• Anderson, J. (2011). Architectural design. Switzerland: AVA Publishing SA.
• Anthony, K. H. (2002). Designing for diversity: Implications for architectural education in the twenty-first century, Journal of Architectural Education, 55, 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1162/104648802753657969.
• Anthony, K. H. (2012). Studio culture and student life. In J. Ockman (Ed.), Architecture school three centuries of educating architects in North America (pp. 396-401). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Aydınlı, S. (2003). Mimarlık eğitiminde değişen öncelikler. In Mimar.ist’ten seçmeler mimarlık eğitimi yazıları (2001-2003) (pp. 41-45). Istanbul, Turkey: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Istanbul Büyükkent Şubesi.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: Istatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 7, 3-7.
• Ciravoğlu, A. (2003). Mimari tasarım eğitiminde formel ve enformel çalışmalar üzerine, Yapı, 257, 43-47.
• Colomina, B., Choi, E., Galán, I. G., & Meister, A.-M. (2012). Radical Pedagogies in Architectural Education. Retrieved on February 3, 2018 from http://www.architectural-review.com/education/radical-pedagogies-in-architectural-education/8636066.article.
• Cross, N. (1995). Discovering design ability, discovering design: explorations in design studies. R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity: Using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. London: Harper Collins.
• DeVries, R., & Zan, B. (2005). A constructivist perspective on the role of the sociomoral atmosphere in promoting children’s development. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: theory, perspectives, and practice, New York: Teachers College Press.
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.
• Do, E., & Gross, M. D. (1996). Drawing as a means to design reasoning, artificial intelligence in design ‘96. Workshop on Visual Representation, Reasoning and Interaction in Design, pp. 1-10.
• Fasli, M., & Hassanpour, B. (2016). Rotational critique system as a method of culture change in an architecture design studio: urban design studio as case study, Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1174142.
• Fisher, R. (2005). Teaching children to learn (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
• Galán, I. G. (2015). Radical Pedagogies: School and Institute of Architecture of Valparaíso (1952-1972). Retrieved on February 3, 2018 from http://www.archdaily.com/775162/radical-pedagogies-school-and-institute-of-architecture-of-valparaiso-1952-1972.
• Gür, Ş. Ö. (1996). Mekân örgütlenmesi. Trabzon, Turkey: Gür Yayıncılık.
• Lang, J. (1998). Öğrenciler için mimarlığa giriş: Temel tasarım dersini yeniden düşünmek. In N. Teymur & T. Aytaç-Dural (Eds.), Temel tasarım/temel eğitim (pp. 3-14). Ankara: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları.
• McCaslin, N. (1990). Creative drama in the classroom. New York: Longman Group.
• Papanek, V. (1997). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. London: Thames and Hudson.
• Rapoport, A. (2004). Kültür mimarlık tasarım. Istanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları.
• Rittel, H. (1985). Tasarım eğitiminin tasarımına ilişkin bazı ilkeler. Mimarlık, 85, 8, 20-22.
• Rodríguez Bernal, C. M. (2016). Student-centred strategies to integrate theoretical knowledge into project development within architectural technology lecture-based modules, Architectural Engineering and Design Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2016.1230535.
• Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potential. London: RIBA Publications Ltd.
• Schön, D. A. (2003). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Bodmin, Cornwall: MPG Books Ltd.
• Schweder, A. (n.d.). Retrieved on February 3, 2018 from http://www.alexschweder.com/works/.
• The National Architectural Accrediting Board (2014). Retrieved from http://ced.berkeley.edu/downloads/academic/accreditation/2014_NAAB_Conditions.pdf.
• UIA Mimarlık Eğitimi Komisyonu (2002). UIA ve Mimarlık Eğitimi Düşünceler ve Tavsiyeler (A. Ülkütekin, Trans.). Retrieved on February 1, 2018 from http://www.mo.org.tr/UIKDocs/reflectionsTR.pdf.

APA

Kılıçaslan, H., & Vural, S. (2018). The Effects of Creative Drama Teaching Methods on Academic Success in Architectural Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2157-2167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86613

Vancouver

Kılıçaslan H, Vural S. The Effects of Creative Drama Teaching Methods on Academic Success in Architectural Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(6):2157-67. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86613

AMA

Kılıçaslan H, Vural S. The Effects of Creative Drama Teaching Methods on Academic Success in Architectural Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(6), 2157-2167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86613

Chicago

Kılıçaslan, Hare, and Serbülent Vural. "The Effects of Creative Drama Teaching Methods on Academic Success in Architectural Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 6 (2018): 2157-2167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86613

Harvard

Kılıçaslan, H., and Vural, S. (2018). The Effects of Creative Drama Teaching Methods on Academic Success in Architectural Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), pp. 2157-2167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86613

MLA

Kılıçaslan, Hare et al. "The Effects of Creative Drama Teaching Methods on Academic Success in Architectural Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 6, 2018, pp. 2157-2167. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86613