasoning (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21368
• Rusilowati, A., Kurniawati, L., Nugroho, S. E., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2016). Developing an instrument of scientific literacy assessment on the cycle theme. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5718-5727. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1115684
• Shute, V. J., & Ventura, M. (2013). Stealth assessment: Measuring and supporting learning in video games. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9589.001.0001
• Suwono, H., Maulidia, L., Saefi, M., Kusairi, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2022). The development and validation of an instrument of prospective science teachers’ perceptions of scientific literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), Article em2068. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11505
• Wenning, C. J. (2006). Assessing nature-of-science literacy as one component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 3(4), 3-10.
• Wiggins, G. (1999). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Choice Reviews Online, 36(5). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-2887
• Zhang, L., Liu, X., & Feng, H. (2023). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing scientific literacy from junior to senior high school. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00093-2

APA

Nahadi, Huda, R. S., Rahmawati, T., Lestari, T., Nugraha, E., Mumtaz, S. R., & Apriani, D. D. (2026). Mapping of scientific literacy instruments as a foundation for developing a transformative chemistry learning evaluation course model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(10), em2939. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19477

Vancouver

Nahadi, Huda RS, Rahmawati T, Lestari T, Nugraha E, Mumtaz SR, et al. Mapping of scientific literacy instruments as a foundation for developing a transformative chemistry learning evaluation course model. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(10):em2939. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19477

AMA

Nahadi, Huda RS, Rahmawati T, et al. Mapping of scientific literacy instruments as a foundation for developing a transformative chemistry learning evaluation course model. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(10), em2939. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19477

Chicago

Nahadi, Rika Sofiyatul Huda, Triannisa Rahmawati, Tri Lestari, Eki Nugraha, Salsabila Raniyah Mumtaz, and Dini Dwi Apriani. "Mapping of scientific literacy instruments as a foundation for developing a transformative chemistry learning evaluation course model". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 10 (2026): em2939. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19477

Harvard

Nahadi, Huda, R. S., Rahmawati, T., Lestari, T., Nugraha, E., Mumtaz, S. R., and Apriani, D. D. (2026). Mapping of scientific literacy instruments as a foundation for developing a transformative chemistry learning evaluation course model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(10), em2939. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19477

MLA

Nahadi et al. "Mapping of scientific literacy instruments as a foundation for developing a transformative chemistry learning evaluation course model". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 10, 2026, em2939. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19477