Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT into educational settings has sparked a paradigm shift in higher education, necessitating a deeper understanding of students’ attitudes toward these technologies. The ABC model, which delineates attitudes into affective, behavioral, and cognitive components, provides a robust framework for such investigations. Prior studies have applied this model broadly across multiple disciplines. However, little is known about its applicability in physics education, where a strong emphasis on analytical reasoning and quantitative problem-solving might influence attitudes uniquely. Addressing this gap, we conducted a cross-sectional survey study using an online questionnaire administered to N = 1,189 physics students enrolled at German universities. We developed an instrument, adapted from prior research, to assess students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT in the context of physics learning. The validity of the instrument’s hypothesized three-factor structure was then evaluated via confirmatory factor analysis. The results paint a clear picture: The three-factor solution demonstrated satisfactory global fit (CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.04) and significantly outperformed alternative two- and one-factor models based on likelihood ratio tests and information criteria. The results thus affirm the empirical validity of this instrument in capturing physics students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT according to the ABC model, contributing to a nuanced understanding of learner perspectives on ChatGPT in discipline-specific educational contexts. Additionally, an overview is provided of physics students’ attitudes toward learning with ChatGPT by analyzing their responses on the item level. Implications for educational practice and future research are discussed.
Keywords
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 22, Issue 2, February 2026, Article No: em2770
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17822
Publication date: 02 Feb 2026
Article Views: 83
Article Downloads: 42
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- Abdaljaleel, M., Barakat, M., Alsanafi, M., Salim, N. A., Abazid, H., Malaeb, D., Mohammed, A. H., Hassan, B. A. R., Wayyes, A. M., Farhan, S. S., El Khatib, S., Rahal, M., Sahban, A., Abdelaziz, D. H., Mansour, N. O., AlZayer, R., Khalil, R., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Hallit, R., … Sallam, M. (2024). A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 1983. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52549-8
- Abdulayeva, A., Zhanatbekova, N., Andasbayev, Y., & Boribekova, F. (2025). Fostering AI literacy in pre-service physics teachers: Inputs from training and co-variables. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1505420
- Abrahamson, A. C., Baker, L. A., & Caspi, A. (2002). Rebellious teens? genetic and environmental influences on the social attitudes of adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1392-1408. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1392
- Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Arbulu Perez Vargas, C. G., Orellana Ulloa, M. N., Gutiérrez Ulloa, C. R., Pizarro Romero, J. M., Gutiérrez Jaramillo, N. D., Cuenca Orellana, H. U., Ayala Anzoátegui, D. X., & López Roca, C. (2024a). Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation z university students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4
- Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Vargas, C. G. A. P., Jordan, O. H., Ballesteros, M. A. A., & Morales, A. E. P. (2024b). Exploring attitudes toward ChatGPT among college students: An empirical analysis of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components using path analysis. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100320
- Agyare, B., Asare, J., Kraishan, A., Nkrumah, I., & Adjekum, D. K. (2025). A cross-national assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot user perceptions in collegiate physics education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100365
- Ahadi, N., Zanjanab, A. G., Sorooshian, S., Monametsi, G., Virutamasen, P., Wongpreedee, K., Deebhijarn, S., & Taghipour, A. (2023). The outlook of ChatGPT, an AI-based tool adoption in academia: Applications, challenges, and opportunities. In Proceedings of the TENCON 2023-2023 IEEE Region 10 Conference (pp. 15-20). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON58879.2023.10322527
- Ahadzadeh, A. S., Wu, S. L., & Sijia, X. (2024). Exploring academic intentions for ChatGPT: A perspective from the theory of planned behavior. CMU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 11(2), Article e2024016. https://doi.org/10.12982/CMUJASR.2024.016
- Ahmad, S. Y. B., Hussain, N. S., Ulul’Azmi, F. F., Ismadi, N. N. B., Fauzi, N. F. E. M., & Razali, N. (2024). Feelings, attitudes, and knowledge in the learning method using ChatGPT among students in higher education institutions. Jurnal Audiens, 5(3), 488-498. https://doi.org/10.18196/jas.v5i3.476
- Ahmed, R. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT usage in higher education: Patterns, perceptions, and ethical implications among university students. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 3(6), 1122-1131. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v3i6.363
- Ajlouni, A. O., Wahba, F. A.-A., & Almahaireh, A. S. (2023). Students’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT as a learning tool: The case of the university of Jordan. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(18), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i18.41753
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- Al Darayseh, A., & Mersin, N. (2025). Integrating generative AI into stem education: Insights from science and mathematics teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(3), Article em0832. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16232
- Al-Jahwari, M., & Yousif, M. J. (2024). The impact of AI tools on education: ChatGPT in focus. Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Development Journal, 4(4), 314-336. https://doi.org/10.52098/airdj.20244430
- Almulla, M., & Ali, S. I. (2024). The changing educational landscape for sustainable online experiences: Implications of ChatGPT in Arab students’ learning experience. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(9), 285-306. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.15
- Anwar, F., Hosawi, S. B. I., Al-Abbasi, F. A., & Asar, T. O. (2024). Scientific writing–ChatGPT versus real-time output: Addressing academician’s concern. Current Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), Article e260124226404. https://doi.org/10.2174/0129503752269069231213045450
- Biagini, G. (2025). Towards an AI-literate future: A systematic literature review exploring education, ethics, and applications. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 2616-2666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00466-w
- Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), Article ep430. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13176
- Bitzenbauer, P., & Ubben, M. S. (2025). The structure of learners’ perceptions of models (not only) in quantum physics: spotlight on Fidelity of Gestalt and Functional Fidelity. EPJ Quantum Technology, 12(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00316-7
- Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1191-1205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191
- Bukar, U. A., Sayeed, M. S., Razak, S. F. A., Yogarayan, S., & Sneesl, R. (2024). Decision-making framework for the utilization of generative artificial intelligence in education: A case study of ChatGPT. IEEE Access, 12, 95368-95389. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3425172
- Buzick, H. M. (2010). Testing for heterogeneous factor loadings using mixtures of confirmatory factor analysis models. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00165
- Chakrabarti, A., & Ghosh, J. K. (2011). AIC, BIC and recent advances in model selection. In P. S. Bandyopadhyay, & M. R. Forster (Eds.), Philosophy of statistics (pp. 583-605). North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51862-0.50018-6
- Chen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-L. (2024). Effectiveness of AI-assisted game-based learning on science learning outcomes, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and learning behavior. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 18621-18642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12553-x
- Coban, A., Dzsotjan, D., Küchemann, S., Durst, J., Kuhn, J., & Hoyer, C. (2025). AI support meets AR visualization for Alice and Bob: Personalized learning based on individual ChatGPT feedback in an AR quantum cryptography experiment for physics lab courses. EPJ Quantum Technology, 12, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00310-z
- Daepp, M. I. G., & Counts, S. (2025). The emerging generative artificial intelligence divide in the united states. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 443-456). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35825
- Ding, L., Li, T., Jiang, S., & Gapud, A. (2023). Students’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00434-1
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582
- Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1974). Genetics and the development of social attitudes. Nature, 249(5454), 288-289. https://doi.org/10.1038/249288a0
- El Fathi, T., Saad, A., Larhzil, H., Lamri, D., & Al Ibrahimi, E. M. (2025). Integrating generative AI into stem education: Enhancing conceptual understanding, addressing misconceptions, and assessing student acceptance. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00125-z
- Elhassan, S. E., Sajid, M. R., Syed, A. M., Fathima, S. A., Khan, B. S., & Tamim, H. (2025). Assessing familiarity, usage patterns, and attitudes of medical students toward ChatGPT and other chat-based AI apps in medical education: Cross-sectional questionnaire study. JMIR Medical Education, 11, Article e63065. https://doi.org/10.2196/63065
- Estrada-Araoz, E. G., Paredes-Valverde, Y., Quispe-Herrera, R., Gallegos-Ramos, N., Rivera-Mamani, F., & Romaní-Claros, A. (2024). Investigating the attitude of university students towards the use of ChatGPT as a learning resource. Data Metadata, 3, Article 268. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024268
- Fadillah, M. A., Usmeldi, U., Lufri, L., Mawardi, M., & Festiyed, F. (2024). Exploring user perceptions: The impact of ChatGPT on high school students’ physics understanding and learning. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(2), 1197-1207. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.013
- Fajt, B., & Schiller, E. (2025). ChatGPT in academia: University students’ attitudes towards the use of ChatGPT and plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 1363-1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09603-5
- Farinosi, M., & Melchior, C. (2025). ‘I use ChatGPT, but should I?’ A multi-method analysis of students’ practices and attitudes towards AI in higher education. European Journal of Education, 60(2), Article e70094. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70094
- Fontao, C. B., Santos, M. L., & Lozano, A. (2024). ChatGPT’s role in the education system: Insights from the future secondary teachers. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(8), 1035-1043. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJIET.2024.14.8.2131
- Forero, M. G., & Herrera-Suárez, H. J. (2023). ChatGPT in the classroom: Boon or bane for physics students’ academic performance? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.02422
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(4), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
- Gregorcic, B., & Pendrill, A.-M. (2023). ChatGPT and the frustrated Socrates. Physics Education, 58(3), Article 035021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acc299
- Groothuijsen, S., Van den Beemt, A., Remmers, J., & Leeuwen, L. (2024). AI chatbots in programming education: Students’ use in a scientific computing course and consequences for learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100290
- Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2023). Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(11), 2599-2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181
- Hatemi, P. K. (2013). The influence of major life events on economic attitudes in a world of gene-environment interplay. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 987-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12037
- Horchani, R. (2025). ChatGPT’s problem-solving abilities in context-rich and traditional physics problems. Physics Education, 60(2), Article 025019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad2162
- İpek, Z. H., Gözüm, A. I. C., Papadakis, S., & Kallogiannakis, M. (2023). Educational applications of the ChatGPT AI system: A systematic review research. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(3), 26-55. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.123.2
- Jackson, D., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
- Kacperski, C., Ulloa, R., Bonnay, D., Kulshrestha, J., Selb, P., & Spitz, A. (2025). Characteristics of ChatGPT users from Germany: Implications for the digital divide from web tracking data. PLoS ONE, 20(1), Article e0309047. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309047
- Kandler, C., Bell, E., Shikishima, C., Yamagata, S., & Riemann, R. (2014). The genetic foundations of attitude formation: The case of left-right political orientations. In R. A. Scott, & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: Interdisciplinary directions (pp. 1-24). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0144
- Kieser, F., Wulff, P., Kuhn, J., & Küchemann, S. (2023). Educational data augmentation in physics education research using ChatGPT. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19, Article 020150. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020150
- Kim, Y. J., Chun, J. U., & Song, J. (2009). Investigating the role of attitude in technology acceptance from an attitude strength perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 29(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.011
- Kline, R. B. (1998). Measurement models and confirmatory factor analysis. In D. A. Kenny, & D. L. Todd (Eds.), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (pp. 189-243). Guilford Press.
- Köhler, C., & Hartig, J. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: Measurement instruments to assess student knowledge, usage, and attitude. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), Article ep528. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/15144
- Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Correcting students’ misconceptions in physics using experiments designed by ChatGPT. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(2), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(2).07
- Kotsis, K. T. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the scientific process: A review of ChatGPT’s role to foster experimental thinking in physics education. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 3(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2025.3(3).14
- Kregear, T., Babayeva, M., & Widenhorn, R. (2025). Analysis of student interactions with a large language model in an introductory physics lab setting. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00489-3
- Krupp, L., Steinert, S., Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, M., Avila, K., Lukowicz, P., Kuhn, J., Küchemann, S., & Karolus, J. (2023). Unreflected acceptance–Investigating the negative consequences of ChatGPT-assisted problem solving in physics education. In Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (pp. 199-212). https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240195
- Kubullek, A.-K., Kumaç, N., & Dogangün, A. (2024). Understanding the adoption of ChatGPT in higher education: A comparative study with insights from stem and business students. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2024 (pp. 684-689). https://doi.org/10.1145/3670653.3677507
- Leon, C., Lipuma, J., & Oviedo-Torres, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence in stem education: A transdisciplinary framework for engagement and innovation. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1619888
- Liang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, H., Wang, F., & Sun, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT in physics education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7
- Marengo, A., Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., & Ceylan, M. (2025). Development and validation of generative artificial intelligence attitude scale for students. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1528455
- Mariñas, K. A., Saflor, C. S., Alvarado, P., Uminga, J. M., & Verde, N. A. (2025). Assessing the importance of variables from a revised technology acceptance model for the use of ChatGPT by university students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, Article 100435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100435
- Mbwambo, N. M., & Kaaya, P. B. (2024). ChatGPT in education: Applications, concerns and recommendations. Journal of ICT Systems, 2(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.56279/jicts.v2i1.9020
- McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601087
- Montag, C., & Ali, R. (2025). Can we assess attitudes toward AI with single items? associations with existing attitudes toward AI measures and trust in ChatGPT. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-025-00481-7
- Naznin, K., Al Mahmud, A., Nguyen, M. T., & Chua, C. (2025). ChatGPT integration in higher education for personalized learning, academic writing, and coding tasks: A systematic review. Computers, 14(2), Article 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14020053
- Neumann, M., Rauschenberger, M., & Schön, E.-M. (2023). “we need to talk about ChatGPT”: The future of AI and higher education. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering Education for the Next Generation (pp. 29-32). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEENG59157.2023.00010
- Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self-regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 1328-1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13454
- Olson, J. M., Vernon, P. A., Harris, J. A., & Jang, K. L. (2001). The heritability of attitudes: A study of twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 845-860. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.845
- Or, C. (2023). The role of attitude in the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A meta-analytic structural equation modelling study. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 7(4), 552-570. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.504
- Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(1), 12-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90003-1
- Oyelere, S. S., & Aruleba, K. (2025). A comparative study of student perceptions on generative AI in programming education across sub-Saharan Africa. Computers and Education Open, 8, Article 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100245
- Paudel, S. R., & Acharya, N. (2024). Factors affecting behavioral intention to use ChatGPT: Mediating role of attitude. Journal of Service, Innovation and Sustainable Development, 5(2), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.33168/SISD.2024.0209
- Polverini, G., Melin, J., Önerud, E., & Gregorcic, B. (2025). Performance of ChatGPT on tasks involving physics visual representations: The case of the brief electricity and magnetism assessment. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21, Article 010154. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010154
- Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., A. Iahad, N., Abdulla, A. A., Akopyan, A., Aldana Segura, M. W., AlHumaid, J., et al. (2025). Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions. PLoS ONE, 20(2), Article e0315011.
- Rosenberg, M. J., Hovland, C. I., McGuire, W. J., Abelson, R. P., & Brehm, J. W. (1960). Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components. Yale University Press.
- Rupnik, D., & Avsec, S. (2025). Toward a coherent AI literacy pathway in technology education: Bibliometric synthesis and cross-sectional assessment. Education Sciences, 15(11), Article 1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111455
- Sallam, M., Salim, N. A., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Assessing health students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation study. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), Article e48254. https://doi.org/10.2196/48254
- Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2023). The general attitudes towards artificial intelligence scale (GAAIS): Confirmatory validation and associations with personality, corporate distrust, and general trust. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(13), 2724-2741. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085400
- Schermelleh, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784
- Schön, E.-M., Neumann, M., Hofmann-Stölting, C., Baeza-Yates, R., & Rauschenberger, M. (2023). How are AI assistants changing higher education? Frontiers in Computer Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1208550
- Sindermann, C., Sha, P., Zhou, M., Wernicke, J., Schmitt, H. S., Li, M., Sariyska, R., Stavrou, M., Becker, B., & Montag, C. (2021). Assessing the attitude towards artificial intelligence: Introduction of a short measure in German, Chinese, and English language. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(1), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00689-0
- Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., & Malmström, H. (2024). Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259
- Stößel, K., Kämpfe, N., & Riemann, R. (2006). The Jena twin registry and the Jena twin study of social attitudes (JeTSSA). Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9(6), 783-786. https://doi.org/10.1375/183242706779462615
- Stoyanova, D., Stoyanova-Petrova, S., & Mileva, N. (2025). Exploring students’ and teachers’ perceptions about using ChatGPT in programming education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 15(2), 15-41. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v15i2.50607
- Sublime, J., & Renna, I. (2024). Is ChatGPT massively used by students nowadays? A survey on the use of large language models such as ChatGPT in educational settings. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.17486
- Svenningsson, J., Höst, G., Hultén, M., & Hallström, J. (2022). Students’ attitudes toward technology: Exploring the relationship among affective, cognitive and behavioral components of the attitude construct. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 1531-1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09657-7
- Tafhi, O., Khattabi, K. E., Lamrabet, M., Ouzennou, F., & Chikhaoui, A. (2025). Mapping physical Moroccan sciences student’s perceptions of AI: A case study on generative AI (ChatGPT). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(1), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.1.2230
- Thong, C. L., Butson, R., & Lim, W. (2023). Understanding the impact of ChatGPT in education: Exploratory study on students’ attitudes, perception and ethics. In Proceedings of the ASCILITE Publications (pp. 234-243). https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.461
- Tong, D., Tao, Y., Zhang, K., Dong, X., Hu, Y., Pan, S., & Liu, Q. (2024). Investigating ChatGPT-4’s performance in solving physics problems and its potential implications for education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(2), 1379-1389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09913-6
- Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027127
- Waite, J., & Garside, B. (2023). From ethics to engines, framing AI literacy (including algorithm literacy and data literacy) through the SEAME framework. UNESCO. https://computingeducationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/UNESCO_submission-20.pdf
- Walker, S. H., Walker, D., & Widaman, K. (2020). The ABCs of math attitudes: Reliability and validity of the three factor model. Journal of Studies in Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v10i1.15792
- Wang, C., Wang, H., Li, Y., Dai, J., Gu, X., & Yu, T. (2025). Factors influencing university students’ behavioral intention to use generative artificial intelligence: Integrating the theory of planned behavior and AI literacy. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(11), 6649-6671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033
- Wang, K. D., Burkholder, E., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., & Haber, N. (2024). Examining the potential and pitfalls of ChatGPT in science and engineering problem-solving. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1330486
- Yilmaz, H., Maxutov, S., Baitekov, A., & Balta, N. (2023). Student attitudes towards ChatGPT: A technology acceptance model survey. International Educational Review, 1(1), 57-83. https://doi.org/10.58693/ier.114
- Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023). Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining student views on the use of ChatGPT for programming learning. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), Article 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100005
- Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. (1998). Structural equation modeling with robust covariances. Sociological Methodology, 28(1), 363-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00052
- Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Xiao, Y., Chang, H., & Liu, B. (2024). Factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT in high education: An integrated model with PLS-SEM and FSQCA approach. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241289835
How to cite this article
APA
Veith, J., Bauer, A., Becker, E., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2026). Exploring physics students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT using the ABC model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(2), em2770. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17822
Vancouver
Veith J, Bauer A, Becker E, Bitzenbauer P. Exploring physics students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT using the ABC model. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(2):em2770. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17822
AMA
Veith J, Bauer A, Becker E, Bitzenbauer P. Exploring physics students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT using the ABC model. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(2), em2770. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17822
Chicago
Veith, Joaquin, Antonia Bauer, Eleonore Becker, and Philipp Bitzenbauer. "Exploring physics students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT using the ABC model". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 2 (2026): em2770. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17822
Harvard
Veith, J., Bauer, A., Becker, E., and Bitzenbauer, P. (2026). Exploring physics students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT using the ABC model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(2), em2770. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17822
MLA
Veith, Joaquin et al. "Exploring physics students’ attitudes toward ChatGPT using the ABC model". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 2, 2026, em2770. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17822
Full Text (PDF)