Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Absari, N., Priyanto, P., & Muslikhin, M. (2020). The effectiveness of technology, pedagogy and content knowledge (TPACK) in learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan [Journal of Technology and Vocational Education], 26, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.21831/JPTK.V26I1.24012
• Akturk, A. O., & Saka Ozturk, H. (2019). Teachers’ TPACK levels and students’ self-efficacy as predictors of students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 283-294.
• Al Said, R. S., Du, X., ALKhatib, H. A. H., Romanowski, M. H., & Barham, A. I. I. (2019). Math teachers’ beliefs, practices, and belief change in implementing problem based learning in Qatari primary governmental school. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5), em1710. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105849
• Aldossry, B., & Lally, V. (2019). Investigating the integration of iPad among mathematics teachers in a secondary school in Saudi Arabia based on TPACK model. In Proceedings of the 11^th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 8133-8138). https://doi.org/10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.1995
• Anderhag, P., Wickman, P., Bergqvist, K., Jakobson, B., Hamza, K., & Säljö, R. (2016). Why do secondary school students lose their interest in science? or does it never emerge? A possible and overlooked explanation. Science Education, 100, 791-813. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.21231
• Anud, E. (2022). Teaching performance of science teachers in the new normal and their technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) self-efficacy. International Journal of Applied Science and Research. https://doi.org/10.56293/ijasr.2022.5410
• Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
• Astuti, P., Subali, B., Hapsari, N., Pradana, S., & Antony, M. (2019). TPACK mastery of biology teachers: A study based on teacher gender. Journal of Physics, 1397, 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012050
• Ayite, D., Aheto, S., & Nyagorme, P. (2022). Gender dimensions of emerging technologies for learning in a University. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2071389. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2071389
• Bakar, N., Maat, S., & Rosli, R. (2020). Mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy of technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11, 259-276. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10818.259-276
• Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
• Banal, C., & Cruz, R. (2022). Teachers’ resilience in facing workload adversities in times of pandemic: The case of the private school teachers in a developing country. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.20473/ijss.v14i1.35946
• Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press.
• Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C., & Tan, L. (2011). Modelling primary school pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
• Christensen, R. (2022). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782359
• Driel, J., Verloop, N., & Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
• Du, X. Y, Chaaban, Y., & ALMabrd, Y. M. (2019). Exploring the concepts of fidelity and adaptation in the implementation of project based learning in the elementary classroom: Case studies from Qatar. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.9.1
• Engeness, I. (2020). Developing teachers’ digital identity: Towards the pedagogic design principles of digital environments to enhance students’ learning in the 21^st century. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 96-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1849129
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
• Fathy, H. F., & Malkawi, A. R. (2022). Primary science teachers’ perceptions towards STEM education in public schools in Qatar. Journal of Education and Practice, 13(24), 34-52.
• Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 499-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2009.05.004
• Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 530-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00472.x
• Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570
• Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K. (1992). The influence of individual differences on skill in end user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1992.11517949
• Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
• Hong, J., & Francis, D. (2020). Unpacking complex phenomena through qualitative inquiry: The case of teacher identity research. Educational Psychologist, 55, 208-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1783265
• Hossain, S. F. A., Ying, Y., & Saha, S. K. (2020). Systematic mobile device usage behavior and successful implementation of TPACK based on university students need. In: K. Arai, & S. Kapoor (Eds.), Advances in intelligent systems and computing (pp. 729-746). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17795-9_55
• Igbaria, M., & Chakrabarti, A. (1990). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use. Behavior and Information Technology, 9(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299008924239
• Islahi, F., & Nasrin (2019). Exploring teacher attitude towards information technology with a gender perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.30935/CET.512527
• Jordan, K. (2013). The influence of gender on beginning teachers’ perceptions of their technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Australian Educational Computing, 28(2), 32-50.
• Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., Abdelkader, N., & Umer, S. (2022). A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: Trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101-111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
• Kubieck, J. (2005). Inquiry-based learning, the nature of science, and computer technology: New possibilities in science education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.21432/T29C77
• Kyriacou, C., & Kunc, R. (2007). Beginning teachers’ expectations of teaching: Do they really matter? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(5), 509-524.
• Lavidas, K., Katsidima, M., Theodoratou, S., Komis, V., & Nikolopoulou, K. (2021). Preschool teachers’ perceptions about TPACK in Greek educational context. Journal of Computers in Education, 8, 395-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00184-x
• Liu, Q., Zhang, S., & Wang, Q. (2015). Surveying Chinese in-service k12 teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53, 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115585929
• Mailizar, M., Hidayat, M., & Artika, W. (2021). The effect of demographic variables on mathematics teachers’ TPACK: Indonesian context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882, 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012041
• Mansour, N. & EL-Deghaidy, H. (2021). STEM in science education and S in STEM: From pedagogy to learning. Brill-Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446076
• Mansour, N. (2013). Modelling the sociocultural contexts of science education: The teachers’ perspective. Research in Science Education, 43, 347-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9269-7
• Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ views and stereotypes of religion, scientists and scientific research: A call for scientist-science teacher partnerships to promote inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1767-1794. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1049575
• Mansour, N. (2020). The dissonance between scientific evidence, diversity and dialogic pedagogy in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 42(2), 190-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1706114
• Mansour, N. (2024). Students’ and facilitators’ experiences with synchronous and asynchronous online dialogic discussions and e-facilitation in understanding the Nature of Science. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12473-w
• Mansour, N., EL-Deghaidy, H., Alshamrani, S., & Aldahmash, A. (2014). Rethinking the theory and practice of continuing professional development: Science teachers’ perspectives. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 949-973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9409-y
• Mdolo, M., & Mundalamo, F. (2015). Teacher knowledge shaping the teaching of genetics: A case study of two underqualified teachers in Malawi. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.985468
• Ministry of Education and Higher Education, Qatar. (2017). Education and training sector strategy 2018-2022. https://www.edu.gov.qa/en/Pages/AboutMinistry/AboutMinistry.aspx?ItemID=73
• Mirzajani, H., Mahmud, R., Ayub, A., & Wong, S. (2016). Teachers’ acceptance of ICT and its integration in the classroom. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2014-0025
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
• Mullis, S., Martin, O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). The TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
• Mullis, S., Martin, O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
• Mullis, S., Martin, O., Foy, P., Kelly, L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
• Murphy, C., Abu-Tineh, A., Calder, N., & Mansour, N. (2018). Implementing dialogic inquiry in Qatari mathematics and science classrooms: Challenges and provocations. Teachers and Curriculum, 18(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v18i1.318
• Murphy, C., Abu-Tineh, A., Calder, N., & Mansour, N. (2021). Teachers and students’ views prior to introducing inquiry-based learning in Qatari science and mathematics classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103367
• Naji, K. K., Al-Thani, H. H., Al-Ali, A. K. A., Ebead, U. A. A., & Du, X. (2020). Characteristics, benefits, challenges, and socio-cultural factors of implementing PBL in Qatar. In Proceedings of the 8^th International Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning (pp. 148-156). Aalborg University.
• Naji, K. K., Ebead, E., Al-Ali, A., & Du, X. (2020). Comparing models of problem and project-based learning (PBL) courses and student engagement in civil engineering in Qatar. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(8), em1867. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8291
• Nasser, R. (2014). Using mobile device to increase student academic outcomes in Qatar. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.4236/JSS.2014.22010
• Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15 year olds know and what they can do with what they know. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfndings/pisa-​2012-​results-​overview.pdf
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2016). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-​2015-​results-​in-​focus.pdf
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2018). Qatar: Student performance (PISA 2018). https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=QAT&treshold=10&topic=PI
• Player-Koro, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ use of ICT in education. Education Inquiry, 3(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v3i1.22015
• Qatar National Research Fund. (n.d.). Education. https://www.qnrf.org/en-us/Search-Results?Search=education
• Qazi, A., Hasan, N., Abayomi-Alli, O., Hardaker, G., Scherer, R., Sarker, Y., Paul, S., & Maitama, J. Z. (2022). Gender differences in information and communication technology use & skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 4225-4258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10775-x
• Qureshi, S., Vishnumolakala, V. R., Southam, D. C., & Treagust, D. F. (2017). Inquiry-based chemistry education in a high-context culture: A Qatari case study. International Journal of Science and Math Education, 15, 1017-1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9735-9
• Rogers, M., Cross, D., Gresalfi, M., Trauth-Nare, A., & Buck, G. (2011). First year implementation of a project-based learning approach: The need for addressing teachers’ orientations in the era of reform. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 893-917. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-010-9248-X
• Rohaan, E., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. (2012). Analyzing teacher knowledge for technology education in primary schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-010-9147-Z
• Said, Z. (2016). Science education reform in Qatar: Progress and challenges. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(8), 2253-2265. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1301a
• Said, Z., Mansour, N. & Abu-Tineh, A., (2023) Integrating technology pedagogy and content knowledge in Qatar’s preparatory and secondary schools: The perceptions and practices of STEM teachers. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2271. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13188
• Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009) Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
• Sellami, A., Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Abdelkader, N., & Al Thani, M. (2021). A critical review of research on STEM education in Qatar, International Journal of Humanities Education, 20(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0063/CGP/v20i01/19-37
• Sojanah, J., Suwatno, S., Kodri, K., & Machmud, A. (2021). Factors affecting teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (a survey on economics teacher knowledge). Journal Ilmiah Pendidikan [Educational Scientific Journal], 40(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21831/CP.V40I1.31035
• Stohlmann, M., Moore, T., & Roehrig, G. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
• Swallow, M., & Olofson, M. (2017). Contextual understandings in the TPACK framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4), 228-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1347537
• Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31, 235-251. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.1672
• Wilson, K. (2020). Exploring the challenges and enablers of implementing a stem project-based learning program in a diverse junior secondary context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 881-897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8
• Zhou, G., & Xu, j. (2007). Adoption of educational technology: How does gender matter? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 140-153.

APA

Mansour, N., Said, Z., & Abu-Tineh, A. (2024). Factors impacting science and mathematics teachers’ competencies and self-efficacy in TPACK for PBL and STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(5), em2442. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14467

Vancouver

Mansour N, Said Z, Abu-Tineh A. Factors impacting science and mathematics teachers’ competencies and self-efficacy in TPACK for PBL and STEM. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(5):em2442. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14467

AMA

Mansour N, Said Z, Abu-Tineh A. Factors impacting science and mathematics teachers’ competencies and self-efficacy in TPACK for PBL and STEM. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(5), em2442. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14467

Chicago

Mansour, Nasser, Ziad Said, and Abdullah Abu-Tineh. "Factors impacting science and mathematics teachers’ competencies and self-efficacy in TPACK for PBL and STEM". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 5 (2024): em2442. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14467

Harvard

Mansour, N., Said, Z., and Abu-Tineh, A. (2024). Factors impacting science and mathematics teachers’ competencies and self-efficacy in TPACK for PBL and STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(5), em2442. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14467

MLA

Mansour, Nasser et al. "Factors impacting science and mathematics teachers’ competencies and self-efficacy in TPACK for PBL and STEM". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 5, 2024, em2442. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14467