Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning

Safwatun Nida; Vita Ria Mustikasari; Ingo Eilks

doi:10.29333/ejmste/9573

Full Text (PDF)

Safwatun Nida ¹ ² ^* , Vita Ria Mustikasari ¹, Ingo Eilks ²

More Detail

¹ Prodi Pendidikan IPA Universitas Negeri Malang, INDONESIA
² University of Bremen, GERMANY
^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study explores the views of Indonesian junior high school pre-service science teachers (PSTs) towards teaching based on socio-scientific issues (SSIs). Questionnaires were analyzed qualitatively and descriptively. The PSTs (N=62) acknowledged that student competencies ranging from personal to socially relevant skills as well as character formation can potentially be developed through SSI-based instruction. The PSTs mentioned several challenges which may hinder implementation of SSI-based instruction. These include the interdisciplinary and controversial nature of SSIs, a lack of familiarity regarding SSIs, the lack of necessary student skills, insufficient teacher expertise, and curriculum constraints. The PSTs viewed SSIs as able to potentially enhance their personal competencies through SSI-based instruction, mostly with regard to pedagogical skills. The relevance of SSI-based instruction was, however, not seen in as positive a light as the participants’ views on the need of character building. The PSTs’ intentions to later implementing SSI-based instruction ranged from medium to high.

Keywords

science education
curriculum
socio-scientific issues
pre-service science teachers

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9573

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2021 - Volume 17 Issue 1, Article No: em1932

Publication date: 16 Jan 2021

Article Views: 1089

Article Downloads: 768

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Anderson, R. D., & Helms, J. V. (2001). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<3::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-V
Berkowitz , M. W., & Simmons, P. (2003). Integrating science education and character education: The role of peer discussion. In D. L. Zeidler (ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 117-138). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_7
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Virginia: ASCD.
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644
Chen, W., Seow, P., So, H.-J., Toh, Y., & Looi, C.-K. (2010). Connecting learning spaces using mobile technology. Educational Technology, 50(5), 45-50. Retrieved on 15 April 2020 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44429860?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Childs, P. E., Hayes, S. M., & O’Dwyer, A. (2015). Chemistry and everyday life: Relating secondary school chemistry to the current and future lives of students. In I. Eilks, & A. Hofstein (eds.), Relevant Chemistry Education: From Theory to Practice (pp. 33-54). Rotterdam: Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-175-5_3
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S.-W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-Conceptualization of Scientific Literacy in South Korea for the 21st Century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
Davis, E. A., Petish , D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004607
De Jong, O. (2008). Context-based chemical education: How to improve it?. Chemical Education International, 8(1), 1-7. Retrieved on 20 March 2020 from http://www.rsync.iupac.org/publications/cei/vol8/0801xDeJong.pdf
De Jong, O., & Talanquer, V. (2015). Why is it relevant to learn the big ideas in chemistry at school? In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (eds.), Relevant chemistry education: From theory to practice (pp. 11-31). Rotterdam: Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-175-5_2
Eilks, I. (2002). Teaching ‘biodiesel’: A sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching, and students’ first views on it. Chemistry Education: Research Practice in Europe, 3(1), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1039/B1RP90041B
Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development - justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a
Eilks, I., Rauch, F., Ralle, B., & Hofstein, A. (2013). How to allocate the chemistry curriculum between science and society. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (eds), Teaching chemistry: A studybook (pp. 1-36). Rotterdam: Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5_1
Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., & Silfver, E. (2013). Teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific issues: a large scale and in depth study. Research in Science Education, 43, 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9279-5
Evagorou, M. (2011). Discussing a socioscientific issues in a primary school classroom: The case of using technology-supported environment in formal and nonformal settings. In T. D. Sadler (ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 133-159). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_8
Feierabend, T., Jokmin, S., & Eilks, I. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ views on teaching ‘climate change’ - An interview case study from research-oriented learning in teacher education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90011K
Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their Importance for contemporary science education- A pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1459-1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
Kara, Y. (2012). Pre-service biology teachers’ perceptions on the instruction of socio-scientific issues in the curriculum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.633999
Lee, H., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean science teachers’ perceptions of the introduction of socio‐scientific issues into the science curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556691
Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S.-W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre- service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S.-W., Krajcik, J., & Herman, B. C., Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
Mamlok-Naaman, R. M., Eilks, I., Bodner, G., & Hofstein, A. (2018). Professional Development of Chemistry Teachers: Theory and Practice. Croydon: RSC. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788013406-00182
Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009). Promoting scientific literacy using a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: Concept, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 4(3), 231-245. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ884394
Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2010). Research-based development of a lesson plan on shower gels and musk fragrances following a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(2), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1039/C005357K
Marks, R., Bertram, S., & Eilks, I. (2008). Learning chemistry and beyond with a lesson plan on potato crisps, which follows a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry lessons: A case study. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 9(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1039/B812416G
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Retrieved on 5 May 2020 from https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/39517
Morris, H. (2014). Socioscientific issues and multidisciplinarity in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1137-1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.848493
Nida, S., Rahayu, S., & Eilks, I. 2020. A survey of Indonesian science teachers’ experience and perceptions towards socio-scientific issues-based science education. Education Sciences, 10(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10020039
Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2017). Controversial issues in the science classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(4), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717745544
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 87 Tahun 2017. (2017). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter [Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 87 of 2017 concerning Strengthening Character Education]. Retrieved on 1 June 2020 from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/73167/perpres-no-87-tahun-2017
Pitiporntapin, S., Yutakom, N., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Thai pre-service science teachers’ struggles in using Socio-scientific Issues (SSIs) during practicum. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), . Retrieved on 11 December 2019 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318091261_Thai_pre-service_science_teachers’_struggles_in_using_Socio-scientific_Issues_SSIs_during_practicum
Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., Merle- Johnson, D., Witzig, S. B., Izci, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). A framework for socio-scientific issues based education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26-32. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1062183
Sadler, T. D. (2011a). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In T. D. Sadler (ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 1-9). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4
Sadler, T. D. (2011b). Socio-scientific issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI. In T.D Sadler (Ed), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_20
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE (the Relevance of Science Education). Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2). Retrieved on 11 April 2020 from https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v6_issue2_files/foreword.pdf
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions on scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech & D. R. Baker (eds.), Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education (pp. 65-88). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4
Sperling, E., & Bencze, J. L. (2010). ‘More than particle theory’: Citizenship through school science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2010.504487
Stolz, M., Witteck, T., Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). Reflecting socio-scientific issues for science education coming from the case of curriculum development on doping in chemistry education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.945a
Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080 /03057267.2013.802463
Subiantoro, A. W. (2017). Promoting socio-scientific issues-based learning in biology: Indonesian students’ and teacher’s perceptions and students’ informal reasoning (Doctoral thesis). Curtin University, Bentley, Australia. Retrieved on 10 February 2020 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1731/6e1c58cb58ea7929ebf0a37a257166ba01bd.pdf
Turner, S., Ireson, G., & Twidle, J. (2010). Enthusiasm, relevance and creativity: could these teaching qualities stop us alienating pupils from science? School Science Review, 91(337), 51-57. Retrieved on 15 March 2020 from https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/8217
Zeidler, D. L. (2015). Socioscientific issues. In R. Gunstone (ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 998-1003). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_314
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684

How to cite this article

APA

Nida, S., Mustikasari, V. R., & Eilks, I. (2021). Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1932. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9573

Vancouver

Nida S, Mustikasari VR, Eilks I. Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(1):em1932. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9573

AMA

Nida S, Mustikasari VR, Eilks I. Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(1), em1932. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9573

Chicago

Nida, Safwatun, Vita Ria Mustikasari, and Ingo Eilks. "Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 1 (2021): em1932. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9573

Harvard

Nida, S., Mustikasari, V. R., and Eilks, I. (2021). Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1932. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9573

MLA

Nida, Safwatun et al. "Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021, em1932. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9573