Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ameen, L. T., Yousif, M. R., Alnoori, N. A. J., & Majeed, B. H. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on computational thinking in education at university. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(5), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i5.49995
• Arum, R., Calderon Leon, M., Li, X., & Lopes, J. (2025). ChatGPT early adoption in higher education: Variation in student usage, instructional support, and educational equity. AERA Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584251331956
• Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A. M., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
• Bagdonaitė, J., & Dagienė, V. (2025). Artificial intelligence in primary education: A systematic literature review 2020-2025. Informatics in Education, 24(4), 697-736. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2025.24
• Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2024). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. PNAS, 122(26), Article e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1-25).
• Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
• Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
• Gong, X., Xu, W., & Qiao, A. (2025). Exploring undergraduates’ computational thinking and human-computer interaction patterns in generative progressive prompt-assisted programming learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00552-y
• Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036234942.n1
• Grassini, S. (2025). The cognitive paradox of AI in education: Between enhancement and erosion. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1550621
• Hijón-Neira, R., Pizarro, C., Borrás-Gené, O., & Cavero, S. (2024). AI-generated context for teaching robotics to improve computational thinking in early childhood education. Education Sciences, 14(12), Article 1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121401
• Hsu, H.-P. (2025). From programming to prompting: Developing computational thinking through large language model-based generative artificial intelligence. TechTrends, 69, 485-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01052-6
• Hu, Z., He, H., Zhang, C., & Guan, Y. (2025). Development and influencing factors of artificial intelligence literacy and computational thinking in Chinese university students. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 42708. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26888-z
• Huang, T.-C., & Tseng, H.-P. (2026). Learning, behavior, and pedagogy: A systematic review of generative AI use in programming education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 16(1), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2026.16.1.2487
• Ilic, U., Haseski, H. İ., & Tugtekin, U. (2018). Publication trends over 10 years of computational thinking research. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(2), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.414798
• Kıyıcı, G., & Yamak, H. (2026). Effects of science education on computational thinking: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/18904
• Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
• Liao, J., Zhong, L., Zhe, L., Xu, H., Liu, M., & Xie, T. (2024). Scaffolding computational thinking with ChatGPT. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1628-1642. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3392896
• Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14, Article 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
• Omeh, C. B., Olelewe, C. J., & Ohanu, I. B. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence technology on students’ computational and reflective thinking in a computer programming course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 33, Article e70052. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70052
• Otto, S., Lavi, R., & Bertel, L. B. (2025). Human-GenAI interaction for active learning in STEM education: State-of-the-art and future directions. Computers & Education, 239, Article 105444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105444
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
• Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2004_2
• Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge University Press.
• Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
• Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
• Rohaeti, E., & Huda, N. (2025). Assessing computational thinking skills of science and mathematics upper-secondary school students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/17248
• Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X020003002
• Sánchez Muñoz, J. A., Flores-Eraña, G., Silva-Campos, J. M., Chavira-Quintero, R., & Olais-Govea, J. M. (2025). GenAI as a cognitive mediator: A critical-constructivist inquiry into computational thinking in pre-university education. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1597249
• Sendarrubias-Hipólito, M., Agreda-Montoro, M., Rodríguez-Moreno, J., & Ortiz-Colón, A. M. (2026). The integration of artificial intelligence, robotics, and computational thinking in education: Overview and trends. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(2), Article ep660. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/18600
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
• Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113-5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
• Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5142-5155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
• Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366(1881), 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
• Wu, S.-Y., & Yang, K.-K. (2022). The effectiveness of teacher support for students’ learning of artificial intelligence popular science activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.868623
• Xu, Y., Zhu, J., Wang, M., Qian, F., Yang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). The impact of a digital game-based AI chatbot on students’ academic performance, higher-order thinking, and behavioral patterns in an information technology curriculum. Applied Sciences, 14(15), Article 6418. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156418
• Yunianto, W., Lavicza, Z., Kastner-Hauler, O., & Houghton, T. (2024). Investigating the use of ChatGPT to solve a GeoGebra-based mathematics + computational thinking task in a geometry topic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 1027-1052. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i3.pp1027-1052
• Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6

APA

Mustafa, M., Herman, T., Kusumah, Y. S., Nurjanah, N., & Manda, T. G. (2026). How students engage with LLM-based GenAI to develop computational thinking: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(12), em2961. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19893

Vancouver

Mustafa M, Herman T, Kusumah YS, Nurjanah N, Manda TG. How students engage with LLM-based GenAI to develop computational thinking: A systematic review. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(12):em2961. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19893

AMA

Mustafa M, Herman T, Kusumah YS, Nurjanah N, Manda TG. How students engage with LLM-based GenAI to develop computational thinking: A systematic review. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(12), em2961. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19893

Chicago

Mustafa, Mustafa, Tatang Herman, Yaya S. Kusumah, Nurjanah Nurjanah, and Trysa Gustya Manda. "How students engage with LLM-based GenAI to develop computational thinking: A systematic review". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 12 (2026): em2961. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19893

Harvard

Mustafa, M., Herman, T., Kusumah, Y. S., Nurjanah, N., and Manda, T. G. (2026). How students engage with LLM-based GenAI to develop computational thinking: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(12), em2961. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19893

MLA

Mustafa, Mustafa et al. "How students engage with LLM-based GenAI to develop computational thinking: A systematic review". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 12, 2026, em2961. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19893