Pre-Service Teacher Experiences of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

Serife Turan

doi:10.29333/ejmste/11102

Full Text (PDF)

Serife Turan ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted to identify the factors that influence how pre-service science/math teachers implement the 5E instructional model and the challenges and barriers they face in doing so. Sixteen studies were identified in various electronic databases, and a meta-ethnography method was used to review the qualitative studies. The findings illustrate that the experiences of the pre-service teacher varied. Time, resources, method courses, training, field experience, beliefs, content knowledge, and classroom size were identified as influences on the practice of pre-service teachers. To sum up, this review provides a better understanding of pre-service teacher experiences in implementing the 5E instructional model.

Keywords

science/math
pre-service teacher
5E instructional model
meta-ethnography
qualitative studies

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Literature Review

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2021, Volume 17, Issue 8, Article No: em1994

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11102

Publication date: 19 Jul 2021

Article Views: 2561

Article Downloads: 2566

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Acilis, S., Yalçın, S. A., & Turgut, Ü. (2011). Effects of the 5E learning model on students’ academic achievements in movement and force issues. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2459-2462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.128
Althauser, K. L. (2018). The emphasis of inquiry instructional strategies: Impact on preservice teachers’ mathematics efficacy. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 53-70. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n1p53
Ates, O., Unal Coban, G., & Kaya Sengoren, S. (2018). Consistency between constructivist profiles and instructional practices of prospective physics teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.359
Atkins, S., Lewin, S., Smith, H., Engel, M., Fretheim, A., & Volmink, J. (2008). Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-21
Bahng, E., & Lee, M. (2017). Learning experiences and practices of elementary teacher candidates on the use of emerging technology: A grounded theory approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(2), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017236118
Bang, E. (2013). Exploring impact of the EED 420 Science Methods Course on pre-service elementary teachers views regarding the nature of science. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(3), 219-232.
Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, Article 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
Biber, A. C., Tuna, A., Gulsevincler, D., & Karaosmanoglu, A. B. (2015). The view of mathematics teachers about the 5E instructional model. Erzincan Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 17(1), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.17556/jef.02989
Bozdogan, A. E., & Altunçekiç, A. (2007). Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin 5E ogretim modelinin kullanilabilirligi hakkındaki gorusleri [The opinions of science teacher candidates about the usability of the 5E teaching model]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(2), 579-590.
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc14_051_08_10
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, A. J., Gardner, A., Van Scotteer, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications [Full report]. Colorado Springs, CO: Biological Science Curriculum Study.
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, J., & Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science & Medicine, 56(4), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3
Celik, H., Pektaş, H. M., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2018). Science teaching laboratory applications: Common knowledge construction, learning cycle models and stem approach. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 9(3), 11-29.
Demirbaş, M., & Pektaş, H. M. (2015). Evaluation of experiments conducted about 5E learning cycle model and determination of the problems encountered. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2015.01.005
Duran, L. B., & Duran, E, (2004). The 5E instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching, The Science Education Review, 3(2), 49-58.
Duran, L. B., McArthur, J., & Hook, S. V. (2004). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of an inquiry-based physics course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(2), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.000
Enugu, R., & Hokayem, H. (2017). Challenges pre-service teachers face when implementing a 5E inquiry model of instruction. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 178-209.
Fletcher, S. S., & Luft, J. A. (2011). Early career secondary science teachers: A longitudinal study of beliefs in relation to field experiences. Science Education, 95(6), 1124-1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20450
Iscan, C. D., Bayraktar, A., & Gokce, E. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ teaching applications based on 5E learning cycle. Anthropologist, 20(1, 2), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891730
Kirschner, P., & Selinger, M. (2003). The state of affairs of teacher education with respect to ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390300200143
Lewis, E., Dema, O., & Harshbarger, D. (2014). Preparation for practice: Elementary preservice teachers learning and using scientific classroom discourse community instructional strategies. School Science and Mathematics, 114(4), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12067
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Ludvigsen, M. S., Hall, E. O., Meyer, G., Fegran, L., Aagaard, H., & Uhrenfeldt, L. (2016). Using Sandelowski and Barroso’s meta-synthesis method in advancing qualitative evidence. Qualitative Health Research, 26(3), 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576493
Maier, S. J., & Marek, E. A. (2006). The learning cycle: A reintroduction. The Physics Teacher, 44(2), 109-113. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2165443
Marshall, J. C., & Smart, J. B. (2013). Teachers’ transformation to inquiry-based instructional practice. Creative Education, 4(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42019
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
Metin, M., & Özmen, H. (2009). Sinif ogretmeni adaylarinin yapilandirmaci kuramin 5E modeline uygun etkinlikler tasarlarken ve uygularken karsilastiklari sorunlar [Problems faced by prospective classroom teachers while designing and implementing activities in accordance with the 5E model of constructivist theory]. Necatibey Egitim Fakultesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Egitimi Dergisi, 3(2), 94-123.
Metin, M., Coskun, K., Birisci, S., & Kaleli Yilmaz, G. (2011). Opinions of prospective teachers about utilizing the 5E instructional model. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 3(4), 411-422.
Namdar, B., & Kucuk, M. (2018). Preservice science teachers’ practices of critiquing and revising 5E lesson plans. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(6), 468-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1469188
Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985000
Polgampala, A. S. V., Shen, H., & Huang, F. (2016). The impact on teaching through 5E model: Perspectives of prospective teachers in teaching science in secondary in Gampaha District Sri Lanka. Educational Perspectives, 5(1), 33-47.
Qablan, A. M., & DeBaz, T. (2015). Facilitating elementary science teachers’ implementation of inquiry-based science teaching. Teacher Development, 19(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.959552
Rehmat, A. P., & Bailey, J. M. (2014). Technology integration in a science classroom: Preservice teachers’ perceptions. Journal Science Education Technology, 23, 744-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9507-7
Ross, D. K., & Cartier, J. L. (2015). Developing pre-service elementary teachers’ pedagogical practices while planning using the learning cycle. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(6), 573-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9439-y
Sahin, C., Cavus, S., & Gungoren S. (2013). Examining usage trends of computer support of the prospective primary school teachers in the science education based on the 5E model. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1913-1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.494
Savenye, W. C., & Robinson, R. S. (2005). Using qualitative research methods in higher education. Journal of Computer Higher Education,16(2), 65-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961475
Shaw, R. L., Booth, A., Sutton, A. J., Miller, T., Smith, J. A., Young, B., Jones, D. R., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2004). Finding qualitative research: An evaluation of search strategies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16, 4-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-5
Sickel, A. J., & Friedrichsen, P. (2015). Belief, practice knowledge, and context: A longitudinal study of a begging biology teacher’s 5E unit. School Science and Mathematics,115(2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12102
Smolleck, L., & Mongan, A. (2011). Changes in preservice teachers’ self-efficacy: From science methods to student teaching. Journal of Educational and Development Psychology, 1(1), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v1n1p133
Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737021001001
Toraman, C., & Demir, E. (2016). The effect of constructivism on attitudes towards lessons: A meta-analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(62), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.62.8
Turan, S., & Matteson, S. M. (2021). Middle school mathematics classrooms practice based on 5E instructional model. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 9(1), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1041
Varma, T., Volkmann, M. J., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceptions of their understanding of inquiry and inquiry-based science pedagogy: Influence of an elementary science education methods course and a science field experience. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182354
Walia, P. (2012). Effect of 5E instructional model on mathematical creativity of students. Golden Research Thought, 1(10), 1-4.
Yildiz, B., & Kocak Usluel, Y. (2016). A model proposal on ICT integration for effective mathematics instruction. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 31(1), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2015013971

How to cite this article

APA

Turan, S. (2021). Pre-Service Teacher Experiences of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1994. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11102

Vancouver

Turan S. Pre-Service Teacher Experiences of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(8):em1994. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11102

AMA

Turan S. Pre-Service Teacher Experiences of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(8), em1994. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11102

Chicago

Turan, Serife. "Pre-Service Teacher Experiences of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 8 (2021): em1994. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11102

Harvard

Turan, S. (2021). Pre-Service Teacher Experiences of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1994. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11102

MLA

Turan, Serife "Pre-Service Teacher Experiences of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 8, 2021, em1994. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11102