Argumentation of Prospective Mathematics Teachers in Fraction Tasks Mediated by an Online Assessment System With Automatic Feedback
Jorge Gaona 1 * , Romina Menares 2
More Detail
1 Centro de Estudios Avanzados, Universidad de Playa Ancha, CHILE2 Instituto de Matemáticas, Universidad de Valparaíso, CHILE* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This article reports the argumentation work of a group of trainee mathematics teachers in an experiment carried out in a virtual class (due to the emergence of COVID-19) during 2020. They worked with a task on fractions in an online assessment system with questions with random parameters and infinite possible correct answers. This was followed by a discussion of the strategies and the justifications, arguments and validations of these strategies and other conjectures that emerged. This article analyzes this work from a qualitative approach using the Mathematical Working Space as a theoretical framework. The results show that the discussion work led the trainee teachers to find interpretations for the algorithms processed by the computer, enhancing epistemic discourse and argumentation in the context of the use of technological artifacts. In turn, the same discourses allowed the future teachers to instrumentalize the processes to be used in new tasks.

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2021, Volume 17, Issue 12, Article No: em2055

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11425

Publication date: 17 Dec 2021

Article Views: 616

Article Downloads: 369

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article