• Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Hofstein, A., et al. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
• Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2018). Teaching practices linked to the implementation of inquiry-based practical work in certain science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56, 64-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21469
• Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
• Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26-29.
• Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B. K. S., & Tibell, L. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145738
• Blanchard, M., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accontability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94(4), 577-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20390
• Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146-170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260
• Blazek, R., & Prihodova, S. (2016). Mezinarodni setreni PISA 2015: Narodni zprava - prirodovedna gramotnost [PISA 2015: National report - scientific literacy]. Prague: Czech School Inspectorate.
• Blazek, R., Janotova, Z., Poztuznikova, E., & Basl, J. (2019). Mezinarodni setreni PISA 2018. Narodni zprava [PISA 2018: National report]. Prague: Czech School Inspectorate.
• Boudova, S., Stastny, V., Basl, J., Zatloukal, T., Andrys, O., & Prazakova, D. (2020). Mezinarodni setreni TALIS 2018. Narodni zprava [TALIS 2018: National report]. Prague: Czech School Inspectorate.
• Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In: K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Bruder, R., & Prescott, A. (2013). Research evidence on the benefits of IBL. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 811-822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0542-2
• Buck, B. L., Bretz, S. L., & Towns, M. H. (2008). Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(1), 52-58.
• Chall, J. S. (2000). The academic achievement challenge. New York: Guilford.
• Chang, C.-Y., & Mao, S.-L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597617
• Chraska, M. (2011). Metody pedagogickeho vyzkumu: Zaklady kvantitativniho vyzkumu [Methods of pedagogical research: Foundations of qualitative research]. Prague: Grada.
• Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Applegate, B., Skjold, B., Undreiu, A., Loving, C. C., & Gobert, J. D. (2010). Experimental comparison of inquiry and direct instruction in science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140903513599
• Dolin, J., & Evans, R. (2018). Transforming Assessment: Through an Interplay Between Practice, Research and Policy. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3
• Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory teaching styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 543-547. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p543
• Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(12), 2887-2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a
• Dylevsky, I., Stastny, F., & Trojan, S. (1984). Prakticka cviceni ze somatologie [Practical laboratory works from somatology]. Prague: Avicenum.
• Eastwell, P. (2009). Inquiry learning: Elements of confusion and frustration. The American Biology Teacher, 71(5), 263-264. https://doi.org/10.1662/005.071.0503
• Eurydice (2011). Science education in Europe: National practices, policies and research. Brussels: European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2797/7170
• Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers Inhibiting Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Potential Solutions: Perceptions of Positively Inclined Early Adopters. Research in Science Education, 49, 543-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5
• Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90(3), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20130
• Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82, 300-329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
• García-Carmona, A. (2019). Pre-service Primary Science Teachers’ Abilities for Solving a Measurement Problem Through Inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9858-7
• García-Carmona, A. (2020). From Inquiry-Based Science Education to the Approach Based on Scientific Practices. Science & Education, 29, 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00108-8
• García-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2018). Prospective primary teachers’ prior experiences, conceptions, and pedagogical valuations of experimental activities in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9773-3
• Gibson, H. L. (1998, April). Case studies of an inquiry-based science programs’ impact on students’ attitudes towards science and interest in science careers. Paper presented at annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 19. - 22. 4. 1998, San Diego, CA.
• Hazelkorn, E., Ryan, C., Beernaert, Y., Constantinou, C., Deca, L., Grangeat, M., … Welzel-Breuer, M. (2015). Science education for Responsible Citizenship (No. EUR 26893). Brussels: European Commission - Research and Innovation.
• Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
• Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9038-y
• Khishfe, R., & Abd-Al-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
• Kim, M., Tan, A-L., & Talaue, F. (2013). New vision and challenges in inquiry-based curriculum change in Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 289-311. https://doi.org/0.1080/09500693.2011.636844
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
• Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x
• Lederman, N. G., Abell, S., & Akerson, V. (2008). Students’ knowledge and skills with inquiry. In E. Abrams, S. A. Southerland & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the classroom: Realities and opportunities (3-38). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
• Levy, A. J., Minner, D. D., & Jablonski, E. S. (2007, April). Inquiry-based science instruction and students’ science content knowledge: A research synthesis. Paper presented at annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 15. - 18. 4. 2007, New Orleans, LA, USA.
• Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610393
• Llewellyn, D. (2011). Differentiated Science Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Lord, T., & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. The American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342-345. https://doi.org/10.2307/4452009
• Mattheis, F. E., & Nakayama, G. (1988). Effects of a laboratory-centered inquiry program on laboratory skills, science process skills, and understanding of science knowledge in middle grades students [online, cit. 4. 7. 2019]. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED307148.pdf
• Matthews, K. E., Adams, P., & Goos, M. (2010). Using the principles of BIO2010 to develop an introductory, interdisciplinary course for biology students. CBE-Life Science Education, 9, 290-297. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-03-0034
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction - What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
• Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load in novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, 32, 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021811.66966.1d
• NIE (2007). Ramcovy vzdělávací program pr ogymnazia [Framework Education Programme for grammar schools]. Prague: National Institute for Education.
• NIE (2017). Ramcovy vzdělávací program pro zakladni vzdelavani [Framework Education Programme for Elementary Education]. Prague: National Institute for Education.
• OECD (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework. Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en
• OECD (2020). PISA 2024: Strategic Vision and Direction for Science (Final draft) [online, cit. 16. 6. 2020]. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA-2024-Science-Strategic-Vision-Proposal.pdf
• Osborne, J. F., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections [cit. 4. 7. 2019]. https://doi.org/10.2777/12626
• Papacek, M., Cizkova, V., Kubiatko, M., Petr, J., & Zavodska, R. (2015). Didaktika biologie: didaktika v rekonstrukci [Biology Didactics: didactics in reconstruction]. In I. Stuchlikova & T. Janik (Eds.), Oborove didaktiky: vyvoj - stav - perspektivy (225-257). Brno: Masaryk University.
• Radvanova, S. (2017). Efektivita vybranych vzdelavacich postupu ve vyuce biologie [The efficiency of selected educational practices in biology teaching]. PhD thesis. Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Education.
• Ramnarain, U. (2018). Scientific literacy in East Asia: Shifting toward an inquiry-informed learning perspective. In Primary science education in East Asia (pp. 201-213). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97167-4_10
• Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Wahlberg-Henrikson, H., & Hermmo, U. (2007). Science education NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
• Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground-A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
• Russell, C. B., & Weaver, G. C. (2008). Student perceptions of the purpose and function of the laboratory in science: A grounded theory study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020209
• Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137-1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20310
• Schlatter, E., Molenaar, I., & Lazonder, A. W. (2020) Individual Differences in Children’s Development of Scientific Reasoning Through Inquiry-Based Instruction: Who Needs Additional Guidance? Frontiers in Psychology, 11(904), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00904
• Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 410-422. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10029
• Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T.-Y., & Lee, Y.-H. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1436-1460. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20212
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., Khishfe, R., Lederman, J. S., Matthews, L., & Liu, S. (2002, January). Explicit-reflective instructional attention to nature of science and scientific inquiry: Impact on student learning. Paper presented at annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, 10. - 13. 1. 2002. Charlotte, NC, USA.
• Sjøberg, S. (2018). The power and paradoxes of PISA: Should Inquiry-Based Science Education be sacrificed to climb on the ranking? NorDiNa, 14(2), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.6185
• Skoda, J., & Doulik, P. (2009). Vyvoj paradigmat prirodovedneho vzdelavani [Science paradigms development]. Pedagogicka orientace, 19(3), 24-44.
• Smith, A. (1995). The Usborne big book of experiments. London: Usborne Publishing Ltd.
• Tsivitanidou, O.E., Gray, P., Rybska, E., Louca, L., & Constantinou, C.P. et al. (2018). Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91406-0
• Vacha, Z., & Rokos, L. (2017). Integrated Science and Biology Education as Viewed by Czech University Students and their Attitude to Inquiry-Based Scientific Education. The New Educational Review, 47(1), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.47.1.19
• Vohra, F. C. (2000). Changing trends in biological education: An international perspective. Biology International, 39, 49-55.
• Vorholzer, A., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2019). Guidance in inquiry-based instruction - an attempt to disentangle a manifold construct. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1562-1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1616124

APA

Rokos, L., & Zavodska, R. (2020). Efficacy of Inquiry-Based and “Cookbook” Labs at Human Physiology Lessons at University Level - Is There an Impact in Relation to Acquirement of New Knowledge and Skills?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1909. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9124

Vancouver

Rokos L, Zavodska R. Efficacy of Inquiry-Based and “Cookbook” Labs at Human Physiology Lessons at University Level - Is There an Impact in Relation to Acquirement of New Knowledge and Skills?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12):em1909. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9124

AMA

Rokos L, Zavodska R. Efficacy of Inquiry-Based and “Cookbook” Labs at Human Physiology Lessons at University Level - Is There an Impact in Relation to Acquirement of New Knowledge and Skills?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12), em1909. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9124

Chicago

Rokos, Lukas, and Radka Zavodska. "Efficacy of Inquiry-Based and “Cookbook” Labs at Human Physiology Lessons at University Level - Is There an Impact in Relation to Acquirement of New Knowledge and Skills?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 12 (2020): em1909. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9124

Harvard

Rokos, L., and Zavodska, R. (2020). Efficacy of Inquiry-Based and “Cookbook” Labs at Human Physiology Lessons at University Level - Is There an Impact in Relation to Acquirement of New Knowledge and Skills?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1909. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9124

MLA

Rokos, Lukas et al. "Efficacy of Inquiry-Based and “Cookbook” Labs at Human Physiology Lessons at University Level - Is There an Impact in Relation to Acquirement of New Knowledge and Skills?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 12, 2020, em1909. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9124