Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2009). Introducing a fifth pedagogy: Experience-based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802711282
• Bascopé, M., Reiss, K., & Castillo, D. (2021). Place-based STEM education for sustainability: A path toward local socioecological resilience. Sustainability, 13(15), Article 8414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158414
• Bevan, B., Calabrese Barton, A., & Garibay, C. (2020). Broadening perspectives on broadening participation: Professional learning tools for more expansive and equitable science communication. Frontiers in Communication 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00052
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2009). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 548-556). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0
• Brand, B. R. (2020). Integrating science and engineering practices: Outcomes from a collaborative professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00210-x
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Brown, P. L., Concannon, J. P., Marx, D., Donaldson, C., & Black, A. (2016). An examination of middle school students’ STEM self-efficacy, interests and perceptions. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 17(3).
• Buldur, S., Sıcak, B., & Yıldırım, C. (2018). The effects of interdisciplinary nature education on pre-service science teachers’ environmental awareness. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(12), 17-25.
• Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
• Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Smith, R. (2003). Ecological literacy: The “missing paradigm” in environmental education (part one). Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 497-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462032000126131
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
• Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. In Proceedings of the 6^th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research (pp. 1-8). Surfers Paradise.
• Đuranović, M., Klasnić, I., & Vidić, T. (2024). Principal support and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of collective teacher efficacy. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 693-703. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.2.693
• Gao, X., Li, Y., Zhang, M., & Huang, Z. (2025). Exploring methodological rigor in mixed-methods STEM education research: Lessons from classroom-based interventions. International Journal of STEM Education, 12, Article 42.
• Greenwood, D. A. (2009). Place, survivance, and white remembrances: A decolonizing challenge to rural education in mobile modernity. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(10), 1-6.
• Greenwood, D. A. (2013). A critical theory of place-conscious education. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 93-100). Routledge.
• Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004003
• Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (2008). Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity. Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, science, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9673-x
• Hammack, R., Yeter, I. H., Pavlovich, C., Shulruf, B., & Lee, J. (2024). Pre-service elementary teachers’ science and engineering teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy: Exploring the impacts of efficacy source experiences through varying course modalities. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00464-9
• Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2015). Body talk: Students’ identity construction while discussing a socio-scientific issue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10, 385-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9381-7
• Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (2020). Supporting teachers in integrated STEM education through online learning communities. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1-14.
• Kasimatis, K., Gkantara, C., Psycharis, S., & Petropoulou, O. (2019). Promoting STEM content epistemology in technology enhanced collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 11(2), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.51724/ijpce.v11i2.22
• Kelley, T. R., Knowles, J. G., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers’ self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
• Khut, N. (2024). Development and validation of the TSTSIS instrument to measure teachers’ self-efficacy to teach science through integrated STEM approach. European Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/15480
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
• Li, Y. (2023). Nine years of development in establishing the journal as a learning hub. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00459-y
• Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9
• Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
• Lin, K. Y., Ku, C. J., Wei, H. T., Chen, Y. C., & Chang, H. Y. (2025). Processes, challenges, and teacher roles in developing and implementing collaborative STEM curricula: Case studies of two Taiwanese schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 12, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00545-3
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
• Liu, J., Aziku, M., Qiang, F., Chen, X., Zhang, W., & Huang, X. (2024). Leveraging professional learning communities in linking digital professional development and instructional integration: Evidence from 16,072 STEM teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00513-3
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452219103
• Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
• Mercier, A. K., Kennelly, J., & Lines, C. (2025). Shaping change locally: A place-based STEM project’s influence on rural elementary and middle grade students. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1584805
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
• Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K. M., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 35-54.
• Murad, T., Assadi, N., Zoabi, M., Hamza, S., & Ibdah, M. (2022). The contribution of professional learning community of pedagogical instructors, training teachers and teaching students within a clinical model for teacher education to their professional development. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1009-1022. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.1009
• Neher-Asylbekov, S., & Wagner, I. (2023). Effects of out-of-school STEM learning environments on student interest: A critical systematic literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research, 6(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00080-8
• Office of the Education Council. (2020). National education plan (2017-2036). Ministry of Education, Thailand.
• Partnership for 21^st Century Learning. (2009). P21 framework definitions. Battelle for Kids. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources
• Polizzi, S. J., Zhu, Y., Reid, J. W., Lee, H. S., Benken, B. M., & Jaber, L. Z. (2021). Science and mathematics teacher communities of practice: Social influences on discipline-based identity and self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00275-2
• Ramulumo, M., & Shabalala, N. P. (2024). Comparing environmental literacy in STEM and non-STEM preschools: Evaluating the impact on young children’s understanding and attitudes. International Journal of Early Childhood, 56(1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-024-00405-1
• Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academy Press.
• Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.
• Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
• Smith, G. A. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 584-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208300806
• Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities. Orion Society.
• Sogut, M., & Taşar, M. F. (2024). A systematic review of afterschool STEM literature in education. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v3i1.28
• Stevenson, R. B., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. E. J. (Eds.). (2013). International handbook of research on environmental education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813331
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358728
• Tekkumru-Kisa, M., & Stein, M. K. (2017). Designing, facilitating, and scaling-up video-based professional development: Supporting complex forms of teaching in science and mathematics. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0087-y
• Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. UNESCO.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
• UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing.
• Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. N. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915571160
• Vander Ark, T., Liebtag, E., & McClennen, N. (2020). The power of place: Authentic learning through place-based education. ASCD.
• Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
• Wals, A. E. J. (2015). Beyond unreasonable doubt: Education and learning for socio-ecological sustainability in the Anthropocene. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6(2), 56-68.
• Wals, A. E. J., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science education and environmental education. Science Education, 98(4), 583-609. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250515
• Wang, X., Li, Y., Tan, E., & Yoon, S. A. (2021). Fostering students’ STEM career interest: A meta-analysis of the impact of early STEM experiences. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 37.
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
• Yildirim, M. S., Elkoca, A., Gökçay, G., Yılmaz, D. A., & Yıldız, M. (2025). The relationship between environmental literacy, ecological footprint awareness, and environmental behavior in adults. BMC Public Health, 25(1), Article 551. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21340-3
• Zhai, X., Wang, X., & Chen, J. (2024). Science teacher identity research: A scoping literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00481-8
• Zhou, X., Shu, L., Xu, Z., Liu, T., Wang, Y., & Park, H. (2023). The effect of professional development on in-service STEM teachers’ self-efficacy: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00422-x

APA

Chatmaneerungcharoen, S., & Nielsen, W. S. (2026). How place-based professional learning communities shape teachers’ self-efficacy for interdisciplinary STEM instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(7), em2866. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18849

Vancouver

Chatmaneerungcharoen S, Nielsen WS. How place-based professional learning communities shape teachers’ self-efficacy for interdisciplinary STEM instruction. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(7):em2866. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18849

AMA

Chatmaneerungcharoen S, Nielsen WS. How place-based professional learning communities shape teachers’ self-efficacy for interdisciplinary STEM instruction. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(7), em2866. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18849

Chicago

Chatmaneerungcharoen, Siriwan, and Wendy S. Nielsen. "How place-based professional learning communities shape teachers’ self-efficacy for interdisciplinary STEM instruction". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 7 (2026): em2866. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18849

Harvard

Chatmaneerungcharoen, S., and Nielsen, W. S. (2026). How place-based professional learning communities shape teachers’ self-efficacy for interdisciplinary STEM instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(7), em2866. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18849

MLA

Chatmaneerungcharoen, Siriwan et al. "How place-based professional learning communities shape teachers’ self-efficacy for interdisciplinary STEM instruction". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 7, 2026, em2866. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18849