How Children Get to Know and Identify Species

Barbara Jaun-Holderegger; Hans-Joachim Lehnert; Petra Lindemann-Matthies

doi:10.29333/ejmste/11443

Full Text (PDF)

Barbara Jaun-Holderegger ¹ ^* , Hans-Joachim Lehnert ², Petra Lindemann-Matthies ²

More Detail

¹ Bern University of Teacher Education, SWITZERLAND² Karlsruhe University of Education, GERMANY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study investigated with the help of in-depth interviews and a think-aloud-approach how 10-to12-year-old children (n = 46) in the Canton of Berne, Switzerland, get to know species, how they identify plants and animals, and for how important they consider species knowledge to be. Own observations and sensual experiences coupled with positive emotions were most prominent when children encountered plants and animals for the first time. Family members helped most in getting to know species, and were more needed in case of plants. When describing plants, children focused less on flower or flower color than on other characteristic traits. In case of animals, special attention was paid on the body, i.e., its size, form and color. Mean knowledge of animals and mean number of traits mentioned per class was positively related. Children considered species knowledge important for utilitarian reasons and because they thought it part of a general education.

Keywords

species knowedge
environmental education
primary school
perception of traits

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2022, Volume 18, Issue 1, Article No: em2061

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11443

Publication date: 24 Dec 2021

Article Views: 1460

Article Downloads: 882

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Albert, C., Luque, G. M., & Courchamp, F. (2018). The twenty most charismatic species. PLOS One, 13(7), e0199149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199149
Balas, B., & Momsen, J. L. (2014). Attention “blinks” differently for plants and animals. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13, 437-443. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.1405-0080
Barker, S., Slingsby, D., & Tilling, S. (2002). Teaching biology outside the classroom. Is it heading for extinction? Field Studies Council Occasional Publication 72. Field Studies Council.
Barrett, H. C., & Broesch, J. (2012). Prepared social learning about dangerous animals in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 499-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.01.003
Batt, S. (2009). Human attitudes towards animals in relation to species similarity to humans: a multivariate approach. Bioscience Horizons, 2, 180-190. https://doi.org/10.1093/biohorizons/hzp021
Bermudez, G. M., Battistón, L. V., Capocasa, M. C. G., & De Longhi, A. L. (2017). Sociocultural variables that impact high school students’ perceptions of native fauna: a study on the species component of the biodiversity concept. Research in Science Education, 47, 203-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9496-4
Bermudez, G. M., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2020). “What matters is species richness” - high school students’ understanding of the components of biodiversity. Research in Science Education, 50, 2159-2187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9767-y
Bögeholz, S. (2006). Nature experience and its importance for environmental knowledge, values and action: recent German empirical contributions. Environmental Education Research, 12, 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620500526529
Bollnow, O. F. (1966). Sprache und Erziehung [Language and education] (3rd ed.). Kohlhammer.
Borgi, M., & Cirulli, F. (2015). Attitudes toward animals among kindergarten children: Species preferences. Anthrozoös, 28, 45-59. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279315X14129350721939
Braund, M. (1998). Trends in children’s concepts of vertebrate and invertebrate. Journal of Biological Education, 32, 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1998.9655606
Breuer, G. B., Schlegel, J., Kauf, P., & Rupf, R. (2015). The Importance of Being Colorful and Able to Fly: interpretation and implications of children’s statements on selected insects and other invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 2664-2687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1099171
Bringolf-Isler, B., Grize, L., Ruch, N., Sennhauser, F. H., & Braun-Fahrländer, C. (2010). Built environment, parents’ perception, and children’s vigorous outdoor play. Preventive Medicine, 50, 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.03.008
Campos, C. M., Greco, S., Ciarlante, J. J., Balangione, M., Bender, J. B., Nates, J., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2012). Students’ familiarity and initial contact with species in the Monte desert (Mendoza, Argentina). Journal of Arid Environments, 82, 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.02.013
Carmi, N., Arnon, S., & Orion, N. (2015). Transforming environmental knowledge into behavior: the mediating role of environmental emotions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46, 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1028517
Chawla, L. (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30, 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595441
Clements, R. (2004). An investigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 5, 68-80. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2004.5.1.10
Condon, M. (1995). Biodiversity, systematics, and Tom Sawyer science. Conservation Biology, 9(4), 711-714. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040711.x
Crisci, J. V. (1993). Order & diversity in the living world: Teaching taxonomy & systematics in schools. National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT), 11250 Roger Bacon Drive, # 19, Reston, VA 22090.
Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific observation: how children learn to observe the biologist’s world. Review of Educational Research, 79, 39-68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325899
Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2011). Plants have a chance: outdoor educational programmes alter student’s knowledge and attitudes towards plants. Environmental Education Research, 17, 537-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.545874
Galli, L. G., & Meinardi, E. (2015). Obstáculos para el aprendizaje del modelo de evolución por selección natural, en estudiantes de escuela secundaria de Argentina [Obstacles to learning the evolution by natural selection model in high school students from Argentina]. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 21, 101-122. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516731320150010007
Gatt, S., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Borg, K., & Lautier, K. (2007). Young Maltese children’s ideas about plants. Journal of Biological Education, 41, 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656080
Gill, T. (2014). The benefits of children’s engagement with nature: A systematic literature review. Children Youth and Environments, 24, 10-34. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.24.2.0010
Hooykaas, M. J., Schilthuizen, M., Aten, C., Hemelaar, E. M., Albers, C. J., & Smeets, I. (2019). Identification skills in biodiversity professionals and laypeople: A gap in species literacy. Biological Conservation, 238, e108202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108202
Huxham, M., Welsh, A., Berry, A., & Templeton, S. (2006). Factors influencing primary school children’s knowledge of wildlife. Journal of Biological Education, 41, 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656050
Jäkel, L. (1992). Lernvoraussetzungen von Schülern in bezug auf Sippenkenntnis [Learning requirements of pupils with regard to taxonomic knowledge]. Unterricht Biologie, 16(172), 40-41.
Kellert, S. R., & Westervelt, M. O. (1983). Historical trends in American animal use and perception. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 4(2), 133-146.
Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S. R. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 43-69). Island Press.
Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Memory and emotion. In L. Feldman Barrett, M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 564-578). Guilford Press.
Kumar, N., Belhumeur, P. N., Biswas, A., Jacobs, D. W., Kress, W. J., Lopez, I. C., & Soares, J. V. B. (2012). Leafsnap: A computer vision system for automatic plant species identification. In A. Fitzgibbon, S. Lazebnik, P. Perona, Y. Sato, & C. Schmid (Eds.), Computer vision -ECCV 2012 (pp. 502–516). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_36
Leather, S. R., & Quicke, D. J. L. (2009). Where would Darwin have been without taxonomy? Journal of Biological Education, 43, 51-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656151
Leather, S. R., & Quicke, D. J. L. (2010). Do shifting baselines in natural history knowledge threaten the environment? The Environmentalist, 30, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-009-9246-0
Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2005). “Loveable” mammals and “lifeless” plants: How children’s interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 635-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038116
Lindemann-Matthies, P., Remmele, M., & Yli-Panula, E. (2017). Professional competence of student teachers to implement species identification in schools – a case study from Germany. CEPS Journal, 7(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.12
Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Köhler, K. (2019). Naturalized versus traditional school grounds: Which elements do students prefer and why? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 46, 126475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126475
Louv, R. (2006). Last child in the woods. Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin books of Chapel Hill.
Mullan, K. (2019). A child’s day: Trends in time use in the UK from 1975 to 2015. The British Journal of Sociology, 70, 997-1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12369
New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 16598-16603. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703913104
Palmberg, I., Berg, I., Jeronen, E., Kärkkäinen, S., Norrgård-Sillanpää, P., Persson, C., Vilkonis, R., & Yli-Panula, E. (2015). Nordic–Baltic student teachers’ identification of and interest in plant and animal species: The importance of species identification and biodiversity for sustainable development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 549-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9438-z
Palmberg, I., Hermans, M., Jeronen, E., Kärkkäinen, S., Persson, C., & Yli-Panula, E. (2018). Nordic student teachers’ views on the importance of species and species identification. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29, 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1468167
Papworth, S. K., Rist, J., Coad, L., & Milner‐Gulland, E. J. (2009). Evidence for shifting baseline syndrome in conservation. Conservation Letters, 2, 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00049.x
Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). What plants and animals do early childhood and primary students’ name? Where do they see them? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 630-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9290-7
Patrick, P., Byrne, J., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Asunta, T., Carvalho, G., Havu-Nuutinen, S., …, & Tracana, R. B. (2013). Students (ages 6, 10, 15 years) in six countries knowledge of animals. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 9, 18-32. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.624
Pfeiffer, V. D., Scheiter, K., Kühl, T., & Gemballa, S. (2011). Learning how to identify species in a situated learning scenario: using dynamic-static visualizations to prepare students for their visit to the aquarium. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7, 135-147. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.724
Pilgrim, S. E., Cullen, L. C., Smith, D. J., & Pretty, J. (2008). Ecological knowledge is lost in wealthier communities and countries. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 1004-1009. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070837v
Prezza, M., Alparone, F., Cristallo, C. & Secchiano, L. (2005). Parental perception of social risk and of positive potentiality of outdoor autonomy for children: The development of two instruments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 437-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.12.002
Prokop, P., & Randler, C. (2018). Biological predispositions and individual differences in human attitudes toward animals. In R. R. N. Alves, & U. P. de Albuquerque (Eds.), Ethnozoology: animals in our lives (pp. 447-466). Academic Press.
Pyle, R. M. (1993). The thunder tree: Lessons from an urban wildland. Houghton Mifflin.
Pyle, R. M. (2002). Eden in a vacant lot: Special places, species, and kids in the neighborhood of life. In P. H. Kahn, Jr., & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 305-327). MIT Press.
Randler, C., & Bogner, F. (2002). Comparing methods of instruction using bird species identification skills as indicators. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2002.9655830
Randler, C. (2008). Teaching species identification – a prerequisite for learning biodiversity and understanding ecology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75344
Remmele, M., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2018). Like father, like son? On the relationship between parents’ and children’s familiarity with species and sources of knowledge about plants and animals. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 14(10), em1581. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92287
Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M²: media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Schauer, T., & Caspari, C. (2010). Der BLV Pflanzenführer für unterwegs [The BLV plant guide on the road] (4th ed.). BLV.
Scherf, G. (1988). Kenntnis häufiger Pflanzen des Straßenrandes und Vorstellungen über Pflanzen bei 9-12jährigen Schülern und bei jungen Erwachsenen (Lehramtstudenten und Schülern einer Fachakademie für Sozialpädagogik) [Knowledge of common roadside plants and ideas about plants of 9-12 year old students and young adults (students of a teachers’ training college and students of an academy of social work)]. Sachunterricht und Mathematik in der Primarstufe, 16(9), 196-204.
Schussler, E. E., & Olzak, L. A. (2008). It’s not easy being green: Student recall of plant and animal images. Journal of Biological Education, 42, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2008.9656123
Shepardson, D. P. (2002). Bugs, butterflies, and spiders: children’s understandings about insects. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 627-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074765
Slingsby, D. (2009). Charles Darwin, biological education and diversity: past present and future. Journal of Biological Education, 43, 99-100.
Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
Soga, M., Gaston, K. J., Koyanagi, T. F., Kurisu, K., & Hanaki, K. (2016). Urban residents’ perceptions of neighbourhood nature: Does the extinction of experience matter? Biological Conservation, 203, 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.020
Soga, M., Yamanoi, T., Tsuchiya, K., Koyanagi, T. F., & Kanai, T. (2018). What are the drivers of and barriers to children’s direct experiences of nature? Landscape and Urban Planning, 180, 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.015
Spohn, M., Golte-Bechtle, M., & Spohn, R. (2015). Was blüht denn da? [What is flowering?]. Kosmos.
Tandon, P. S., Zhou, C., & Christakis, D. A. (2012). Frequency of parent-supervised outdoor play of US preschool-aged children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166, 707-712. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1835
Tomkins, S. P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2015). Naming the living world: From the infant’s perception of animacy to a child’s species concept. In C. J. Boulter, & D. Sanders (Eds.), New directions in mathematics and science education. Darwin-inspired learning (pp. 147-163). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-833-6_12
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (1999). Building a model of the environment: How do children see animals? Journal of Biological Education, 33, 142-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655654
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (2000). Building a model of the environment: how do children see plants? Journal of Biological Education, 34, 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655714
Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Talking about plants - comments of primary school groups looking at plant exhibits in a botanical garden. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2001.9655792
Tunnicliffe, S. D., Gatt, S., Agius, C., & Pizzuto, S. A. (2008). Animals in the lives of young Maltese Children. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75343
Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (1999). Preventing plant blindness. The American Biology Teacher, 61, 82-86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4450624
Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (2001). Toward a theory of plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 47, 2-12.
Yorek, N., Şahin, M., & Aydın, H. (2009). Are animals ‘more alive’ than plants? Animistic-anthropocentric construction of life concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5, 369-378. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75287
Zucchi, H. (2007). Zur Bedeutung und zum Erwerb von Artenkenntnissen [On the importance and acquisition of species knowledge]. Unterricht Biologie, 324, 44-45.

How to cite this article

APA

Jaun-Holderegger, B., Lehnert, H.-J., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2022). How Children Get to Know and Identify Species. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11443

Vancouver

Jaun-Holderegger B, Lehnert HJ, Lindemann-Matthies P. How Children Get to Know and Identify Species. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(1):em2061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11443

AMA

Jaun-Holderegger B, Lehnert HJ, Lindemann-Matthies P. How Children Get to Know and Identify Species. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(1), em2061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11443

Chicago

Jaun-Holderegger, Barbara, Hans-Joachim Lehnert, and Petra Lindemann-Matthies. "How Children Get to Know and Identify Species". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 1 (2022): em2061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11443

Harvard

Jaun-Holderegger, B., Lehnert, H.-J., and Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2022). How Children Get to Know and Identify Species. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11443

MLA

Jaun-Holderegger, Barbara et al. "How Children Get to Know and Identify Species". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 1, 2022, em2061. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11443