• AAM. (1992). Excellence and Equity: Education and Public Dimension of Museums. Washington, DC: The American Association of Museums, 8-9.
• Bucknavage, M. W., & Cutter, C. N. (2009). Hazard analysis of critical control points. Microbiologically Safe Foods, 435.
• Chang, Y. H., Lin, Y. K., Fang, R. J., & Lu, Y. T. (2017). A Situated Cultural Festival Learning System Based on Motion Sensing. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(3).
• Chang, Y. S., & Wang, C. C. (2012). Why Are Players Being Immersed in Online Game? A Study on the Game’s Creating Value of Emotion for Players, International Journal of Digital Media Design, 4(1), 49-67.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-339.
• Ellington, H., Adinall, E., & Percival, F. (1982). A Handbook of Game Design. London, Kogan Page.
• Fan, K. K., Xiao, P. W., & Su, C. H. (2015). The Effects of Learning Styles and Meaningful Learning on the Learning Achievement of Gamification Health Education Curriculum, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 1211-1229.
• Hsu, C. L., & Lin, J. C. (2008). Acceptance of Blog Usage: The Roles of Technology Acceptance, Social Influence and Knowledge Sharing Motivation. Information & Management, 45, 65-74.
• Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2007). Consumer Behavior in Online Game Communities: A motivation factor perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1642-1659.
• Jackson, S. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. C. (1999). Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D., (2003). Mathematics and Geometry Education with Collaborative Augmented Reality. Computers & Graphics, 27, 339-345.
• Kristof, R., & Satran, A. (1995). Interactivity by design: Creating & Communicating with New Media. Mountain View, CA: Adobe Press.
• Kuflik, T., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Gorfinkel, A., Jbara, S., Kats, S., & Kashtan, N., (2011). A visitor’s guide in an active museum: Presentations, communications, and reflection. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH), 3(3), 11.
• Luo, W., & Strong, D. (2000). Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance, European Journal of Information Systems, 9(2), 91-103.
• Massimini, F., & Carli, M. (1988). The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & I. Csikszentmihalyi, (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp.266-287). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Mathieson, K., & Chin, W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. The Data Base for Advances in Information System, 32(3), 86-112.
• Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information and Management, 38(4), 217-230.
• Nielsen, J. (1995). 10 usability heuristics for user interface design. Nielsen Norman Group, 1(1).
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Pine II, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The Experience Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Rettie, R. (2001). An exploration of flow during Internet use, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Application and Policy, 11(2), 103-113.
• TCS. (2017). Taiwan Communication Survey: epaper July 2017. Retrieved on 21 July 2017 from http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/epaper/%E7%AC%AC56%E6%9C%9F20170728.htm.
• Teo, T., Lim, V., & Lai, R. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage, OMGGA International Journal of Management Science, 27(1), 25-37.
• Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. (2002). User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model, Decision Science, 33(2), 297-315.
• Watts, B. J. (1999). Interactive media in museum environments: Perceptions about its and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Winogard, T. (1997). The Design of Interaction, Beyond Calculation: The Next Fifty Years of Computing, 149-162.

Vancouver

Chang Y. The Effect Assessment of Reading Experience and Use Intention for AR Interactive Device. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(1):531-42. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80611

APA

Chang, Y. (2018). The Effect Assessment of Reading Experience and Use Intention for AR Interactive Device. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 531-542. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80611

AMA

Chang Y. The Effect Assessment of Reading Experience and Use Intention for AR Interactive Device. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(1), 531-542. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80611

Chicago

Chang, Yuh-Shihng. "The Effect Assessment of Reading Experience and Use Intention for AR Interactive Device". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 1 (2018): 531-542. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80611

Harvard

Chang, Y. (2018). The Effect Assessment of Reading Experience and Use Intention for AR Interactive Device. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), pp. 531-542. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80611

MLA

Chang, Yuh-Shihng "The Effect Assessment of Reading Experience and Use Intention for AR Interactive Device". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 1, 2018, pp. 531-542. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80611