Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life - Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Baker, R., & Jones, A. (2005). How can international studies such as the international mathematics and science study and the programme for international student assessment be used to inform practice, policy and future research in science education in New Zealand. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 145-157.
• Barmby, P., Kind, P. M., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075-1093.
• Bennett, J., & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1975-1998.
• Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48(3), 266-79.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. (K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long, Eds.). London: Sage.
• Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. (D. B. Wright, Ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
• Edwards, J., & Fraser, K. (1983). Concept maps as reflectors of conceptual understanding. Research in Science Education, 13(1), 19-26.
• George, R., & Kaplan, D. (1998). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88. Science Education, 82(1), 93-109.
• Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1088-1107.
• Han, J., Omta, S. W. F., & Trienekens, J. H. (2007). The joint impact of supply chain integration and quality management on the performance of pork processing firms in China. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 10(2).
• Hasse, C. (2005). Cultural models of gender in science: Women in physics through the cultural-psychological magnifying glass. In P. Valero & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), University science and mathematics education - Challenges and possibilities (pp. 1-20). København: DCN Press. Retrieved May 20, 2009, from http://www.dpu.dk/everest/showdoc.asp?id=0611201 12844&type=doc.
• Head, J. (1985). The personal response to science. London: Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
• Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children's attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 53-83.
• Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: students' attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 41-57.
• Jenkins, E. W., & Pell, R. G. (2006). The relevance of science education project (ROSE) in England: A summary of findings. Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
• Kaplan, D., & Elliott, P. R. (1997). A model-based approach to validating education indicators using multilevel structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22(3), 323-347.
• KICE. (2007). The results from PISA 2006. Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
• Kim, M., Lavonen, J., & Ogawa, M. (2009). Experts' opinion on the high achievement of scientific literacy in PISA 2003: A comparative study in Finland and Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(4), 379-393.
• Kim, M., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Development of an instrument for measuring affective factors regarding conceptual understanding in high school physics. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(6), 497-509.
• Kim, M., & Song, J. (2009). The effects of dichotomous attitudes toward science on interest and conceptual understanding in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 99999(1), 1-22.
• Koballa, T. R. (1992). Persuasion and attitude change in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 63-80.
• Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 75-102). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• KSF. (2003). Study of the national survey on the students' recognition toward science & technology. Korea Science Foundation.
• Lee, K. (1997). Construction of a structural equation model on attitudes to science using LISREL. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17(3), 301-311.
• Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (1993). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (10th ed.). New Jersey: The Macmillan Company.
• Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report. Chestnut Hill, United States: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
• Matthews, P. (2007). The relevance of science education in Ireland. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.
• Neresini, F., Dimopoulos, K., Kallfass, M., & Peters, H. P. (2009). Exploring a black box: Cross-national study of visit effects on visitors to large physics research centers in Europe. Science Communication, 30(4), 506-533.
• Niaz, M. (1994). Progressive transitions from algorithmic to conceptual understanding in student ability to solve chemistry problems: A Lakatosian interpretation.
• Nieswandt, M. (2005). Attitudes toward science: A review of the field. In S. Alsop (Ed.), Beyond Cartesian Dualism - Encountering Affect in the Teaching and Learning of Science (Vol. 29, pp. 41-52). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Nieswandt, M. (2007). Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 908-937.
• OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world: Volume 1. Paris, France: Organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD).
• Ogawa, M. (2006). Even science lovers do not want to become scientists or engineers: From ROSE data in Japan. CONNECT (UNESCO), 31, 5-9.
• Ogawa, M., & Shimode, S. (2004). Three distinctive groups among Japanese students in terms of their school science preference: From preliminary analysis of Japanese data of an international survey 'the Relevance of Science Education' (ROSE). Journal of Science Education in Japan, 28(4), 279-291.
• Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441 - 467.
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2).
• Ricks, M. (2006). A study of the impact of an informal science education program on middle school students' science knowledge, science attitude, STEM high school and college course selections, and career decisions. The University of Texas at Austin.
• Rohwer, W. D. (1984). An invitation to an educational psychology of studying. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 1- 14.
• Schibeci, R. A. (1984). Attitudes to science: an update. Studies in Science Education, 11, 26-59.
• Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183-212). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbauy Associates, Publishers.
• Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE. Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (The relevance of science education) - A comparative study of students' views of science and science education. Oslo: Dept. of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.
• Scott, B. L. (1985). A defense of multiple choice tests. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1035.
• Smith, W. S., & Erb, T. O. (1986). Effect of women science career role models on early adolescents' attitudes toward scientists and women in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 667-676.
• Song, J., Kim, I. G., Kim, Y. M., Kwon, S., & Oh, W. K. (2004). Map of students' physics misconceptions. Seoul: Book's-hill.
• Stamovlasis, D., Tsaparlis, G., Kamilatos, C., Papaoikonomou, D., & Zarotiadou, E. (2005). Conceptual understanding versus algorithmic problem solving: Further evidence from a national chemistry examination. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(2), 104-118.
• Stark, R. (1999). Measuring science standards in Scottish schools: The assessment of achievement programme. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 27-41.
• Stefánsson, K. K. (2006). ‘I just don’t think it’s me’: A study on the willingness of Icelandic learners to engage in science related issues. Faculty of Education, University of Oslo.
• Tsai, C., & Kuo, P. (2008). Cram school students' conceptions of learning and learning science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 353-375.
• Ziman, J. (1968). Public knowledge: The social dimension of science. Cambridge University Press.

APA

Kim, M., & Song, J. (2010). A Confirmatory Structural Equation Model of Achievement Estimated by Dichotomous Attitudes, Interest, and Conceptual Understanding. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(4), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75249

Vancouver

Kim M, Song J. A Confirmatory Structural Equation Model of Achievement Estimated by Dichotomous Attitudes, Interest, and Conceptual Understanding. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(4):271-85. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75249

AMA

Kim M, Song J. A Confirmatory Structural Equation Model of Achievement Estimated by Dichotomous Attitudes, Interest, and Conceptual Understanding. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(4), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75249

Chicago

Kim, Minkee, and Jinwoong Song. "A Confirmatory Structural Equation Model of Achievement Estimated by Dichotomous Attitudes, Interest, and Conceptual Understanding". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2010 6 no. 4 (2010): 271-285. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75249

Harvard

Kim, M., and Song, J. (2010). A Confirmatory Structural Equation Model of Achievement Estimated by Dichotomous Attitudes, Interest, and Conceptual Understanding. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(4), pp. 271-285. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75249

MLA

Kim, Minkee et al. "A Confirmatory Structural Equation Model of Achievement Estimated by Dichotomous Attitudes, Interest, and Conceptual Understanding". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 6, no. 4, 2010, pp. 271-285. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75249