• Bolte, C. (1996). Aspects of science instruction in the view of German junior high school students - Conception and application of the com­puter-assisted procedure for the ana­lysis of motivational learning climate issues in biology, chemistry and physics instruction. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), USA. (Polyscript).
• Bolte, C. (2001). How to enhance students’ motivation and ability to communicate in science class-discourse. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, A. Kross, & P. Reiska (Eds.), Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future (pp. 277-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_38
• Bolte, C. (2004). Motivationales Lernklima im Chemieunterricht [Motivational learning climate in chemistry classes]. Praxis der Naturwissenschaften Chemie in der Schule, 53(7), 33.
• Bolte, C. (2006a). As good as it gets: The MoLE-instrument for the evaluation of science instruction. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Association for the Research on Science Education (NARST), USA.
• Bolte, C. (2006b). Evaluating science instruction by using the motivational learning environment questionnaire. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), USA.
• Bolte, C. (2010). Contemporary scientific literacy and the (ir-)relevance of science education. In I. Eilks & B. Ralle (Eds.), Contemporary scientific education – Implications from science education research for orientation, strategies and assessment (pp. 23-34). Shaker.
• Bolte, C. (2012). How to analyse and assess students’ motivation to learn chemistry. In M. Kapanadze, & I. Eilks (Eds.), Student Active Learning in Science (pp. 85-91). Ilia State University Press.
• Bolte, C. (2014). Evaluating students gains in PROFILES. In C. Bolte, & F. Rauch (Eds.), Enhancing inquiry-based science education and teachers’ continuous professional development in Europe: Insights and reflections on the PROFILES Project and other projects funded by the European Commission (pp. 48-51). Freie Universität Berlin / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. https://bit.ly/3onmFFL
• Bolte, C., & Schneider, V. (2014). Chemistry in Projects (ChiP) – An evidence-based continuous professional development programme and its evaluation regarding teacher ownership and students gains. In C. Bolte, J. Holbrook, R. Mamlok-Naaman, & F. Rauch (Eds.), Science teachers’ continuous professional development in Europe: Case studies from the PROFILES Project (pp. 220-230). Freie Universität Berlin / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. https://bit.ly/3ooCmwf
• Bolte, C., & Schulte, T. (2014). Stakeholders’ Views on Empirically based Concepts for Science Education to Enhance Scientific Literacy – Results from the Third Round of the International PROFILES Curricular Delphi Study on Science Education. In C. P. Constantinou, N. Papadouris, & A. Hadjigeorgiou (Eds.), E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference: Science Education Research for Evidence-based Teaching and Coherence in Learning. Part 8 (co-ed. M. Ossevoort & J. A. Nielsen) (pp. 197-204). European Science Education Research Association.
• Bolte, C., & Streller, S. (2012a). Evaluating students active learning in science courses. Chemistry in action! (97), 13-17. https://bit.ly/3vOVlE9
• Bolte, C., & Streller, S. (2012b). A longitudinal study on science interests. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien & P. Clément (Eds.), E-book proceedings of the ESERA 2011 Conference: Science learning and citizenship. Part 10 (co-ed. R. Millar), (pp. 73-79). European Science Education Research Association.
• Bolte, C., & Streller, S. (2012c). Evaluating student gains in the PROFILES Project. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien & P. Clément (Eds.), E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2011 Conference: Science learning and Citizenship. Part 5 (co-eds. L. Maurines, & A. Redfors), (pp. 9-15). European Science Education Research Association.
• Bolte, C., Schulte, T., Kapanadze, M., & Slovinsky, E. (2012b). Stakeholders’ views on desirable science education in Georgia. In M. Kapanadze, & I. Eilks (Eds.), Student active learning in science (pp.79-84). Ilia State University Press.
• Bolte, C., Steller, S., & Hofstein, A. (2013). How to Motivate students and raise their interest in chemistry education. In I. Eilks, A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – A studybook: A practical guide and textbook for student teachers, teacher trainees and teachers (pp. 67-95). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5_3
• Bolte, C., Streller, S., Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Rauch, F. (2012). Introduction into the PROFILES Project and its philosophy. In C. Bolte, J. Holbrook, & F. Rauch (Eds.), Inquiry-based science education in Europe: Reflections from the PROFILES Project (pp. 31-42). Freie Universität Berlin / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. https://bit.ly/3op6DuM
• Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.
• Devetak, I., Glažar, S. A., Juriševič, M., & Vogrinc, M. M. J. (2014). Students’ motivation and achievements in lower-secondary school science subjects - Slovenian PROFILES perspectives. In C. P. Constantinou, N. Papadouris & A. Hadjigeorgiou (Eds.), E-Book Proceedings of the ESERA 2013 Conference: Science education research for evidence-based teaching and coherence in learning. Part 2 (co-eds. J. Lavonen, & A. Zeyer), (pp.11-18). European Science Education Research Association.
• Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (2005). Case‐based long‐term professional development of science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(12), 1413-1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500102946
• Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
• Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.), (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press.
• Eilks, I., Marks, R., & Feierabend, T. (2008). Science education research to prepare future citizens – Chemistry learning in a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach. In B. Ralle & I. Eilks (Eds.), Promoting successful science learning – The worth of science education research (pp. 75-86). Shaker.
• Eilks. I., Rauch. F., Ralle. B., & Hofstein. A. (2013). How to allocate the chemistry curriculum between science and society. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – A studybook: A practical guide and textbook for student teachers, teacher trainees and teachers (pp. 1-36). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5_1
• Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International journal of science education, 28(9), 957-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
• Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context‐based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
• Glynn, S. M., & Koballa, T. R., Jr. (2006). Motivation to learn college science. In J. J. Mintzes & W. H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25-32). National Sciences Teachers Association Press.
• Hartikainen-Ahia, A., Sormunen, K., Jäppinen I., & Kärkkäinen, S., (2014). Scenarios – A motivational approach towards inquiry-based learning. In C. Bolte & F. Rauch (Eds.), Enhancing inquiry-based science education and teachers continuous professional development in Europe: Insights and reflections on PROFILES and other projects funded by the European Commission (pp. 66-72). Freie Universität Berlin / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. https://bit.ly/2M8ZYbg
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
• Hofstein, A., & Kesner, M. (2006). Industrial chemistry and school chemistry: making chemistry studies more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1017-1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702504
• Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2014). From the PROFILES continuous professional development programme to the development of a sense of ownership. In C. Bolte, & F. Rauch (Eds.), Enhancing inquiry-based science education and teachers’ continuous professional development in Europe: Insights and reflections on the PROFILES project and other projects funded by the European Commission (pp. 44-48). Freie Universität Berlin / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. https://bit.ly/2M8ZYbg
• Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2010). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education. In I. Eilks, & B. Ralle (Eds.), Contemporary science education (pp. 5-22). Shaker.
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 275-288.
• Kapanadze, M., & Eilks, I. (2014). Supporting reform in science education in Central and Eastern Europe - Reflections and perspectives from the Project TEMPUS-SALiS. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1016a
• Kapanadze, M., & Slovinsky, E. (2014a). Inquiry science education with in the Project PROFILES in Georgia. In C. Bolte, & F. Rauch (Eds.), Enhancing inquiry-based science education and teachers’ continuous professional development in Europe: Insights and reflections on the PROFILES project and other projects funded by the European Commission, (pp. 112-118). Freie Universität Berlin / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. https://bit.ly/2M8ZYbg
• Kapanadze, M., & Slovinsky, E. (2014b). Teachers’ ownership towards developing new PROFILES modules. In C., Bolte, & F. Rauch (Eds.), Enhancing inquiry-based science education and teachers’ continuous professional development in Europe: Insights and reflections on the PROFILES project and other projects funded by the European Commission (pp. 118-122). Freie Universität Berlin / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. https://bit.ly/2M8ZYbg
• Kapanadze, M., Bolte, C., Schneider, V., & Slovinsky, E. (2015a). Enhancing science teachers’ continuous professional development in the field of inquiry-based science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(2), 254-266. https://bit.ly/3op0H5g
• Kapanadze, M., Bolte, C., Schulte, T., & Slovinsky, E. (2015b). Stakeholders’ views on science education - Curricular delphi study in Georgia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(7), 897-906. https://bit.ly/2U1AXSK
• Kapanadze, M., Janashia, S., & Eilks, I. (2010). From science education in the soviet time, via national reform initiatives, towards an international network to support inquiry-based science education – The case of Georgia and the project SALiS. In I. Eilks, & B. Ralle (Eds.), Contemporary science education (pp. 237-242). Verlag Shaker.
• Kennedy, D., & Lucey, J., (2014). The implementation and evaluation of inquiry-based science education PROFILES modules in second-level schools in Ireland. In C. Bolte, J. Holbrook, R. Mamlok-Naaman, & F. Rauch (Eds.), Science teachers’ continuous professional development in Europe: Case studies from the PROFILES Project (pp. 129-138). Freie Universität Berlin / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. https://bit.ly/3ooCmwf
• Koballa, T. R. Jr., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science education. In S. K. Abell, & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook for research in science education (pp. 75-102). Erlbaum.
• Krapp, A. (2002). An Educational-psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In: E. Deci, R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 405-427). University of Rochester.
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M., (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings, International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
• MoES (2015). Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sport of Georgia. www.mes.gov.ge
• NAEC (2017). PISA 2015 results (Georgia). National Assessment and Examinations Center, Tbilisi.
• NCP (2014). The National Curriculum Portal, Georgia. www.ncp.ge
• OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
• Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. The Nuffield Foundation.
• Prenzel, M. (1992). The selective persistence of interest. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 71-98). Erlbaum.
• PROFILES Consortium (2010). Professional reflection-oriented focus on inquiry-based learning and education through science. www.profiles-project.eu
• PROFILES Georgia (2014). Professional reflection-oriented focus on inquiry-based learning and education through science – Georgia. www.profiles-georgia.iliauni.edu.ge
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socio scientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 909-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327
• SALiS (2011). Student active learning in science. www.salislab.org
• Schindler, D., Markic, S., Stuckey, M., & Eilks, I. (2014). What should I do with my old cell phone? A case of collaborative curriculum development within PROFILES-Bremen. In C. Bolte, J. Holbrook, R. Mamlok-Naaman, & F. Rauch (Eds.), Science teachers’ continuous professional development in Europe: Case studies from the PROFILES Project (pp. 103-119). Freie Universität Berlin / Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt. https://bit.ly/3ooCmwf
• Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. University of Oslo.
• Stolz, M., Witteck, T., Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). Reflecting socio-scientific issues for science education coming from the case of curriculum development on doping in chemistry education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.945a
• Stuckey, M., & Eilks, I. (2014). Increasing student motivation and the perception of chemistry’s relevance in the classroom by learning about tattooing from a chemical and societal view. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(2), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00146F
• Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
• Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737
• Wood, R. (2019). Students’ motivation to engage with science learning activities through the lens of self-determination theory: Results from a single-case school-based study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), em1718. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106110
• World Bank (2006). Georgia - Education system realignment and strengthening program (English). World Bank. https://bit.ly/2NJ4jlV
• World Bank (2014). Georgia education sector policy review: Strategic issues and reform agenda. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/26443
• Zeidler D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). A research based framework for socio-scientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

APA

Slovinsky, E., Kapanadze, M., & Bolte, C. (2021). The Effect of a Socio-Scientific Context-Based Science Teaching Program on Motivational Aspects of the Learning Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1992. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11070

Vancouver

Slovinsky E, Kapanadze M, Bolte C. The Effect of a Socio-Scientific Context-Based Science Teaching Program on Motivational Aspects of the Learning Environment. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(8):em1992. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11070

AMA

Slovinsky E, Kapanadze M, Bolte C. The Effect of a Socio-Scientific Context-Based Science Teaching Program on Motivational Aspects of the Learning Environment. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(8), em1992. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11070

Chicago

Slovinsky, Ekaterine, Marika Kapanadze, and Claus Bolte. "The Effect of a Socio-Scientific Context-Based Science Teaching Program on Motivational Aspects of the Learning Environment". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 8 (2021): em1992. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11070

Harvard

Slovinsky, E., Kapanadze, M., and Bolte, C. (2021). The Effect of a Socio-Scientific Context-Based Science Teaching Program on Motivational Aspects of the Learning Environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), em1992. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11070

MLA

Slovinsky, Ekaterine et al. "The Effect of a Socio-Scientific Context-Based Science Teaching Program on Motivational Aspects of the Learning Environment". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 8, 2021, em1992. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11070