A Comparative Analysis of the Relationship among Quality Instruction, Teacher Self-efficacy, Student Background, and Mathematics Achievement in South Korea and the United States
Ji-Won Son 1 * , Seongwon Han 1, Chungseo Kang 1, Oh Nam Kwon 2
More Detail
1 University at Buffalo-The State University of New York2 Seoul National University* Corresponding Author


The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast student, teacher, and school factors that are associated with student mathematics achievement in South Korea and the United States. Using the data from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2011, this study examines factors that are linked to teachers who deliver quality instruction with high self-efficacy in both countries. We also investigate the association between teachers with high-quality instruction and high self-efficacy and 8th graders’ mathematics achievement. It was found that teachers’ perceived academic emphasis was commonly associated with teachers who claimed to provide high-quality mathematics instruction with high self-efficacy. However, the two countries’ results differed in the association between teachers’ opportunities to learn in professional development programs and high-quality instruction with high self-efficacy. While ‘teachers’ opportunities to learn in professional development programs’ was a significant factor that leads to quality instruction and high self-efficacy in the United States, it was not significant in South Korea. In addition, while students in the United States tended to have higher math achievement scores when their teachers delivered high-quality instruction with high self-efficacy, there was no such association in South Korea.


This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 12, Issue 7, July 2016, 1755-1779


Publication date: 02 Jul 2016

Article Views: 2906

Article Downloads: 1431

Open Access References How to cite this article