• Ausubel, D. P. (1977). The facilitation of meaningful verbal learning in the classroom. Educational psychologist, 12(2), 162-178.
• Aydin, S., Aydemir, N., Boz, Y., Cetin-Dindar, A., & Bektas, O. (2009). The Contribution of Constructivist Instruction Accompanied by Concept Mapping in Enhancing Pre-service Chemistry Teachers' Conceptual Understanding of Chemistry in the Laboratory Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(6), 518-534.
• Basque, J., & Lavoie, M.-C. (2006). Collaborative concept mapping in education: Major research trends. In A. J. Cañas & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology: Vol. 1. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping (pp. 79 – 86). San Jose´: Universidad de Costa Rica.
• Beel, J., Langer, S., Genzmehr, M., & Gipp, B. (2014). Utilizing mind-maps for information retrieval and user modelling. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on User Modelling, Adaption, and Personalization. 8538, 301-313.
• Brandt, L., Elen, J., Hellemans, J., Heerman, L., Couwenberg, I., Volckaert, L., & Morisse, H. (2001). The impact of concept mapping and visualization on the learning of secondary school chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1303-1313.
• Brinkmann, A. (2003). Graphical knowledge display–mind mapping and concept mapping as efficient tools in mathematics education. Mathematics Education Review, 16(4), 35-48.
• Butler, K. A., & Lumpe, A. (2008). Student Use of Scaffolding Software: Relationships with Motivation and Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 427-436. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9111-9.
• Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1994). The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain's Untapped Potential. New York: Dutton.
• Chai, J.-X., & Fan, K.-K. (2016). Mobile inverted constructivism: education of interaction technology in social media. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1425-1442.
• Chang, C. C., Yeh, T. K., & Shih, C. M. (2016). The Effects of Integrating Computer-based Concept Mapping for Physics Learning in Junior High School. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9).
• Chang, C. Y., Yeh, T. K., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2010). The Positive and Negative Effects of Science Concept Tests on Student Conceptual Understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 265-282.
• Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, S. F. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 21-33. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2729.2001.00156.x.
• Chiou, C.-C., Lee, L.-T., Tien, L.-C., & Wang, Y.-M. (2017). Analyzing the Effects of various Concept Mapping Techniques on Learning Achievement under different Learning Styles. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 13(7), 3687-3708.
• Chiu, Y. C., Jen, C. H., Chang, C. Y., Lee, P. L., & Yeh, T. K. (2016). Learning Seismology through Inquiry: Structured, Guided, or Both? Seismological Research Letters, 87(4), 998-1007.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.).Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Daley, B. J., & Torre, D. M. (2010). Concept maps in medical education: an analytical literature review. Medical education, 44(5), 440-448.
• Derbentseva, N., Safayeni, F., & Canas, A. J. (2007). Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 448-465. doi: 10.1002/tea.20153.
• Didis, N., Ozcan, O., & Azar, A. (2014). What do Pre-Service Physics Teachers Know and Think about Concept Mapping? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 77-87.
• Eden, C. (2004). Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(3), 673-686.
• Erdogan, Y. (2009). Paper‐based and computer‐based concept mappings: The effects on computer achievement, computer anxiety and computer attitude. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 821-836.
• Gao, H., Shen, E., Losh, S., & Turner, J. (2007). A review of studies on collaborative concept mapping: What have we learned about the technique and what is next? Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 479.
• Hsiao, C.-H., Wu, Y.-T., Lin, C.-Y., Wong, T. W., Fu, H.-H., Yeh, T.-K., & Chang, C.-Y. (2014). Development of an instrument for assessing senior high school students’ preferred and perceived laboratory classroom environment. Learning Environments Research, 17(3), 389-399.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Education, 12, 5-24.
• Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking: Prentice Hall.
• Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350-374.
• Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772-775.
• Kwon, S. Y., & Cifuentes, L. (2009). The comparative effect of individually-constructed vs. collaboratively-constructed computer-based concept maps. Computers & Education, 52(2), 365-375.
• Ledger, A. F. (2003). The effects of collaborative concept mapping on the achievement, science self-efficacy and attitude toward science of female eighth-grade students: Unpublished Dissertation.
• Mutodi, P., & Chigonga, B. (2016). Concept map as an assessment tool in secondary school mathematics: An analysis of teachers' perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(10), 2685-2696.
• Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.
• Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27-45.
• Pankratius, W. J., & Keith, T. M. (1987). Building an organized knowledge base: Concept mapping in secondary school science. Paper presented at the The 35th Annual Meeting of the National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC.
• Poehler, B., & Prediger, S. (2015). Intertwining Lexical and Conceptual Learning Trajectories - A Design Research Study on Dual Macro-Scaffolding towards Percentages. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1697-1722.
• Rennie, L. J. (1998). Improving the interpretation and reporting of quantitative research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(3), 237-248.
• Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research of cooperative learning. Educational leadership, 48(5), 71-82.
• Stensvold, M., & Wilson, J. T. (1992). Using concept maps as a tool to apply chemistry concepts to laboratory activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 230-232.
• Suthers, D. D. (2001). Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learing discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7(3), 254-277.
• Yeh, T.-K., Huang, H.-M., Chan, W. P., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016). Effects of congruence between preferred and perceived learning environments in nursing education in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open, 6(5), e009925.
• Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization science, 13(3), 339-351.

Vancouver

Chang C, Liu G, Chen K, Huang C, Lai Y, Yeh T. The Effects of a Collaborative Computer-based Concept Mapping Strategy on Geographic Science Performance in Junior High School Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8):5049-60. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a

APA

Chang, C., Liu, G., Chen, K., Huang, C., Lai, Y., & Yeh, T. (2017). The Effects of a Collaborative Computer-based Concept Mapping Strategy on Geographic Science Performance in Junior High School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5049-5060. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a

AMA

Chang C, Liu G, Chen K, Huang C, Lai Y, Yeh T. The Effects of a Collaborative Computer-based Concept Mapping Strategy on Geographic Science Performance in Junior High School Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8), 5049-5060. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a

Chicago

Chang, Cheng-Chieh, Guan-Ying Liu, Kuang-Jung Chen, Cheng-Hao Huang, Yu-Ming Lai, and Ting-Kuang Yeh. "The Effects of a Collaborative Computer-based Concept Mapping Strategy on Geographic Science Performance in Junior High School Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 8 (2017): 5049-5060. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a

Harvard

Chang, C., Liu, G., Chen, K., Huang, C., Lai, Y., and Yeh, T. (2017). The Effects of a Collaborative Computer-based Concept Mapping Strategy on Geographic Science Performance in Junior High School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), pp. 5049-5060. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a

MLA

Chang, Cheng-Chieh et al. "The Effects of a Collaborative Computer-based Concept Mapping Strategy on Geographic Science Performance in Junior High School Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 8, 2017, pp. 5049-5060. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a