Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates

Fatima Yousif Husain; Sufian Forawi; Chun-Yen Chang

doi:10.29333/ejmste/13424

Full Text (PDF)

Fatima Yousif Husain ¹ ^* , Sufian Forawi ¹ , Chun-Yen Chang ² ³

More Detail

¹ Department of Education, The British University in Dubai, Khalifa City, UAE² Science Education Center, Graduate Institute of Science Education, Department of Earth Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, TAIWAN³ Department of Biology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jawa Timur, INDONESIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Increasing communication between government schools, universities, and industry can benefit STEM education programs and STEM careers. These collaborations are pertinent in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) because the nation is aiming to meet the growing demand for a future STEM workforce by increasing the number of students pursuing STEM careers. The main purpose of the study is to investigate the stakeholder’s perceptions and responses on STEM education programs, STEM careers, and triple helix components (THC) in the UAE. The researcher employed a quantitative methods approach for this study that used questionnaires. The results from this study showed that the stakeholders had positive perceptions on STEM education programs, STEM careers, and THC. Further investigation is needed to gain more information about the significant differences in perspectives between and within the stakeholder clusters.

Keywords

triple helix components
STEM education programs
STEM career development

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2023, Volume 19, Issue 8, Article No: em2303

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424

Publication date: 01 Aug 2023

Online publication date: 21 Jun 2023

Article Views: 1161

Article Downloads: 637

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Achzab, A., Budiyanto, C., & Budianto, A. (2018, September). Analysis of the 21st century skills achievement using constructivist learning with Arduino based driverless vehicle technology. In K. B. Sangka, I. Widiastuti, P. N. Y. Indriyanti, N. M. Nordin, R. Mustapha, & S.-T. A. Hung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4^th International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2018 (pp. 201-205). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-18.2018.35
ADEK. (2020). Our partner. Abu Dhabi Department of Education and Knowledge: Activity Platform. https://activityplatform.adek.gov.ae/
Admawati, H., Jumadi, J., & Nursyahidah, F. (2018). The effect of STEM project-based learning on students’ scientific attitude based on social constructivism theory. In R. Ekawati (Ed.), Proceedings of the Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (pp. 191-194). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.65
Ahmed, H. O. K. (2016). Strategic future directions for developing STEM education in higher education in Egypt as a driver of innovation economy. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(8), 127-145. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1095333.pdf
Al Murshidi, G. (2019). STEM education in the United Arab Emirates: Challenges and possibilities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(12), 316-332. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.12.18
Anderhag, P., Wickman, P. O., Bergqvist, K., Jakobson, B., Hamza, K. M. & Säljö, R. (2016). Why do secondary school students lose their interest in science? Or does it never emerge? A possible and overlooked explanation. Science Education, 100(5), 791-813. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21231
Andrée, M., & Hansson, L. (2020). Industrial actors and their rationales for engaging in STEM education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(4), 551-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1682055
Ashour, S. (2020). Quality higher education is the foundation of a knowledge society: Where does the UAE stand? Quality in Higher Education, 26(2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1769263
Bell, M. L., Whitehead, A. L., & Julious, S. A. (2018). Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes. Clinical Epidemiology, 10, 153-157. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S146397
British Council. (2018). Future skills supporting the UAE’s future workforce. https://www.britishcouncil.ae/sites/default/files/bc_futureskills_english_1mar18_3.pdf
Burnette, J. L., Pollack, J. M., Forsyth, R. B., Hoyt, C. L., Babij, A. D., Thomas, F. N., & Coy, A. E. (2019). A growth mindset intervention: Enhancing students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy and career development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 5(20), 878-908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719864293
Cai, Y., & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the triple helix model: Past, present, and future. Triple Helix, 7(2-3), 189-226. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10003
Cai, Y., & Liu, C. (2020). The role of university as institutional entrepreneur in regional innovation system: Towards an analytical framework. In M. T. Preto, A. Daniel, & A. Teixeira (Eds.), Examining the role of entrepreneurial universities in regional development (pp. 133-155). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0174-0
Canrinus, E. T., Klette, K., Hammerness, K., & Bergem, O. K. (2019). Opportunities to enact practice in campus courses: Taking a student perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 25(1), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1526171
Cedefop. (2016). Skill shortages in Europe: Which occupations are in demand–and why. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/news-and-press/news/skill-shortages-europe-which-occupations-are-demand-and-why
Ceglie, R. J., & Setlage, J. (2016). College student persistence in scientific disciplines: Cultural and social capital as contributing factors. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9592-3
Chryssou, C. E. (2020). University-industry interactions in the Sultanate of Oman: Challenges and opportunities. Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219896748
Cinar, S., Pirasa, N., & Sadoglu, G. P. (2016). Views of science and mathematics pre-service teachers regarding STEM. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1479-1487. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040628
Colter, D. D. (2018). A study of urban principals’ perceptions of technology implementation and STEM program sustainability [Doctoral dissertation, University of New England].
Creswell J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2014). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. Pearson.
D’Este P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
DeCoito, I. (2016). STEM education in Canada: A knowledge synthesis. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166297
Desai, N., & Manjunath, V. S. (2018). Role and challenges of universities in a triple helix model [Paper presentation]. The National Conference on Trending Research in Engineering, Science, and Management.
Dickson, M., Fidalgo, P. & Cairns, D. (2019). The ‘S’ and ‘T’ in STEM: Integrating science and technology in education in the UAE. In K. Gallagher (Ed.), Education in the United Arab Emirates: Innovation and transformation (pp. 95-111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7736-5_6
Ehlers, U. D. (2020). Future skills: The future of learning and higher education. McFarland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29297-3
El-Deghaidy, H., & Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of STEM education: Possibilities and challenges. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.1.1.51-54
Eltanahy, M., Forawi, S., & Mansour, N. (2020). STEM leaders and teachers views of integrating entrepreneurial practices into STEM education in high school in the United Arab Emirates. Entrepreneurship Education, 3, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-020-00027-3
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929605
Etzkowitz, H. & Zhou, C. (2017). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620183
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 2-5.
Fernández-Nogueira, D., Arruti, A., Markuerkiaga, L., & Saenz, N. (2018). The entrepreneurial university: A selection of good practices. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(3), 1-17.
FLL. (2020). Inspiring youth through hands-on STEM learning. First Lego League. https://www.firstlegoleague.org/
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
Green, A., & Sanderson, D. (2018). The roots of STEM achievement: An analysis of persistence and attainment in STEM majors. The American Economist, 63(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0569434517721770
Habig, B., Gupta, P., Levine, B., & Adams, J. (2020). An informal science education program’s impact on STEM major and STEM career outcomes. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1051-1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9722-y
Hathcock, S. J., Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding for creative product possibilities in a design-based STEM activity. Research in Science Education, 45(5), 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9437-7
Hughes, T. (2014). Co-creation: Moving towards a framework for creating innovation in the Triple Helix. Prometheus, 32(4), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2014.971613
Husain, F. Y. (2022). Investigating the themes and perceptions of the formal and informal STEM education programs, STEM career development, and their connections to the triple helix component in the UAE [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The British University in Dubai.
Jenset, I. S. (2017). Practice-based teacher education coursework: An examination of the extent and characteristics of how teacher education coursework is grounded in practice across six teacher education programs in Finland, Norway and California, US [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Oslo.
Karmokar, S., & Shekar, A. (2018). Outreach programs using the triple helix model to encourage interest in science and engineering among underrepresented youth. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 23(1), 88-103
Kim, S. Y. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution and the triple helix [Paper presentation]. The XV International Triple Helix Conference 2017.
Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. SAGE.
Kupersmidt, J., Stelter, R., Garringer, M., & Bourgoin, J. (2018). STEM mentoring. Supplement to the “elements of effective practice for mentoring.” MENTOR: National Mentoring Partnership. https://www.mentoring.org/resource/stem-mentoring-supplement-to-the-elements-of-effective-practice-for-mentoring/
Lawton Smith, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). The triple helix in the context of global change: Dynamics and challenges. Prometheus, 32(4), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2014.972135
Lent, R. W. (2005). A social cognitive view of career development and counseling. In S. D. Brown, & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 101-127). Wiley.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development, 4(1), 255-311.
Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relations of self-efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.005
Leong, F. T. (2008). Social cognitive career theory. In F. T. L. Leong (Ed.), Encyclopedia of counseling (pp. 1628-1631). SAGE.
Let’s Talk Science. (2017). Canada 2067 learning roadmap. https://canada2067.ca/app/uploads/2018/09/Canada-2067-Learning-Roadmap-FINAL.pdf
Litchfield, B. C., & Dempsey, J. V. (2015). Authentic assessment of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 142(142), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20130
Lowe, C. (1982). The triple helix - NIH, industry, and the academic world. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 55(3-4), 239-246.
Lowery, C. L., Hess, M. E., Hartman, S. L., Kennedy, C., & Mazid, I. (2018). Establishing partnership spaces: Reflections of educational leaders on founding professional development schools. Education Leadership, 19(1), 92-110.
Lund, A., & Eriksen, T. M. (2016). Teacher education as transformation: Some lessons learned from a center for excellence in education. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.2483
Maheady, L., Magiera, K., & Simmons, R. (2016). Building and sustaining school-university partnerships in rural settings: One approach for improving special education service delivery. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 35(2), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051603500205
Mandrup, M., & Jensen, T. L. (2017). Educational action research and triple helix principles in entrepreneurship education: Introducing the EARTH design to explore individuals in triple helix collaboration. Triple Helix, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-017-0048-y
McDonald, K. S., & Waite, A. M. (2019). Future directions: Challenges and solutions facing career readiness and development in STEM fields. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(1), 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422318814552
Milner-Bolotin, M., & Marotto, C. C. (2018). Parental engagement in children’s STEM education. Part I: Meta-analysis of the literature. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology, 6(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.6.1.292
MoE. (2021). Ministry of Education strategic plan 2017-2021. https://www.moe.gov.ae/En/about theMinistry/Pages/MinistryStrategy.aspx
Momeni, F., Arab Mazar Yazdi, A., & Najafi, S. M. S. (2019). Changing economic systems and institutional dimensions of the triple helix model. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0096-1
Moon, B. (2016). Do universities have a role in the education and training of teachers? An international analysis of policy and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Moonesar, I., & Mourtada, R. (2015). Persistence in the Abu Dhabi STEM pipeline: Preparing Emirati youth for careers in the UAE innovation economy. The Emirates Foundation and Mohamed Bin Rashid School of Government. http://www.mbrsg.ae/HOME/PUBLICATIONS/Research-Report-Research-Paper-White-Paper.aspx
Müller, M., Álamos, P., Meckes, L., & Sanyal, A. (2015). Student teachers’ perceptions of opportunities to develop core practices in a Chilean teacher education program [Paper presentation]. The European Conference on Educational Research.
Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, T. K. (2020). STEM education in secondary schools: Teachers’ perspective towards sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(21), 8865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218865
NRF. (2019). National Research Foundation. https://nrf.ae/
Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067-1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863
Pasnik, S., & Hupert, N. (2016). Early STEM learning and the roles of technologies. Education Development Center. https://cct.edc.org/sites/cct.edc.org/files/publications/EarlySTEMTechWhitePaper.pdf
Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science the new institutionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Petersen, E. A., Tillinghast, R. C., Mainiero, C., & Dabiri, S. (2018). A STEM outreach program model: Case study of a US army-based STEM program [Paper presentation]. The 2018 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference.
Peterson, B. (2017). Engaging parents in STEM education. Children’s Technology and Engineering, 22(1), 18-21.
Popovic, G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). Implications of informal education experiences for mathematics teachers’ ability to make connections beyond formal classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 115(3), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12114
Purzer, S., & Shelley, M. (2018). The rise of engineering in STEM education: The “E” in STEM. In M. Shelley, & S. A. Andree (Eds.), Research highlights in STEM education (pp. 38-56). ISRES Publishing.
Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2016). Investigating preservice STEM teacher conceptions of STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 759-774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9633-5
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Entrepreneurship and Knowledge Exchange, 27(4), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
Resnick, L., Asterhan, C., & Clarke, S. (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1
Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti, M., Schroeder, D. C., Delaney, A., Putnam, L., & Cremeans, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4
Rodrigues, C., & Melo, A. (2013). The triple helix model as inspiration for local development policies: An experience-based perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1675-1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01117.x
Sabato, J. & Mackenzie, M. (1982). La producción de tecnología. Autónoma o transnacional [Technology production. Autonomous or transnational]. Editorial Nueva Imagen, S. A. https://repositorio.esocite.la/640/
Scharmer, C.O., & Käufer, K. (2000). Universities as the birthplace for the entrepreneuring human being. Reflections: The SoL Journal on Knowledge, Learning and Change, 1-19. https://www.academia.edu/download/45824008/2000_uni21us.pdf
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2016). Theories of personality. Cengage Learning.
Sen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Kiray, S. A. (2018). STEM skills in the 21st century education. In M. Shelley & S. A. Kiray (Eds), Research highlights in STEM education (pp. 81-101). ISRES Publishing. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED616570.pdf
Shaer, S., Zakzak, L., & Shibl, E. (2019). The STEAM dilemma: Advancing sciences in UAE schools–the case of Dubai. Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government. https://mbrsgcdn.azureedge.net/cmsstorage/mbrsg/files/17/174c88b2-e633-4dc9-9f9a-a473f6c91892.pdf
Shattock, M. (2009). Entrepreneurialism and organizational change in higher education. In M. Shattock (ed.), Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: Diversification and organizational change in European higher education (pp. 1-8). SRHE & Open University Press.
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
Stephens, M., Spraggon M., & Vammalle, C. (2019). Agile government policy council paper session no 13. Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government. https://mbrsgcdn.azureedge.net/cmsstorage/mbrsg/files/eb/eb10cc47-8ed3-4e8c-bb0e-69afe615cf90.pdf
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., & Hellinckx, L. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253479
Vought, R. T. (2018). Charting a course for success: America’s strategy for STEM education. United States White House Office. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2019/05/f62/STEM-Education-Strategic-Plan-2018.pdf
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
Wan Husin, W. N. F., Mohamad Arsad, N., Othman, O., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Iksan, Z. (2016). Fostering students’ 21st century skills through project oriented problem based learning (POPBL) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 17(1), 1-18.
WEF. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf
Wiebe, E., Unfried, A., & Faber, M. (2018). The relationship of STEM attitudes and career interest. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1580. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92286
Williams, G. E. (2017). Teacher experiences on the play-based methods and instructional practices used in half vs. full day kindergarten [Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University].
Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 551-576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846
Yang, D., & Baldwin, S. J. (2020). Using technology to support student learning in an integrated STEM learning environment. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i1.22
Zahran, R., Pettaway, L. D., Waller, L. R., & Waller, S. (2016). Educational leadership: Challenges in United Arab Emirates. The Global eLearning Journal, 5(1), 1-8.

How to cite this article

APA

Husain, F. Y., Forawi, S., & Chang, C.-Y. (2023). Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424

Vancouver

Husain FY, Forawi S, Chang CY. Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(8):em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424

AMA

Husain FY, Forawi S, Chang CY. Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(8), em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424

Chicago

Husain, Fatima Yousif, Sufian Forawi, and Chun-Yen Chang. "Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 8 (2023): em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424

Harvard

Husain, F. Y., Forawi, S., and Chang, C.-Y. (2023). Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(8), em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424

MLA

Husain, Fatima Yousif et al. "Triple helix components supporting STEM education to increase future STEM careers in the United Arab Emirates". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 8, 2023, em2303. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13424