Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 505-518). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_39
• Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc14_051_08_10
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. BSCS.
• Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
• Dang, V. E. (2024). Current status of ChatGPT use in students’ learning and research activities. Vietnam Journal of Education.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 18.0 update (11th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
• Holmes, W., Miao, F., Viéville, T., & Gaffney, C. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence and the future of education. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385877
• Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818
• Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.
• Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? Opportunities and challenges of large language models in education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
• Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research, theory, and practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
• Nguyen, N. Q. T., Tran, N. M., Vu, H. T., Tran, L. T., & Nguyen, H. V. T., Bui, T. T., & Nguyen, T. T. (2025). Evaluating the feasibility of using generative AI for educational research within the context of Vietnam’s 2018 general education curriculum. Vietnam Journal of Education, 9(2), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2025.481
• NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
• OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics, financial literacy, and collaborative problem solving. OECD Publications. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
• Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
• Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2025). Generative AI and educational transformation: Emerging trends and future directions. Smart Learning Environment.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
• Xuan, S. H., Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, T., Nguyen, L., Nguyen, H., Pham, N., Phung, T., Ngo, B., Nguyen, V., Nguyen, M., Tran, T., Le, T., Nguyen, K., & FNU, P. (2025). Evaluating the impact of generative AI on mathematics education: A comparative study in Vietnamese high schools. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/8886206
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2024). Systematic review of artificial intelligence applications in higher education and implications for future research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15430421TIP4102_2

APA

Le, N. C., Nguyen, H. T., Nguyen, Q. T. T., Nguyen, L. P. H., Tran, T. V., Tran, T. A., Pham, Q. V., & Nguyen, G. T. (2026). ChatGPT as cognitive scaffolding in 5E-based science instruction: Effects on middle school students’ problem-solving competence. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(8), em2886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19030

Vancouver

Le NC, Nguyen HT, Nguyen QTT, Nguyen LPH, Tran TV, Tran TA, et al. ChatGPT as cognitive scaffolding in 5E-based science instruction: Effects on middle school students’ problem-solving competence. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(8):em2886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19030

AMA

Le NC, Nguyen HT, Nguyen QTT, et al. ChatGPT as cognitive scaffolding in 5E-based science instruction: Effects on middle school students’ problem-solving competence. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(8), em2886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19030

Chicago

Le, Nguyen Chi, Ha Thi Nguyen, Quynh Thi Thuy Nguyen, Lan Phu Hoang Nguyen, The Van Tran, Tu Anh Tran, Quynh Viet Pham, and Giang Thi Nguyen. "ChatGPT as cognitive scaffolding in 5E-based science instruction: Effects on middle school students’ problem-solving competence". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 8 (2026): em2886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19030

Harvard

Le, N. C., Nguyen, H. T., Nguyen, Q. T. T., Nguyen, L. P. H., Tran, T. V., Tran, T. A., . . . Nguyen, G. T. (2026). ChatGPT as cognitive scaffolding in 5E-based science instruction: Effects on middle school students’ problem-solving competence. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(8), em2886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19030

MLA

Le, Nguyen Chi et al. "ChatGPT as cognitive scaffolding in 5E-based science instruction: Effects on middle school students’ problem-solving competence". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 8, 2026, em2886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19030