Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
• Abramson, A. (2024). How to use ChatGPT as a learning tool. American Psychological Association, 54(3), Article 67.
• Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), Article ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152
• Adnani, E., & Haounani, A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Morocco: Between ethics and regulation. International Journal of Scientific Research, 2(3), 1234-1252. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11621028
• Agathokleous, E., Saitanis, C. J., Fang, C., & Yu, Z. (2023). Use of ChatGPT: What does it mean for biology and environmental science. Science of The Total Environment, 888, Article 164154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164154
• Akhtar, N., Matloob, R., & Nawaz, R. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching of biology at secondary level. International Research Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(3), 427-440.
• AlAbidi, S., AlArabi, K. S., Alsalhi N. R., & al Mansoori, M. (2023). The dawn of ChatGPT: Transformation in science assessment. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 106(106), 321-337.
• Alagui, A., El Hariri, K., Bouab, W., Rafouk, L., & Razouki, A. (2020). Transition from high school to university: Difficulties faced by first-year students at the faculty of sciences. Le Pédagogue, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejedus/11400
• Alarabi, K., Halaweh, M., Tairab, H., Alsalhi, N. R., Annamalai., N., & Aldarmaki, F. (2024). Making a revolution in physics learning in high schools with ChatGPT: A case study in UAE. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), Article em2499. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14983
• Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter P. (2002). Molecular biology of the cell (4th ed.). Garland Science.
• Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2007). Molecular biology of the cell (5th ed.) Garland Science. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203833445
• Alibi, I., & Boilevin, J.-M. (2021). Typology of learning difficulties related to acceleration in higher education. Mediterranean Journal of Education, 1(2), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.26220/mje.3852
• Alnaqbi, H., Bahroun, A., &Vian, A. (2024). Enhancing work productivity through generative artificial intelligence: A comprehensive literature review. Sustainability, 16(3), Article 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031166
• Alneyadi, S., & Wardat, Y. (2023). ChatGPT: Revolutionizing student achievement in the electronic magnetism unit for eleventh-grade students in Emirates schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), Article ep448. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13417
• Astolfi, J. P. (1993). Three paradigms for research in didactics. Revue Française de Pédagogie, (103), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfp.1993.1293
• Ayemele, S., Noubiengang, R., Agbanglanon, S., & Shamsi, M. (2024). ChatGPT under the spotlight: Analysis, awareness, and precautions within the educational system. ENSIM.
• Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Hansell, M. H. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 84-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655648
• Baroud, S., El alaoui, M., Janati-idrissi, R., & Amiri, M. (2022). Difficulties of learning molecular genetics at university: Characterization and analysis of results, American Journal of Innovative Research & Applied Sciences, 15(1), 322-328.
• Bisdas, S., Topriceanu, C. C., Zakrzewska, Z., Irimia, A. V., Shakallis, L., Subhash, J., Casapu, M. M., Leon-Rojas, J., dos Santos, D. P., Andrews, D. M., Zeicu, C., Bouhuwaish, A. M., Lestari, A. N., Abu-Ismail, L., Sadiq, A. S., Khamees, A., Mohammed, K. M. G., Williams, E., Omran, A. I., & Ebrahim, E. H. (2021). Artificial intelligence in medicine: A multinational multicenter survey on the perception of medical and dental students. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.795284
• Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(3), Article ep430. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13176
• Bouhafs, M., & Karam, S. (2020). Identification of linguistic and methodological difficulties among Moroccan science students. International Journal of Legal, Economic and Social Sciences, 1(1).
• Brown, C. R. (1990). Some misconceptions in meiosis shown by students responding to an Advanced level practical examination question in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 24(3), 182-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1990.9655138
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018001032
• Cao, H. T., Huynh, C. B., & Cao, L. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into online education system in Vietnam: Opportunities and challenges. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/hqyut
• Chan, M. M. K., Wong, I. S. F., Yau, S. Y., & Lam, V. S. F. (2023). Critical reflection on the use of ChatGPT in student learning: Benefits or potential risks. Nurse Educator, 48(6), E200-1. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001476
• Chapel, G., & Marzin, P. (2009). Identification and classification of difficulties encountered by 10^th grade students regarding genetic information. In Proceedings of the 6^th ARDIST Conference.
• Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023). AI student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25, 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4
• Choden, T., & Kijkuakul, S. (2020). Blending problem based learning with scientific argumentation to enhance students’ understanding of basic genetics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13129a
• Chouraik, C. (2024). Sustainable AI in Morocco: A systematic review of opportunities, challenges and policy directions. EHEI Journal of Science and Technology, 4(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.34874/PRSM.ehei-jst-vol4iss1.51630
• CNPEN. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence systems: Ethical issues. National Pilot Committee for Digital Ethics
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
• CSEFRS. (2024). For a school of equity, quality and promotion a strategic vision of reform 2015-2030. Journal of Information Sciences, 22(2), 26-40.
• Danielsson A. T., & Linder, C. (2009). Learning in physics by doing laboratory work: Towards a new conceptual framework. Gender and Education, 21(2), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802213081
• Dao, X.-Q., & Le, N. B. (2023). Performance of large language models (LLMs) on the Vietnamese high school biology exam. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 15(6), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2023.06.02
• Dao, X.-Q., Le, N. B., Phan, X. D., & Ngo, B. B. (2023). Evaluation of ChatGPT and Microsoft Bing AI chat performances on physics exams of Vietnamese national high school graduation examination. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.04538
• Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
• Djarmouni, M. (2017). Structural biochemistry course. FSNV. https://fsnv.univsetif.dz/telecharger/EDT2017/Biochimie_structurale.pdf
• Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students’ understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938-959. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20186
• Eden, N. C. A., Adeleye, N. O. O., & Adeniyi, N. I. S. (2024). A review of AI-based pedagogical strategies for equitable access to science education. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 10(2), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.10.2.0043
• Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Baah, P. K. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (Chatbot) on student learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6
• Firat, M. (2023). How ChatGPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education? OSF. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9ge8m
• Freidenreich, H. B., Duncan, R. G., & Shea, N. (2011). Exploring middle school students’ understanding of three conceptual models in genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2323-2349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.536997
• Gérard, L., & Rubio, A. (2020). Sources influencing student engagement in a flipped classroom setup at university. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogy, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/ripes.2212
• Green, C., Eady, M., & Andersen, P. (2018). Preparing quality teachers: Bridging the gap between tertiary experiences and classroom realities. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 6(1), 104-125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.1.10
• Gregorcic, B., & Pendrill, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT and the frustrated Socrates. Physics Education, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/acc299
• Gutierrez, G. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the intensive care unit. Critical Care, 24, Article 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2785-y
• Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. In Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference.
• Harabi, M., & Kilani, C. B. (2019). Analysis of university teaching practice: The case of organic chemistry. Educational Journal of the University of Patras UNESCO Chair, 6(1), 295-307.
• Hogan, D., & O’Flaherty, J. (2021). Addressing education for sustainable development in science teaching: The case of a biology teacher education program. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 12028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112028
• Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
• Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. http://udaeducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05
• Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4099-4112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1952615
• Jmoula, L. (2023). Teaching and learning in the era of ChatGPT: Insights from a literature review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.34874/IMIST.PRSM/jis-v22i2.41122
• Jones, G., Kleckner, N., & Zickler, D. (2024). Meiosis through three centuries. Chromosoma, 133(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-024-00822-0
• Karsenti, T. (2009). Pedagogical integration of ICT in Africa: Action strategies and reflection paths. IDRC. http://crdi.crifpe.ca/karsenti/docs/livre.pdf
• Khan, M. U. H. (2019). UAE’s artificial intelligence strategies and pursuits. Defence Journal, 23(4).
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Examining some assumptions and limitations of research on the effects of emerging technologies for teaching and learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 536-543. https://doi.org/0.1111/bjet.12049
• Knippel, M. C., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976
• Kumar, A. H. S. (2023). Analysis of the ChatGPT tool to assess its potential usefulness for academic writing in the biomedical field. BEMS Reports, 9(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.5530/bems.9.1.5
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
• Lent, R. W. (2008). A social cognitive approach to career development: Theoretical and practical considerations. O. S. P., 37(1), 57-90. https://doi.org/10.4000/osp.1597
• Lin, X. (2024). Exploring the role of ChatGPT as a facilitator for motivating self-directed learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595231184928
• Malinka, K., Perešíni, M., Firc, A., Hujňák, O., & Januš, F. (2023). On the educational impact of ChatGPT: Is artificial intelligence ready to obtain a university degree? Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3587102.3588827
• Mathé, S., Méheut, M., & De Hasson, C. (2008). Inquiry-based learning in middle school: What are the stakes? Didaskalia, (32), 41-76. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/23980
• Nguyen, X. H., Nguyen, A. H., Cao, L., & Truong, H. (2023). Potential of ChatGPT in biology teaching and learning at the Vietnamese high school. Authorea. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.169029376.68639796/v1
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978) Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Nussbaum, R. L., McInnes, R. R., & Willard, H. F. (2015). Thompson & Thompson genetics in medicine. Elsevier.
• Popa, S. L., Ismaiel, A., Brata, V. D., Turtoi, D. C., Barsan, M., Czako, Z., Pop, C., Muresan, L., Stanculete, M. F., Dumitrascu, D. I. (2024). Artificial intelligence and medical specialties: Support or substitution? Medicine and Pharmacy Reports, 97(4), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2696
• Qureshi, B. (2023). Exploring the use of ChatGPT as a tool for learning and assessment in the undergraduate computer science curriculum: Opportunities and challenges. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.11214
• Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023).ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
• Robert, A., & Rogalski, J. (2002). The complex and coherent system of mathematics teachers’ practices: A dual approach. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(4), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150209556538
• Rudolph, J., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: A bullshit detector or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
• Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. North Carolina State University Press.
• Santos, R. P. D. (2023). Enhancing chemistry learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as agents to think with: A comparative case study. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.00709
• Séré, M. G., Journeaux, R., & Winther, J. (1997). Survey on the objectives of practical work in 10th grade, 11th grade S, and 12th grade S classes. Bulletin of the Union of Physicists, 796, 1377-1389.
• Shangying, H., Shuangci, J., & Shengyi, J. (2024). The limitations and ethical considerations of ChatGPT. Data Intelligence, 6(1), 201-239. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00243
• Sijing, L., & Lan, W. (2018). Ethical issues and solutions in artificial intelligence education. In Proceedings of the IEEE 13^th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2018.8468773
• Silar, P. (2020). Genetics: Basic concepts and advanced notions. Hal Open Sciences. https://hal.science/hal-02921475
• Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger. Computers & Education, 151, Article 103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2020.103862
• Stecher, B. (1991). On the road toward educational technology use: Second year research findings from California’s model technology schools. Educational Testing Service. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1991.tb01413.x
• Tiwari, R. (2023). The integration of AI and machine learning in education and its potential to personalize and enhance students' learning experiences. Indian Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem17645
• Tong, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023). Discovering the next decade’s synthetic biology research trends with ChatGPT. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology, 8(2), 220-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2023.02.004
• Truong, H. (2023). ChatGPT in education–A global and Vietnamese research overview. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/r4uhd
• Truong, H., Nguyen, P., Cao, L., Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, P. (2023). Role of ChatGPT in Vietnamese education. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/52smv
• Usak, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in biology education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(5), 806-808. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.806
• Welzel, M., & Haller, K. (1998). Teachers’ objectives for labwork. Institute of Physics Education, University of Bremen.
• Williams, K. (2023). Overcoming dyslexia in higher education: How ChatGPT is changing the game. Dyslexiauk. https://www.dyslexiauk.co.uk/overcoming-dyslexia-in-higher-education-how-chatgpt-ischanging-the-game/
• Wynne, C. F., Stewart, J., & Passmore, C. (2005). High school students’ use of meiosis when solving genetics problems. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 501-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006901750162856
• Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F.G.K. (2023). Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining students’ perspectives on using ChatGPT for programming education. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), Article 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100005
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

APA

Baroud, S., El Alaoui, M., Janati Idrissi, R., Boucetta, N., Ghariz, G., & Seghir, H. (2025). Improving biology learning in high school with ChatGPT: A case study in Morocco. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(7), em2669. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16606

Vancouver

Baroud S, El Alaoui M, Janati Idrissi R, Boucetta N, Ghariz G, Seghir H. Improving biology learning in high school with ChatGPT: A case study in Morocco. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(7):em2669. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16606

AMA

Baroud S, El Alaoui M, Janati Idrissi R, Boucetta N, Ghariz G, Seghir H. Improving biology learning in high school with ChatGPT: A case study in Morocco. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(7), em2669. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16606

Chicago

Baroud, Soumia, Mustafa El Alaoui, Rachid Janati Idrissi, Najat Boucetta, Ghizlane Ghariz, and Hakima Seghir. "Improving biology learning in high school with ChatGPT: A case study in Morocco". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 7 (2025): em2669. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16606

Harvard

Baroud, S., El Alaoui, M., Janati Idrissi, R., Boucetta, N., Ghariz, G., and Seghir, H. (2025). Improving biology learning in high school with ChatGPT: A case study in Morocco. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(7), em2669. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16606

MLA

Baroud, Soumia et al. "Improving biology learning in high school with ChatGPT: A case study in Morocco". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 7, 2025, em2669. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16606