Development and Factor Analysis
of an Instrument to Measure
Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of
Learning Objects

Sami Şahin

doi:10.12973/ejmste/75247

Development and Factor Analysis of an Instrument to Measure Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning Objects

Full Text (PDF)

Sami Şahin ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to measure student teachers’ perception of digital learning objects. The participants included 308 voluntary senior students attending courses in a college of education of a public university in Turkey. The items were extracted to their related factors by the principal axis factoring method. The results showed a 3 factor solution: Perceived Educational Merit, Perceived Use and Development in the Class, and Perceived Accessibility. Descriptive results revealed that preservice teachers think learning objects are easy to develop, use, and access; have an educational value; and are useful in teaching and learning. Replications with different samples are recommended to enhance and validate the questionnaire. Similar studies are also recommended to reveal innovative uses of learning objects in teacher education.

Keywords

questionnaire development
learning objects
teacher education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2010, Volume 6, Issue 4, 253-261

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75247

Publication date: 22 Dec 2010

Article Views: 1398

Article Downloads: 841

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Beichner, R. J. (1993). Technology competencies for new teachers: Issues and suggestions. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 11(2), 17-20.
Bullock, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: an examination of the factors that pre-service teachers encounter as they attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2, 211-237.
Chrysostomou, C. & Papadopoulos, G. (2008). Towards an object-oriented model for the design and development of learning objects. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 219-243.
Cifuentes, L. (1997). From sages to guides: A professional development study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5(1), 67-77.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Elliott, K. & Sweeney, K. (2008). Quantifying the reuse of learning objects. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 137-142.
Fabry, D. & Higgs, J. (1997). Barriers to the effective use of technology in education. Journal of Educational Computing, 17(4), 385-395.
Francis, David E. & Murphy, E. (2008). Instructional designers’ conceptualisations of learning objects. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 475- 486.
Johnson, J. A. & Wichern, D. W. (1998). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (4th Ed.), New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Kay, R. H., Knaack, L. & Petrarca, D. (2009). Exploring teachers perceptions of web-based learning tools. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5, 27-50.
Kay R. H. & and Knaack, L. (2008). A multi-component model for assessing learning objects: The learning object evaluation metric (LOEM). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(5), 574-591.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
Kent, T. W. & McNergney, R. F. (1999). Will Technology Really Change Education? From Blackboard to Web. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Kerr, S. T. (1996). Visions of sugar plums: The future of technology, education, and the schools. In S. T. Kerr (Ed.), Technology and the future of schooling: Ninety-Fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp 1-27). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Kersaint, G., Horton, B., Stohl, H. & Garofalo, J. (2003). Technology beliefs and practices of mathematics education faculty. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 4, 549-577.
Manea, N. & Rutledge, D. (2008). Teachers’ attitudes and perceptions toward learning objects-based. In K. McFerrin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 2095-2102). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Maniar, N., Garrison, W., Simms, C. & Bennett, E. (2007). Educators’ perceptions of learning object brokerage. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 2900-2905). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
McCannon, M. & Crews, T. B. (2000). Assessing the technology training needs of elementary school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 111-21.
McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2001). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (5th Ed.), New York, NY: Longman.
Mertler, C. A. & Vannata, R. A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation advanced and multivariate statistical methods (2nd Ed.), Pyrczak Publishing.
Morehead, P. & LaBeau, B. (2005). The continuing challenges of technology integration for teachers. Essays in Education, 15.
Pellegrino, J. W. & Altman, J. E. (1997). Information technology and teacher preparation: Some critical issues and illustrative solutions. Information Technology and Teacher Preparation, 72(1), 89-121.
Recesso, A., Wiles, D., Venn, M., Campbell, W.A. & Padilla, M. (2002). Teacher induction and technology integration: Is there a critical element missing in existing induction models? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 467502).
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.), New York, NY: The Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach, New York, NY: The Free Press.
Schrum, L. (1999). Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 83-90.
Lau, S. H. & Woods, P.C. (2008). An investigation of user perceptions and attitudes towards learning objects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 685-699.
Strudler, N. & Wetzel, K. (1999). Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: factors affecting technology integration in pre-service programs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 63-81.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd Ed.), New York: Harper Collins.
Watson, D. M. (1998). Blame the technocentric artifact! What research tells us about problems inhibiting teacher use of IT. In G. Marshall & M. Ruohonen (Eds), Capacity building for IT in education in developing countries, (pp. 185- 192). London.
Weller M. (2004). Learning objects and the e-learning cost dilemma. Open Learning, 19(3), 293-302.
Wiley, D. A. (2000). Learning object design and sequencing theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University.
Woodrow, J. E. (1992). The influence of programming training on the computer literacy and attitudes of preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 2, 200-219.

How to cite this article

APA

Şahin, S. (2010). Development and Factor Analysis of an Instrument to Measure Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning Objects. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(4), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75247

Vancouver

Şahin S. Development and Factor Analysis of an Instrument to Measure Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning Objects. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(4):253-61. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75247

AMA

Şahin S. Development and Factor Analysis of an Instrument to Measure Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning Objects. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(4), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75247

Chicago

Şahin, Sami. "Development and Factor Analysis of an Instrument to Measure Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning Objects". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2010 6 no. 4 (2010): 253-261. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75247

Harvard

Şahin, S. (2010). Development and Factor Analysis of an Instrument to Measure Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning Objects. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(4), pp. 253-261. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75247

MLA

Şahin, Sami "Development and Factor Analysis of an Instrument to Measure Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning Objects". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 6, no. 4, 2010, pp. 253-261. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75247