• Alkhawaldeh, S. A., & Olaimat, M. (2010). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to eleventh-grade students’ understanding of cellular respiration concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 115–125. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18010.x
• Baser, M. (2006). Fostering conceptual change by cognitive conflict instruction on students’ understanding of heat and temperature concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 96-144.
• Beerenwinkel, A., Parchmann, I., & Gräsel, C. (2011). Conceptual change texts in chemistry teaching: A study on particle model of matter. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1235-1259. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9257-9
• Beeth, M. (1998). Facilitating conceptual change learning: The need for teachers to support metacognition. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(1), 49-61. doi:10.1023/A:1009417622756
• Çalik, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Investigating the effectiveness of an analogy activity in improving students' conceptual change for solution chemistry concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 651-676. doi:10.1007/s10763-008- 9136-9
• Caravita, S., & Hallden, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 89-111. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90020-5
• Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107-123. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098- 2736(199702)34:23.0.CO;2-X
• Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27-43. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
• Chiu, M. H., Lin, J. W. & Chou, C. C. (2016). Impacts of citations on conceptual change articles between1982 and 2011: From international and regional perspectives. In M. H. Chiu, (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia: Challenges and Opportunities (pp.89-123). Netherlands: Springer.
• Clement, J. (2008). The role of explanatory models in teaching conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 417- 452). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Colker, L. J. (2000). “Reminiscences from the field: The continuing story of ERIC.” Available from http://eric.ed.gov (ED437937)
• Diakidoy, I-A., Vosniadou, S., & Hawks, J. D. (1997). Conceptual change in astronomy: Models of the earth and of the day/night cycle in American-Indian children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(2), 159-184. doi:10.1007/BF03173083
• diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10 (2-3), 105-225. doi:10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
• diSessa, A. A. (2008). A birds-eye view of the “pieces” vs. “coherence” controversy (from the “pieces” side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 35-60). New York, NY: Routledge.
• diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155-1191. doi:10.1080/0950069980201002
• Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC). (n.d.). About the ERIC program. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/resources/html/about/about_eric.html
• Eryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students’ misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1001-1015. doi:10.1002/tea.10054
• Franke, G., & Bogner, F. X. (2011). Conceptual change in students’ molecular biology education: Tilting at windmills? Journal of Educational Research, 104(1), 7-18. doi:10.1080/00220670903431165
• Hobson, S. M., Trundle, K. C., & Sackes, M. (2010). Using a planetarium software program to promote conceptual change with young children. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 165-176. doi:10.1007/s10956-009-9189-8
• Howland, J. L., Howell, S., Wright, T. C., & Dickson, C. (2009). Google Scholar and the continuing education literature. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 57(1), 35- 39.
• Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 71-93. doi:10.1002/tea.20386
• Jensen, M. S,. & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79(2), 147-166. doi:10.1002/sce.3730790203
• Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 542-558). New York, NY: Macmillan.
• Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 71-96. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3
• Keselman, A. Kaufman, D. R., Kramer, S., & Patel, V. L. (2007). Fostering conceptual change and critical reasoning about HIV and AIDS. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 844-863. doi:10.1002/tea.20173
• Kulkarni, A. V., Aziz, B., Shams, I., and Busse, J. W. (2009). Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(10), 1092-1096..
• Lawson, A. E., & Thompson, L. D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 733–746. doi:10.1002/tea.3660250904
• Lee, G., & Byun, T. (2012). An explanation for the difficulty of leading conceptual change using a counterintuitive demonstration: The relationship between cognitive conflict and responses. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 943-965. doi:10.1007/s11165- 011-9234-5
• Lee, M. H., Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999-2020.
• Li, S. C., Law, N., & Lui, K. F. A. (2006). Cognitive perturbation through dynamic modelling: A pedagogical approach to conceptual change in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(6), 405-422. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00187.x
• Liao, Y. W., & She, H. C. (2009). Enhancing eight grade students’ scientific conceptual change and scientific reasoning through a web-based learning program. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 228-240.
• Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 357-380. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
• Liu, X-F. (2004). Using concept mapping for assessing and promoting relational conceptual change in science. Science Education, 88(3), 373-396. doi:10.1002/sce.10127
• Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Zurlo, G. (2006). Epistemological understanding in different judgment domains: Relationships with gender, grade level, and curriculum. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(1-2), 43-56. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.08.003
• Muller, D. A., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2008). Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 92(2), 278-296. doi:10.1002/sce.20244
• National Research Council. (2001). Educating teachers of science, mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• Niaz, M. (1995). Cognitive conflict as a teaching strategy in solving chemistry problems: A dialectic-constructivist perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 959- 970. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320907
• Palmer, D. H. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 87(5), 663-684. doi:10.1002/sce.1056
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond “cold” conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199. doi:10.3102/00346543063002167
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
• Sinatra, M. G., & Pintrich R. P. (2003). The role of intentions in conceptual change learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 1-18). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). New York, NY: State University of New York.
• Tabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1999). Idea and action: Action research and the development of conceptual change teaching of science. Science Education, 83(3), 309-322. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199905)83:33.0.CO;2-1
• Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. The Netherlands: Springer.
• Taber, K. S. (2011). Understanding the nature and processes of conceptual change: An essay review. Education Review, 14(1), 1-17.
• Taylor, A. K., & Kowalski, P. (2004). Naïve psychological science: The prevalence, strength, and sources of misconceptions. The Psychological Record, 54(1), 15-25.
• Thorley, N. R., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Conflict within dyadic interactions as a stimulant for conceptual change in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 9(2), 203–216. doi:10.1080/0950069870090209
• Tiberghien, A. (1994). Modelling as a basis for analyzing teaching-learning situations. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 71-87. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90019-1
• Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 951- 970. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
• Tsai, C. C., & Wen, L. M. (2005). Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: A content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 3–14.
• Tsaparlis, G., & Papaphotis, G. (2009). High-school students’ conceptual difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 895-930. doi:10.1080/09500690801891908
• Twigger, D., Byard, M., Draper, S., Driver, R., Hartley, R., Hennessy, S., … & Scanlon, E. (1991). The ‘conceptual change in science’ project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 144-155. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00238.x
• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
• Vosniadou, S. (2008). Conceptual change research: An introduction. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. xiii-xxviii). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Windschitl, M. (1997). Student epistemological beliefs and conceptual change activities: How do pair members affect each other? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(1), 37- 47. doi:10.1023/A:1022516901783
• Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145-160. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098- 2736(199802)35:23.0.CO;2-S
• Yenilmez, A., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Enhancing students’ understanding of photosynthesis and respiration in plant through conceptual change approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 81-87. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-0358-8
• Yilmaz, D., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2011). The comparative effects of prediction/discussionbased learning cycle, conceptual change text, and traditional instructions on student understanding of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 607-628. doi:10.1080/09500691003657758

APA

Lin, J.-W., Yen, M.-H., Liang, J., Chiu, M.-H., & Guo, C.-J. (2016). Examining the Factors That Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2617-2646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a

Vancouver

Lin JW, Yen MH, Liang J, Chiu MH, Guo CJ. Examining the Factors That Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(9):2617-46. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a

AMA

Lin JW, Yen MH, Liang J, Chiu MH, Guo CJ. Examining the Factors That Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(9), 2617-2646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a

Chicago

Lin, Jing-Wen, Miao-Hsuan Yen, Jiachi Liang, Mei-Hung Chiu, and Chorng-Jee Guo. "Examining the Factors That Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 9 (2016): 2617-2646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a

Harvard

Lin, J.-W., Yen, M.-H., Liang, J., Chiu, M.-H., and Guo, C.-J. (2016). Examining the Factors That Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), pp. 2617-2646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a

MLA

Lin, Jing-Wen et al. "Examining the Factors That Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 9, 2016, pp. 2617-2646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a