• Anderson, J. M. (2005). Mathematics for quantum chemistry. USA: Dover Publications.
• Bao, L. (1999). Dynamics of student modeling: A theory, algorithms and application to quantum mechanics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Maryland.
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay Company.
• Busch, P., Lahti, P. J., & Mittelstaedt, P. (1996). The quantum theory of measurement. Berlin: Springer.
• Çataloğlu, E. (2002). Development and validation of an achievement test in introductory quantum mechanics: The quantum mechanics visualization instrument (QMVI). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
• d’Espagnat, B. (2003). Veiled reality. USA: Westview Press.
• Didiş, N., & Eryılmaz, A. (2007, November). Investigation of pre-service physics teachers' motivation towards learning quantum mechanics. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference on Physics Education, Marrakech- Morocco.
• Didiş, N., & Özcan, Ö. (2007, November). Pre-service physics teachers' attributions about successing quantum mechanics Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference on Physics Education, MarrakechMorocco.
• Didiş, N., & Redish, E. F. (2010, July), How do the students perceive the reasons for their success in a modern physics course? Poster presented at the Physics Education Research Conference (PERC 2010), Portland-OR, USA.
• Dirac, P. A. M. (1958). The principles of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Dobson, K., Lawrence, I., & Britton, P. (2000). The A to B of quantum physics. Physics Education, 35(6), 400-405.
• Erkoç, Ş. (2006). Fundamentals of quantum mechanics. New York: Taylor & Francis.
• Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. CA: Sage Publications.
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P. & Borg, Q.R. (2007). Educational research. Boston: Pearson.
• Gronlund, N. E. (1971). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: McMillan Company.
• Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: McMillan Company.
• Hadzidaki, P., Kalkanis, G., & Stavrou, D. (2000). Quantum mechanics: a systemic component of the modern physics paradigm. Physics Education, 35(6), 386-392.
• Halloun, I. A. (1998). Schematic concepts for schematic models of real world: The Newtonian concept of force. Science Education, 82, 239-263.
• Hameka, H. F. (2004). Quantum mechanics: A conceptual approach. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
• Harre, R. (1966). The formal analysis of concepts. In H. J. Klausmeier & C. W. Harris (Eds.), Analysis of concept learning (pp. 3-17). New York: Academic Press.
• Ke, J. L., Monk, M., & Duschl, R. (2005). Learning introductory quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1571-1594.
• Klausmeier, H. J., Ghatala, E. S., & Frayer, D. A. (1974). Conceptual learning and development: A cognitive view. New York: Academic press.
• LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 31-60.
• Liboff, R. L. (1998). Introductory quantum mechanics. San Francisco: Addison-Wesley.
• Lising, L., & Elby, A. (2005). The impact of epistemology on learning: A case study from introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 73(4), 372-382.
• Merzbacher, E. (1998). Quantum mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Michelini, M., Ragazzon, R., Santi, L., & Stefanel, A. (2000). Proposal for quantum physics in secondary school. Physics Education, 35(6), 406-410.
• Morgan, J. T. (2006). Investigating how students think about and learn quantum physics: an example from tunnelling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Maine, Maine.
• Müller, R., & Wiesner, H. (1999, March). Students’ conceptions of quantum physics. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston- MA.
• Müller, R., & Wiesner, H. (2002). Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 200-209.
• Ortaöğretim 11. Sınıf Fizik Dersi Öğretim Programı [High school physics curriculum for 11th grades] (2008). 11. Sınıf fizik dersi öğretim programının ünite organizasyonu, [OnLine]. Available: http://www.fizikprogrami.com
• Ortaöğretim 12. Sınıf Fizik Dersi Öğretim Programı [High school physics curriculum for 12th grade] (2009). 12. Sınıf fizik dersi öğretim programını ünite organizasyonu, [OnLine]. Available: http://www.fizikprogrami.com
• Özcan, Ö., Didiş, N., & Taşar, M. F. (2009). Students’ conceptual difficulties in quantum mechanics: Potential well problems. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 36, 169-180.
• Sadaghiani, H. R. (2005). Conceptual and mathematical barriers to students learning quantum mechanics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Ohio.
• Singh, C. (2001). Student understanding of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 69(8), 885-895.
• Singh, C., Belloni, M., & Christian, W. (2006). Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics. Physics Today, 59(8), 43-49.
• Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
• Styer, D. F. (1996). Common misconceptions regarding quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 64(1), 31-34.
• Şen, A. İ. (2000). Zum stand der fachdidaktischen diskussion über die quantenphysik in deutschland. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 122-127.
• Wattanakasiwich, P. (2005). Model of understanding of probability in modern physics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Oregon.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods]. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
• Zollman, D. A., Rebello, N. S., & Hogg, K. (2002). Quantum mechanics for everyone: Hands-on activities integrated with technology. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 252- 259.

APA

Didiş, N., Eryılmaz, A., & Erkoç, Ş. (2010). Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Comprehension of Quantum Mechanical Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(4), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75243

Vancouver

Didiş N, Eryılmaz A, Erkoç Ş. Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Comprehension of Quantum Mechanical Concepts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(4):227-35. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75243

AMA

Didiş N, Eryılmaz A, Erkoç Ş. Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Comprehension of Quantum Mechanical Concepts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(4), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75243

Chicago

Didiş, Nilüfer, Ali Eryılmaz, and Şakir Erkoç. "Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Comprehension of Quantum Mechanical Concepts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2010 6 no. 4 (2010): 227-235. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75243

Harvard

Didiş, N., Eryılmaz, A., and Erkoç, Ş. (2010). Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Comprehension of Quantum Mechanical Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(4), pp. 227-235. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75243

MLA

Didiş, Nilüfer et al. "Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Comprehension of Quantum Mechanical Concepts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 6, no. 4, 2010, pp. 227-235. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75243